Some Big Data packages in need of co-maintainers

2015-03-20 Thread Peter MacKinnon
Hello, I own some packages that have been neglected due to my work on other projects. It would be great to have some co-maintainers to keep these in good health in Fedora. All are reasonably up-to-date but as the hadoop package revs (a key dependency), I fear breakdowns in the not too distant

Re: koji rawhide broken: ImportError: cannot import name ProtocolError

2014-11-05 Thread Peter MacKinnon
blocked on this also. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8759/8048759/mock_output.log -- Peter MacKinnon Emerging Technologies Red Hat Inc. Raleigh, NC -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Con

Re: Orphaning json_simple

2014-09-15 Thread Peter MacKinnon
hard where I need to learn all the maven macro stuff to fix bugs. Happy to maintain while trivial though can't justify more. Steve. josh I will take this please. -- Peter MacKinnon CTO Office: Big Data Red Hat Inc. Raleigh, NC -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

JavaScript bundling (was Re: F21 System Wide Change: Cockpit Management Console)

2014-04-11 Thread Peter MacKinnon
ounce -- Peter MacKinnon MRG Grid/Big Data Red Hat Inc. Raleigh, NC -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

2013-07-26 Thread Peter MacKinnon
interests. I can envision oversight and policy implementation in the Ring/SIG model however. That's why the "lets build some core platform and put stuff on top of it" is flawed. I'm sorry but I can't agree that software layering is somehow inherently "flawed&quo

Re: Bundling (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))

2013-07-24 Thread Peter MacKinnon
On 07/24/2013 11:03 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Mer 24 juillet 2013 16:17, Peter MacKinnon a écrit : A generalization which I would disagree with in the Java space. I think many projects eventually reach "steady-state" where they have acquired the set of dep bundles they need

Bundling (was Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk))

2013-07-24 Thread Peter MacKinnon
New thread to get clear of some of the flames and wreckage... On 07/23/2013 05:25 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 03:34:15PM -0400, Peter MacKinnon wrote: Well, compat libraries are certainly an option but I view that as a tactical solution to an institutional, um

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

2013-07-23 Thread Peter MacKinnon
On 07/23/2013 12:58 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 05:54:27PM -0400, Peter MacKinnon wrote: So far, so good...sort of. We can make the basic use case and tests work with the modified dependencies but in doing so we risk giving up parity with the Apache baseline (including

Re: RFC: Proposal for a more agile "Fedora.next" (draft of my Flock talk)

2013-07-22 Thread Peter MacKinnon
e proposals that could help relieve our initiative's pain points, and look forward to further constructive discussion of the same. My $0.02, \Pete -- Peter MacKinnon MRG Grid/Big Data Red Hat Inc. Raleigh, NC -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel