Re: changing the name of a package

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https:/

Re: Question on creating system users/groups at install in spec file

I think you need %pre -n the same for %preun %post %postun or all systemd macros will not work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://d

Non-responsive python-evdev maintainer

Anyone have contact with Georgi Valkov (fas gvalkov)? He maintains python-evdev https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066959 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1985644 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: RPM Spec scriptlets

> On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 9:57 PM Paweł Marciniak wrote: > At first glance, this happens because you apply the scriptlets to the > wrong package. "%pre -n python3-%{github_name}" This is the missing part, thank you Fabio. > and you should probably also use the macros pro

RPM Spec scriptlets

Can someone tell me why none of the scriptlets (%pre, post etc) in the spec file https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/sunwire/rpmtest/fedora-35-x86_64/03364007-python-input-remapper/python-input-remapper.spec work? After building the package, all scriptlets are missing and rpm -q

All COPR rawhide builds have failed

All COPR rawhide builds have failed. It seems to be related to GPG keys. Importing GPG key 0x9867C58F: Userid : "Fedora (35) " Fingerprint: 787E A6AE 1147 EEE5 6C40 B30C DB46 3971 9867 C58F From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-35-primary Key imported succ

Re: Question on how to handle an upgrade case (vim-syntastic)

PS. rnc subpackage is still built. You should remove this line "#%add_subpackage -n rnc rnv" or replace with this line "#%%add_subpackage -n rnc rnv" Please note the additional percent sign. You should also remove unnecessary files. e.g. "rm -r syntax_checkers/rnc" And of course add obsoletes (se

Re: Question on how to handle an upgrade case (vim-syntastic)

> but do I also need to obsolete older versions of the > vim-syntastic-rnc subpackage? Yes, you have to. See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedo

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

> I submitted a pull request that mashes your patch, Colin Walter's > earlier pull reuqest, and some stuff I had worked on before into > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20047. Ok. Thanks, but you meant https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/20058 :) ___

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

> What log analysis tools is this change likely to break? If you set StatusUnitFormat to "name" or "description", then nothing will change and it will work as always. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: use unit names in systemd output by default?

I've written a code heavily based on the above-mentioned PR:15957 but I've added some missing code (new option StatusUnitFormat=combined). Now you can set StatusUnitFormat=combined in the configuration file or as a kernel command line argument systemd.status_unit_format=combined The output for

Re: Ways to contact wakko666 / Brett Lentz

Try https://twitter.com/brett_lentz or https://github.com/blentz ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/proj

Re: RPMLint 2.0 released!

> FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: > '/tmp/rpmlint.systemd.uqz1l_h2/usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/README' > → I'm not sure what's going on here. /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/README exists. I think the line https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpmlint/blob/2402248b1a2f4c77048a61d991537c9c

Re: How to apply a patch to the kernel 5.11.x

> is to add the contents of the patch to the existing (empty) > linux-kernel-test.patch > file. Thanks! It looks like this method works. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapro

How to apply a patch to the kernel 5.11.x

In kernel 5.10.x, it was enough to add the line for example "Patch 990: example.patch" to apply the patch. Now in 5.11.x it looks like this method doesn't work. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel

Re: Recompiling Packages with Optimization Flags

Of course, put all changes in the ~ / .rpmrc file. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-co

Re: Recompiling Packages with Optimization Flags

> Is there a way to pass '-march=znver2' to the compiler from rpmbuild?  I don't know but you can change the line: optflags: x86_64 %{__global_compiler_flags} -m64 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection from the file /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/rpmrc ___