- Original Message -
> From: "Jan Kratochvil"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Tomas Hozza"
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 6:19:16 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 application test suite – call for participation
>
Hi,
we are pleased to announce an alpha version of our network application
testsuite and we invite you to participate. We are especially interested in
tests for specific packages that contain client and/or server software that are
not included yet.
We are currently testing a small set of packa
- Original Message -
> From: "Toby Goodwin"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 10:20:00 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6 ready.
Definitely.
etr Spacek napsal(a):
> > On 3.11.2015 18:50, Moez Roy wrote:
> >> Hi Pavel Simerda,
> >>
> >> The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the
> >> attack surface):
> >>
> >> Bug 1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.i
- Original Message -
> From: "Major Hayden"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 8:24:46 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Peter Robinson"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:27:32 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> >> In the above page:
> >> * Network configuration: I see NetworkMan
- Original Message -
> From: "Moez Roy"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> , "Pavel Simerda"
>
> Cc: "Tore Anderson" , "Tomas Hozza" , "Paul
> Wouters"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6
- Original Message -
> From: "Josef Bacik"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Pavel Simerda" , "Paul Wouters"
> , "Tore Anderson"
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:56:42 PM
> Subject: R
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Cronenworth"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 10:37:59 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> On 10/29/2015 10:15 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote:
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Scott Schmit"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 2:10:41 AM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:15:10AM -0400, Pavel Simerd
- Original Message -
> From: "Chris Adams"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 9:30:12 PM
> Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas
>
> Once upon a time, Zach Villers said:
> > If it helps, Sixxs (https://www.sixxs.net/main
- Original Message -
> From: "Peter Robinson"
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking
Hi,
thanks for your feedback.
> In the above page:
> * Network configuration: I see NetworkManager in there but nothing
> about systemd-networkd
I used browser search in that page and 'system
Hi all,
I am writing to Fedora development mailing lists to get opinions
and ideas regarding our project on improving IPv6 support in
Fedora across its components.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking
Most prominent subpages:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking/Test_environm
- Original Message -
> From: "Václav Pavlín"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Bill Nottingham"
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 12:54:27 PM
> Subject: Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'
>
>
> On 6.12.2013 10:56, Jakub Filak wrote:
> > I'd like to add
> From: "Chris Adams"
> I prefer the "modern" secondaries vs. the old-style eth0:123, although I
> have run into vendor software (such as the Plesk web hosting control
> panel) that can't handle it. I expect if that was the "one true way" in
> some future version of RHEL, they'd adapt.
AFAIK wit
- Original Message -
> Jesus Christ
Unnecessary.
> The git repos are not available to ordinary users, nor
> are they easily accessible!
1) The command line way (with fedpkg)
sudo yum install @fedora-packager
fedpkg clone -a coreutils
2) The command line way (without fedpkg)
sudo yum i
- Original Message -
> From: "Dan Mashal"
> I have taken ownership of the following packages:
>
> gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme,
> dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media,
> gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also recently taking
- Original Message -
> From: "Reindl Harald"
> Am 05.02.2013 22:21, schrieb Luya Tshimbalanga:
> > On 05/02/13 12:09 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Gnome 3 is still Gnome. Both MATE and Cinnamon which came years
> > after Gnome 3 via Gnome-Shell, are reactionary for
> > self-interest becaus
- Original Message -
> From: "Nick Jones"
> In the summary of this Fedora feature for fixing name resolution is
> this snippet: "Fedora could be seen as the leader in linux networking"
Yep. My intention to improve the overall networking features is not limited to
what is described in Fix
- Original Message -
> Is the scope of this feature intended to cover both traditional
> (brctl)
> bridges and Open vSwitch (i.e. ovs-vsctl, ...) bridges?
Nope. We just support standard linux bridging (plus plain old bonding).
> Both types of
> bridging are supported by plugins for openst
> > = Features/Fix Network Name Resolution =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution
>
> Why would this be a Fedora issue
Isn't glibc used in Fedora for name resolution?
> or a feature?
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution#Rationale
- Original Message -
> From: "Miloslav Trmač"
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> wrote:
> > = Features/DualstackNetworking =
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking
>
> (Sending to the list instead of using the wiki talk page to hopefully
> gat
- Original Message -
> From: "William Brown"
> 4) For link local to work "nicely", mDNS name resolution should be
> installed and available by default. Avahi can provide such a service
> for ipv6.
Avahi doesn't work for IPv6 link-local addresses and GLIBC doesn't even allow
nss-mdns to w
- Original Message -
> From: "Tomasz Torcz"
> On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:18:19AM +1030, William Brown wrote:
> > > > = Features/DualstackNetworking =
> > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking
> >
> > 1) For a user, there is no option in NetworkManager to enable
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Adam Williamson"
>
> On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> > wrote:
> > > = Features/DualstackNetworking =
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking
> >
> > (Se
- Original Message -
> From: "William Brown"
>
> On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 00:01 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:48 PM, William Brown
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> >
26 matches
Mail list logo
