lines, I would suggest collecting from this group the
common workflows (if needed), document them on the wiki and advertise
here for review. Then we could use that as a punch list to guide that
work at the hackathon.
If someone wants to start the list of workflows, you can use this
. There were some difficulties along the way and
the team dealt with them in their usual professional way. Kudos to
all, and well done!
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com
e how better or worse it will be in prod.
Although also fair to point out there've been numerous performance
improvements thus far, and no reason to think there won't be more.
Pagure is eminently hackable so we are still encouraging contribution
upstream (of which there has been a lot alr
roject.org/wiki/Changes/InvokingTests
[3] https://pagure.io/pagure/issues
- --
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
to be able to use plain git, right?
> Anything that requires a non-command-line interface for ordinary
> procedures would be a step backwards IMHO.
Plain git still usable the same ways, yes. The things Pagure is doing
are additive (fork/PR, CI hooks, etc.).
--
Paul W. Frields
; tooling to check and enforce this on new package requests, but I
> think it makes sense to stop this requirement to commit on dist-git
> repos.
>
> What do you think?
The way I see it, this doesn't make maintaines give up control but
avoids over-enforcement of controls that may
> On 02/06/2017 04:32 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> Note, I'll likely be cutting a python-bugzilla release this week which fixes
> some issues communicating with bugzilla 5.
That's great Cole. Thanks for keeping up with
eriod (subject to extension)
so the community can check scripts and other tooling for compatibility
and file bugs for any issues discovered. Some work has already gone
into python-bugzilla compatibility to make the transition easier.
Please stay tuned for more information soon.
--
Paul W. Fr
g,
since I happen to have hardware. My hope is other Workstation WG
members will join me. Else we *do* look at removing criteria, not
just throw them over the wall and expect QA to deal with it.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA
> We should handle https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1612 too.
Given the timing/schedule issue, would it be improper to ask about
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1615 in this meeting? (I know
the meeting's underway already and apologize for not seeing this
threa
feature.
>
> Right now, apparently, their install instructions tell you to disable
> SELinux.
Permissive mode is what they require:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/zyga/snapcore/
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC
t would make more sense
since the designers tend to congregate there. It seems to me it
shouldn't be too difficult to find a suitable solution.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
iscussions that ought to involve marketing, docs,
> design, etc. We definitely need to remove barriers to communications here.
There's a lightly used list called logistics@ that was originally
intended to allow contributors from multiple teams to have a
discussion concerning all involved wi
that had an open request, even if it hasn't gotten
> > pulled into a push yet. A recent improvement to this logic allows for
> > updates with a testing request to get obsoleted if a newer update gets
> > submitted before it gets "locked&q
read posts harder?
>
> FIX THAT HEADERS IN GENERAL - THE "--"-line needs to be "-- " for MUA's
> recognize it as signature and don't quote it all the time
Did you file this bug upstream?
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://pau
C they shouldn't automatically be foisted on any
user, just available for download.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeo
x27;s place to make exceptions when they serve
> greater Fedora goals, maybe that could work?
While that doesn't seem hostile, it seems just as unsustainable.
Setting a better baseline expectation for bundling makes more sense.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.f
gt; doled out by the FPC, I think package review should be able to handle
> it.
>
> This risks making somewhat harder to police egregious mis-behavior, but
> I am sure there are other ways to deal with offenders that willfully
> break reasonable rules.
Agreed.
--
Paul W. Frields
or
Fedora.
> >"Enforcement" implies adding more heavy process, which is part of the
> >problem this is trying to avoid.
> You don't seem to be aware about the fact FPC already tries to enforce
> unbundling. Yes, this is a heavy and time-consuming proces
ojects. And there, requiring Fedora infrastructure to be used
> > is very reasonable.
>
> Well, I guess we will agree to disagree then.
Agreed with kfenzi.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C
lly, pagure has some
functionality to allow bidirectional code movement with Github, which
gets the best of both worlds.
If someone doesn't like making a Github account, in the interim
they're still free to fork as would be usual for any repo (including
hundreds of projects we carry in Fedo
rdware these days to run a Workstation
experience, after all.
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247382
> [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-February/208368.html
> [3] https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/106
--
Paul W. Frields
o change. When teams see a change coming up
they know will cause them work or breakage, they can proactively reach
out to engage. In fact, anyone can facilitate such a conversation.
Also, a side note: A book I read on communication in relationships
once (I think it was "That's Not What
day it would
> mean going back to the state of Fedora Core 6
This isn't correct. The division of Core/Extras was based on who was
allowed to touch packages which isn't part of this proposal. That
wasn't a sustainable way to build community.
--
Paul W. Frields
omponent of OSAS also knows who they are, and
can contribute as needed to the application process.
Regardless of how critical the GSoC projects are, they're a good way
to mentor open source contribution. And as they say, the rising tide
lifts all ships.
If there are questions about the admin
he "new shiny stuff" anyway.
Announcing to the following should do the trick for those who haven't
boarded the F21 boat:
(1) announce@ (echoed to users@)
(2) Fedora Magazine (echoed per usual to social media)
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frie
is question on the devel@ list. David, did you
get what you needed offlist somewhere?
cc'ing Noriko since AIUI she is managing/leading the translation
migration here. It needs to be clear to developers what they need to
do in their toolchain. Without that clarity, t
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:55:58AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 12/08/2014 11:51 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > http://paste.fedoraproject.org/157737/18064529
> >
> > I had a bunch of 'sh: git: command not found' messages in a scratch
> > build I di
http://paste.fedoraproject.org/157737/18064529
I had a bunch of 'sh: git: command not found' messages in a scratch
build I did from an SRPM I uploaded, testing an epel7 build before
submitting the real thing. It's been a while -- are these messages
expected behavior?
--
However, I want to be clear that my being involved is *not* a
pre-requisite for that support. I would expect to support Matthew and
the Council regardless. I'm sure there are other worthy candidates,
and I'd work with any of them who fill this role.
--
Paul W. Frields
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 04:45:54PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 16:12:30 -0400
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 09/25/2014 04:02 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > > On T
;m sorry if that created any issue, and
I'm happy to hear that people in the EU have flexibility outside
summer.
Would it be worth asking organizers to allow anyone who thought August
was a harder requirement to update their bid? It should only take a
few days and it's hard to think that wo
where that people should post to for one-off advice and
> assistance (or to point out broken links on the web page), without
> wanting to subscribe and take a daily interest in l10n matters.
>
> If it doesn't serve that purpose, do we have something that *does*?
IRC Freenode
#x27;t know anything about an "arch" attribute.
> > > Assuming that this is actually correct, and that consuming tools know
> > > to expect such an attribute, I added support for this to comps.rng.
> >
> > No idea here. Dennis and/or other arm folks might
t;
> >
> > Many thanks to the hard work of the Fedora Infrastructure development team
>
> Amazing,
> thank you guys!
+1 -- congratulations on the new deployment and thanks for the superb
effort!
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg finge
b (operational) or
Twitter (social/advertising) doesn't help Fedora improve as a
hospitable platform.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrie
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 09:58:51AM -0600, inode0 wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:31 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > So let's not start by putting too much sacred value on the term
> > "Spin." Rather, let's think about what specific technical and
> >
too much sacred value on the term
"Spin." Rather, let's think about what specific technical and
community-building problems are caused by using Remixes, how to solve
them, and then consider that effort on balance against status quo.
--
Paul W. Frields
gh.
[...snip...]
Knowing Christian personally, I don't think he intended it that way.
But I think some people (I don't know about Christian) are frustrated
by the idea that any discussion of change is motivated by trying to
disenfranchise people, rather than figure out how Fedora can gener
nes. I suspect Robyn has done quite the
same wherever possible. It would be a step backward to make it harder
for people to readily identify any of the Fedora products with
Fedora.
This is really a suggestion for all the working groups, so I'm cc'ing
server@ and cloud@ lists too.
no "You must be this tall to ride Fedora Workstation" signs.
[...snip...]
Is it the intent that the developer cases here completely subsume the
case of a developer who is working primarily on Fedora itself
(including the Worsktation)? Perhaps we should call that out to
correctly priori
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:47:36PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:42:52 -0400
> "Paul W. Frields" escribió:
> > Hi Fedora folks,
> >
> > Hopefully some of you know me, possibly as a previous Fedora Project
> > Leader at Red Hat. If
= = =
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pfrields
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story
ze.
* * *
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/HistoricalSchedules
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open so
From the docs@ list, FYI, in case someone has some time in which they
can contribute to release notes for desktop, system daemons, web
servers, or for that matter any other existing beats:
- Forwarded message from "John J. McDonough" -
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 23:27 -0400, Christopher R. An
it'll ever hit stable.
If needed, the OP should be able to scratch-build the 1.7.0-2 packages
from the package git repository, or (hopefully) some later and
presumably improved 1.7.x version. +1 on the guarantee, but that
doesn't help the OP if he has converted repos. Caveat emptor.
. Bug filed:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/python-bugzilla/ticket/40
We should ask Will Woods when we can expect a new release -- it's been
~9 months since the last one, and several fixes I'd like are either in
the repo or waiting in tickets. This is a great one, thanks aj
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/qrencode
Is this package supposed to be critical path?[1] It's marked that way
for f16 and devel branch, but it was surprising to me.
* * *
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_Path_Packages
--
Paul W. Fr
ng in bugzilla.
Thanks Jussi. For your and other contributors' reference, we have a
[[Vacation]] wiki page where this information can be added as well. I
took the liberty of inserting Jussi's information on the page.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frield
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 08:28:20PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 31.08.2011 19:31, schrieb Paul W. Frields:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 05:39:14PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> this update should be really fast pushed out
> >>
> >> the demo-ex
Released
[...snip...]
The security bug is already being tracked:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2011-3192
I'd expect a new package to be issued shortly. Once that happens, if
you want to contribute to pushing this out, be ready to test the fixed
package and add karma. The pro
ichard,
>
> before you do it, read his post again and his insinuations about conspiracies
> and other staff !
[...snip...]
This thread really is starting to sound like personal vendetta and not
worthwhile discussion of technical details. Seriously, cut it out.
--
Paul W. Frields
s are probably available at the Transifex help
site: http://help.transifex.net/user-guide/
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeopl
witch-branch $branch" works...
> >
> > fedpkg switch-branch should be tweaked/fixed IMO.
>
> Perhaps I have to say that I'm still under F-12.
Chances are you're not running the latest fedora-packager code, then.
You probably want to either move up to
o extrude from every
> bit of your soul.
I agree with keeping things positive; let's also keep the thread
oriented on the technical and not the personal. (Informed by facts
wherever possible would also be great!)
Thanks for pointing out the fact that Fedora's mission includes
promoting
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:46:30AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 09:31:39PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> > Hello, Fedora people,
> >
> > Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feature
> > for Fedora 16?
> >
> >
is to me
because I previously gave him some tips on constructing a Fedora
feature page. :-) Discuss away!
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/
x27;s built-in recorder. (Just wanted to give botte a shout
for his work, though.) :-)
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.
se making the transition to
> systemd
Similarly for gsettings and dconf. However, I think the trick is
mitigating the problems that plague network-connected users. The type
of user who opens up a shell to make use of completion functions
starts looking a lot more like t
the actual problem's hard to see.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
Red Hat Summit/JBossWorld -- Register no
le on the ACL and commits list so I
thought it was worth a heads-up. Don't panic when you see the orphan
notices; John has agreed to take ownership already.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937
list?
Side note: any change would also need to make it into other places
such as the formal guides produced by Docs team, the wiki, etc.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://r
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:28:00PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 12:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey, all. I'd like to propose a special F15 schedule meeting for later
> > today or tomorrow; we'd need representation from QA and releng at a
> > minimum, ideally also d
or Fedora, and some of those are
tiny, one-off code drops that I worry will go unmaintained upstream in
the long run.
So in short, I don't think I'll be taking over python-mwlib.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D5
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:35:05AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 01/27/2011 01:12 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 09:30:24AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >>
> >> Disappointingly the slashdot story paraphrased another site that went
> >>
tead of the Fedora logo?)
They used to use the Red Hat logo -- would that count as a modest
improvement?
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http:/
gt;
> > > In any case, a new page looks very nice and modern :)
> >
> > Well, I went to see what you are talking about, from a F13 system with
> > Firefox 3.6.11, and the page is pretty garbled.
>
> And that picture of Paul Frields (I think) is pretty
get
> /etc/systemd/system/default.target
>
> or
>
> # ln -sf /lib/systemd/system/multi-user.target
> /etc/systemd/system/default.target
>
> isn't it? :-)
> BTW thanks for systemd.
> Kind regards
>
> sHINOBI
> --
> devel mailing list
>
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 08:41:45PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Paul W. Frields
> > wrote:
> > > I don't think anyone can generalize that the usage of Fedora is
> > > declin
27;t innovate at all without trying new things at some point.
That point ought to be based on something solid like the acceptance
criteria Bill's already writing up. Then FESCo can have more
confidence in making a decision about it. I'd rather concentrate on
that
dant upon it, like
> > sshd).
> > > Did I miss another mail ?
> >
> > related to this I guess ?
> >
> > [ 44.659412] init[1]: Failed to load configuration for
> > NetworkManager-by-dbus.service: No such file or directory
> > [ 44.659596] ini
nge the 'resample-method' parameter.
>
> Is there a recommended value for slow machines or a way to tell PA
> just to use the HW?
'man pulse-daemon.conf' reports that using 'trivial' is worst quality
but easier on slow machines.
--
Paul W. Frield
only
have to wait a few months for a release with it pre-packaged, if
they're not able to add it on their own.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - -
n't cause so much static.
[...]
ISTR this was much the case when we discussed Upstart at the FUDCon in
Raleigh, NC in 2008.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.co
ch can be done without
attacking people's skills, intelligence, foresight, or motives on
either side.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http:
Umm, that's copying one of the much-mocked things of Windows, where you
> click "Start" to shutdown. "systemd-install" to remove?
Shouldn't it be possible to have a similar "systemd-remove" that
resolves to the appropriate option?
--
Paul W. Frields
on-jinja2
> both BR: python-sphinx but are in the BR for that package. I've turned
> off doc generation for these for now; am waiting on repo to rebuild
> before I can build python-sphinx (deps appear to be ready).
>
> [snip]
>
> Hope this makes
;ve caused them to grumble for taking up my slack -- in which case
they know where to find my inbox to complain. :-)
* * *
[1] These happened both when I was a volunteer, and when I was a Red
Hat employee, FWIW.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
, Kyle
McMartin, and Steven M. Parrish are elected to FESCo for a full
two-release term.
* * *
Congratulations to the winning candidates, and thank you to each of
the nominees for running, and our volunteers and team members for
their assistance.
- --
Paul W. Frields
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 09:36:31PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 21:37:35 -0400,
> "Paul W. Frields" wrote:
> >
> > According to the release criteria[1], the decision was made to slip
> > the release of Fedora 13 by one week, to Tu
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Final_Release_Criteria
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/13/Schedule
- --
Paul W. Frields
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFL6gZfrNvJN70RNxcRAovhAJ4gCqmdpUPjxqcUeZT/9Rufm2T1gQCgjHKw
d3Iuc1YktqutAtkkB/zI3l0=
=TpN+
--
Hi Fedora paackager community,
Marc asked me to forward this to the list because of some mail account
issues. He's released ownership of the packages listed below.
Paul
- Forwarded message from Marc Wiriadisastra -
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 23:59:27 +0800
From: Marc Wiriadisastra
To: Paul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
With a Fedora release coming soon, it's also time for Fedora
Elections. Both the Fedora Project Board and the Fedora Engineering
Steering Committee (FESCo) will have open seats during this election
cycle.
Nominations for these seats open tomorrow, Sa
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:47:50AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 10:20 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > The Documentation team has prepared and posted a draft of the Fedora
> > 13 Release Notes for the Beta release:
> >
> > http://docs.fe
removed "Other OS" support from all PS3 units. Should the
> > Playstation line be removed as well?
>
> The Playstation is PPC anyway so regardless of what Sony is doing with
> the firmware update it should be removed.
Please visit the wiki and make the change.
list that are similar,
slow moving packages. Except for one that I think I should take a
closer look at massively upgrading in Rawhide or orphaning.
So thanks from me, too.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 A
r delete a paragraph, as
opposed to making minor tweaks inside a paragraph. Sometimes this may
not be possible, so just give it your best shot. Documentation folks
are almost always available on IRC Freenode #fedora-docs to help if
needed.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.f
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 10:58:02AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Paul W. Frields (sticks...@gmail.com) said:
> > I'd like to request that upon dropping features, FESCo notify the
> > Marketing and Docs lists. Both of these teams maintain content that
> > describe
g the devel@ list for FESCo notes.
Whether a feature is dropped at a milestone point or during the cycle,
this kind of notification would be very helpful for the many
volunteers working on those teams. Thanks for your consideration, and
for maintaining the feature process!
--
Paul W. Fr
gt; >
> > --
>
> Hi, is there a Known or Common Problems page for F13?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F13_bugs
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat
thon-morbid-0:0.8.7.3-1.fc12.noarch
> python-nevow-0:0.9.32-3.fc12.noarch
> python-pyrad-0:1.1-3.fc12.noarch
> python-sippy-0:1.0.1-1.fc12.noarch
> python-wokkel-0:0.6.3-1.fc12.noarch
> pyutil-0:1.6.1-4.fc12.noarch
> pywbem-0:0.7.0-3.fc12.noarch
> rhythmbox-upnp-0:0.
rst time and when taking into account the responsible person's
> attitude and position in Fedora.
I looked up the rel-eng SOP for mass branching and added this item to
it, which I'm betting took no more time than writing unnecessarily
hostile email. Be part of the solution.
https://fe
t engagement (i.e. get a fix), and we could have
a mutually positive exchange with them. By not giving them clear
information we're putting that opportunity at risk.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C9
es. But there
should be room for one or two non-feature related, important things
going on around the release.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 05:29:27PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> == Remediation ==
>
> A new update is being prepared to address this problem for Fedora 11
> and 12 users, and will be pushed to our mirrors as soon as possible.
> Us
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Fedora Project recently issued an update to the dnssec-conf
package, to fix an issue that caused Fedora 11 and 12 systems using
BIND (named) to put an inordinately heavy load on RIPE nameservers.
However, this update has been found to break some BI
distros.
>
> Please stop repeating this untrue statement. As I told you already, I
> have used separate /usr since RHL 3.0.3.
I've done this for a long time as well, though only on local disk, no
exotic configuration.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frield
y:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetworkManagerCmdline
>
> Can we still have that considered for F13, please ?
> The code is in rawhide already...
Yes, you can file a ticket with FESCo requesting an exception.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy/Exceptions
ugs should now be assigned to Red Hat people, where they
properly belong. The intention was never to dump these reviews on
volunteers, but rather for the engineers in the process to collaborate
with each other on the reviews. The net benefit to Fedora is that
hopefully we get packa
anuary/364162.html
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/364174.html
The solution Richard Hughes gave appears to have worked for the OP in
that thread, but I don't know the particular cause.
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
