Re: IPv6 application test suite – call for participation

16 6:19:16 PM > Subject: Re: IPv6 application test suite – call for participation > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:29:06 +0100, Pavel Simerda wrote: > > https://github.com/pavlix/network-testing > -> > #dnf copr enable pavlix/network-testing > #dnf install netwo

IPv6 application test suite – call for participation

Hi, we are pleased to announce an alpha version of our network application testsuite and we invite you to participate. We are especially interested in tests for specific packages that contain client and/or server software that are not included yet. We are currently testing a small set of

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

ovements - request for ideas > > Dne 4.11.2015 v 13:24 Petr Spacek napsal(a): > > On 3.11.2015 18:50, Moez Roy wrote: > >> Hi Pavel Simerda, > >> > >> The IPv6 updates are breaking stuff (and probably increasing the > >> attack surface): > >

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Toby Goodwin" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 10:20:00 AM > Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas > > As well as Fedora itself, we need to get the infrastructure IPv6

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Chris Adams" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 9:30:12 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas > > Once upon a time, Zach Villers said: > > If

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Scott Schmit" <i.g...@comcast.net> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 2:10:41 AM > Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:15:10AM

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Michael Cronenworth" <m...@cchtml.com> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 10:37:59 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas > > On 10/29/2015 10:15 AM,

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Josef Bacik" <jo...@toxicpanda.com> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Cc: "Pavel Simerda" <psime...@redhat.com>, "Paul Wouters"

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Moez Roy" <moez@gmail.com> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>, "Pavel Simerda" > <psime...@redhat.com> > Cc: "Tore Anderson" &

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Peter Robinson" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2015 6:27:32 PM > Subject: Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas > > >> In the

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

t; Hash: SHA256 > > On 10/29/2015 10:15 AM, Pavel Simerda wrote: > > I am writing to Fedora development mailing lists to get opinions > > and ideas regarding our project on improving IPv6 support in > > Fedora across its components. > > I'd be more than happy to

Re: Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

- Original Message - > From: "Peter Robinson" > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking Hi, thanks for your feedback. > In the above page: > * Network configuration: I see NetworkManager in there but nothing > about systemd-networkd I used browser search

Fedora IPv6 testing and improvements - request for ideas

Hi all, I am writing to Fedora development mailing lists to get opinions and ideas regarding our project on improving IPv6 support in Fedora across its components. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Networking Most prominent subpages: *

Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard'

- Original Message - From: Václav Pavlín vpav...@redhat.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Cc: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 12:54:27 PM Subject: Re: ABRT in the comps group 'standard' On

Re: Minimal install diff from F16 to F19 (TC6)

From: Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net I prefer the modern secondaries vs. the old-style eth0:123, although I have run into vendor software (such as the Plesk web hosting control panel) that can't handle it. I expect if that was the one true way in some future version of RHEL, they'd adapt.

Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?

- Original Message - Jesus Christ Unnecessary. The git repos are not available to ordinary users, nor are they easily accessible! 1) The command line way (with fedpkg) sudo yum install @fedora-packager fedpkg clone -a coreutils 2) The command line way (without fedpkg) sudo yum

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19

- Original Message - From: Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com I have taken ownership of the following packages: gnome-icon-theme, gnome-backgrounds, libnotify, hicolor-icon-theme, dbus-python, gpointing-device-settings, gnome-media, gtk-solidity-settings, udisks in addition to also

Re: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution [Was: DualstackNetworking]

- Original Message - From: Nick Jones nick.fa.jo...@gmail.com In the summary of this Fedora feature for fixing name resolution is this snippet: Fedora could be seen as the leader in linux networking Yep. My intention to improve the overall networking features is not limited to what is

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

- Original Message - From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net Am 05.02.2013 22:21, schrieb Luya Tshimbalanga: On 05/02/13 12:09 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: Gnome 3 is still Gnome. Both MATE and Cinnamon which came years after Gnome 3 via Gnome-Shell, are reactionary for

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: NetworkManager Bridging Support

- Original Message - Is the scope of this feature intended to cover both traditional (brctl) bridges and Open vSwitch (i.e. ovs-vsctl, ...) bridges? Nope. We just support standard linux bridging (plus plain old bonding). Both types of bridging are supported by plugins for

Re: Reproposed F19 Feature: Fix Network Name Resolution [Was: DualstackNetworking]

= Features/Fix Network Name Resolution = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution Why would this be a Fedora issue Isn't glibc used in Fedora for name resolution? or a feature? See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FixNetworkNameResolution#Rationale Seems

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

- Original Message - From: William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 00:01 +, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:48 PM, William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au wrote: On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

- Original Message - From: Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:06 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Features/DualstackNetworking =

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

- Original Message - From: Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl On Thu, Jan 03, 2013 at 08:18:19AM +1030, William Brown wrote: = Features/DualstackNetworking = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking 1) For a user, there is no option in NetworkManager to

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

- Original Message - From: William Brown will...@firstyear.id.au 4) For link local to work nicely, mDNS name resolution should be installed and available by default. Avahi can provide such a service for ipv6. Avahi doesn't work for IPv6 link-local addresses and GLIBC doesn't even

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: DualstackNetworking - proper dual stack IPv4 and IPv6 networking

- Original Message - From: Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com wrote: = Features/DualstackNetworking = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DualstackNetworking (Sending to the list instead of using the wiki talk