Re: About Fedora containers

2022-07-11 Thread Petr Hracek
Hi Alejandro, we have developed an easy GitHub Action [1]. The example how to use it is already mentioned in README.md [2]. All our images are automatically by merging PR pushed into Quay.io. See an examples GitHub Action here [3]. As you can see the nginx-container image is automatically pushed

Fwd: Fedora Developer Portal release

2017-03-01 Thread Petr Hracek
go/go-programs.html [4] https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/database/mongodb/about.html [5] https://github.com/developer-portal/content/issues Regards, -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer EMEA ENG Mainstream RHEL Red Hat, Inc. email: phra...@redha

Re: Fedora Developer Portal - new update

2016-10-04 Thread Petr Hracek
Fix references to official Fedora Developer Portal. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Petr Hracek wrote: > Hi folks, > > after a couple of months we have updated Fedora Developer Portal > which contains several fixes and new contents > > New contents: > - Rust language [

Fedora Developer Portal - new update

2016-10-04 Thread Petr Hracek
l [5] https://developer.stg.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/c/gtk.html -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer EMEA ENG Mainstream RHEL Red Hat, Inc. Mob: +420 777 056 169 email: phra...@redhat.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscr

Fedora Developer Portal as a application

2016-05-31 Thread Petr Hracek
es/41 -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc. Mob: +420 777 056 169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Developer-portal] Re: Preparing a new release of Fedora Developer Portal - asking for feedback

2016-04-28 Thread Petr Hracek
. Note : https://techbase.kde.org is translatable, same for https://developer.gnome.org/languages Le 2016-04-22 08:50, Robert Mayr a écrit : Ok, I'm fine with that. I was just bringing up a question we discussed time ago and I'm asked sometimes by L10n folks. Thanks for confirm

Re: [Developer-portal] Re: Preparing a new release of Fedora Developer Portal - asking for feedback

2016-04-21 Thread Petr Hracek
aproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/websi...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Annoucing Fedora Developer Portal mailing list

2016-02-19 Thread Petr Hracek
] https://github.com/developer-portal/content -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel

rebase-helper 0.7.0 with upstream-monitoring support

2016-01-15 Thread Petr Hracek
/ [3] https://github.com/fedora-infra/the-new-hotness/pull/94 [4] https://partner-bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259391 -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http

Update Fedora Developer Portal

2015-12-21 Thread Petr Hracek
oject.org/tools/abrt/about.html [4]https://getfedora.org/ [5]http://developer.fedorainfracloud.org/ [6]http://developer.fedorainfracloud.org/start.html [7]https://github.com/developer-portal/ [8]https://github.com/developer-portal/website [9]https://github.com/developer-portal/content -- Petr Hrace

Re: Fedora Developer Portal - released !!!!

2015-11-02 Thread Petr Hracek
On 11/02/2015 02:46 PM, Petr Hracek wrote: On 11/02/2015 02:43 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: Hello folks, I am happy to announce that Fedora Developer Portal is released. Official web address is http://developer.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Developer Portal - released !!!!

2015-11-02 Thread Petr Hracek
On 11/02/2015 02:43 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Petr Hracek <mailto:phra...@redhat.com>>wrote: Hello folks, I am happy to announce that Fedora Developer Portal is released. Official web address is http://developer.fedoraproject.org. ​Great!

Fedora Developer Portal - released !!!!

2015-11-02 Thread Petr Hracek
/developer-portal/content [6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/Developer [7] http://blog.samalik.com/fedora-developer-portal-prototype/ [8] http://phracek.livejournal.com/1403.html -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email:phra...@redhat.com

rebase-helper updated to 0.6.0 from rawhide till F22

2015-08-11 Thread Petr Hracek
s [1] https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper [2] https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper/blob/master/README.md#rebase-helper-workflow -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list

netpbm updated to 10.71.02 in rawhide and F23

2015-08-11 Thread Petr Hracek
C (my freenode nick is 'phracek') and I'll be happy to help. [1] https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/netpbm.txt [2] https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/netpbm-devel.txt [3] https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/netpbm-doc.txt [4] https://phracek.fedorapeople.org/netpbm-progs.txt Thanks, Petr Hr

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-22 Thread Petr Hracek
On 07/21/2015 04:00 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Jonathan Wakely <mailto:jwak...@redhat.com>>wrote: On 21/07/15 15:45 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote: Feel free to send us any comment or improvements. We would like to improve Fedora for d

Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Petr Hracek
tal/content [5] https://github.com/developer-portal/website -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: Problem with multiple monitors

2015-07-17 Thread Petr Hracek
vious session? -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Problem with multiple monitors

2015-07-16 Thread Petr Hracek
in to previous session or I do not know how:( Any idea what could be a wrong? -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email:phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel F

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-06-03 Thread Petr Hracek
029030.html [1b] http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-April/031013.html [2] http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/SystemUpdates/ [3] It works just fine in F21, if you're feeling brave.. -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob:

Re: fedup for F23 and beyond

2015-05-29 Thread Petr Hracek
stemUpdates/ [3] It works just fine in F21, if you're feeling brave.. -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

rebasehelper 0.5.0 version

2015-05-27 Thread Petr Hracek
-helper into upstream monitoring service. - adding ABIchecker for comparing RPM packages. Currently pkgdiff. [1] https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper Thank you Tomas for helping with rebase-helper -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra

Re: New Upstream Release Monitoring Systems

2015-04-21 Thread Petr Hracek
On 02/24/2015 05:58 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote: In our project called rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper we would like to analyze a new upstream version against an old upstream version and let user now what is changed

Re: Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-04-16)

2015-04-16 Thread Petr Hracek
://mattdm.org/fedora/2015status/rings2015.svg this is part of a blog post I'm writing and doesn't make _complete_ sense out of context, but is very pretty. :) -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing

Re: New Upstream Release Monitoring Systems

2015-04-14 Thread Petr Hracek
On 02/24/2015 05:58 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 12:33:29PM +0100, Petr Hracek wrote: In our project called rebase-helper https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper we would like to analyze a new upstream version against an old upstream version and let user now what is changed

Preupgrade-assistant assessment tool for upgrades in Fedora (does NOT replace FedUp)

2015-03-10 Thread Petr Hracek
/page/SCE -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer Experience Red Hat, Inc Mob: +420777056169 email: phra...@redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: New Upstream Release Monitoring Systems

2015-02-24 Thread Petr Hracek
r now what is changed. E.g. Binaries are missing, soname bump change, header files are missing etc. Is there any possibility how to integrate a tool (e.g. rebase-helper) to upstream release monitoring system? Thanks for the good and hard work again. -- Petr Hracek Software Engineer Developer

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Preupgrade Assistant

2014-12-15 Thread Petr Hracek
On 12/15/2014 09:18 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: On 12/11/2014 03:06 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained: Preupgrade Assistant = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Preupgrade_Assistant Change owner(s): Petr Hracek The Preugrade Assistant is a tool to help people upgrade

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Preupgrade Assistant

2014-12-12 Thread Petr Hracek
On 12/12/2014 10:01 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2014-12-12, Petr Hracek wrote: On 12/11/2014 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: Will this handle packages that have been dropped but not obsoleted in the next release? Yes definitely. The tool or respectively contents (which are part of this tool

Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Preupgrade Assistant

2014-12-12 Thread Petr Hracek
On 12/11/2014 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 15:06:25 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained: Preupgrade Assistant = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Preupgrade_Assistant Change owner(s): Petr Hracek The Preugrade Assistant is a tool to help

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Petr Hracek
te: HI On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: No, definitely not. preupgrade-assistant is only the tool which informs user or admin what was change against the newest version and recommend actions for inplace upgrades. But as I mentioned. Currently now it's not

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Petr Hracek
Or better say, fedup remains as tool for upgrades. On 09/30/2014 03:57 PM, Petr Hracek wrote: No, definitely not. preupgrade-assistant is only the tool which informs user or admin what was change against the newest version and recommend actions for inplace upgrades. But as I mentioned

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Petr Hracek
all. On 09/30/2014 03:50 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Hi On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: In RHEL we are using preupgrade-assistant [1] which does this work. If user write a check script then it will inform user that upgrade is not supported. The check scrip

Re: How to handle upgrades to Fedora 21

2014-09-30 Thread Petr Hracek
ode of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Rebase-helper in Fedora 20

2014-07-04 Thread Petr Hracek
on IRC: #rebase-helper or to us. Contact persons (alphabetically): - Jiri Popelka (jpopelka) - Tomas Hozza (thozza) - Petr Hracek (phracek) Rebase-helper team Greetings Petr -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: free seats in Env and Stacks WG - volunteers wanted

2014-07-04 Thread Petr Hracek
tool soon (https://github.com/phracek/rebase-helper) https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rebase-helper/ I am also the owner of preupgrade-assistant package but it is releated to RHEL especially. Greetings Petr -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing

Re: Packages installing files to /etc/rpm

2014-02-03 Thread Petr Hracek
On 31/01/14 21:23, Ville Skyttä wrote: phracek emacs jgu,phracek Fixed -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: really stop "really" commits (really!)

2013-12-16 Thread Petr Hracek
e.org/patchcheck.py Would it be possible to hook it up with fedpkg by default so that all Fedora packagers get this functionality? Rahul Yeah, it would be awesome to include the check into fedpkg. Currently now I did the issue as well:( -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing

Re: separation emacs-common into more packages

2013-09-10 Thread Petr Hracek
On 09/10/2013 02:15 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:54:47 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote: Hi folks, I would like to separate emacs-common into more packages (in rawhide currently). emacs-common contains all lisp files, info and man pages Do you think that it is a good idea to

separation emacs-common into more packages

2013-09-10 Thread Petr Hracek
/share/emacs/24.3/lisp/calc /usr/share/emacs/24.3/lisp/language $ -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

default applications in Fedora

2013-08-13 Thread Petr Hracek
tings -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: DeveloperAssistant and android development under Fedora 19

2013-08-09 Thread Petr Hracek
ing to be based on IntelliJ: http://developer.android.com/sdk/installing/studio.html -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: DeveloperAssistant and android development under Fedora 19

2013-08-08 Thread Petr Hracek
On 08/08/2013 09:50 PM, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: 2013/8/8 Petr Hracek : Hi folks, Hi, I would like to ask you what are necessary steps to develop android applications under Fedora. I suppose that Eclipse environment is needed. Any other package(s)? Is there any guide how to

DeveloperAssistant and android development under Fedora 19

2013-08-08 Thread Petr Hracek
Fedora. Any hints will be welcome. -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Developer Assistant GUI

2013-07-16 Thread Petr Hracek
assistants. On 07/15/2013 02:52 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Developer Assistant GUI = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DeveloperAssistantGUI Change owner(s): Petr Hracek , Bohuslav Kabrda The feature aims to provide GUI for devassistant package. == Detailed

Review-Request libtiff3 compatibility package

2013-06-26 Thread Petr Hracek
Hi community, can anybody make the review request of libtiff3 compatibility package? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=978345 Thanks in advance -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-06-17 Thread Petr Hracek
On 06/13/2013 01:26 PM, Petr Hracek wrote: On 05/30/2013 07:48 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: 2013-05-30 10:07, Petr Hracek skrev: Ok, well. It seems that libpng15 compatibility package is built in rawhide. What are the next steps? Tagged already built libpng(1.6) package? I do not want to break

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-06-13 Thread Petr Hracek
On 05/30/2013 07:48 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: 2013-05-30 10:07, Petr Hracek skrev: Ok, well. It seems that libpng15 compatibility package is built in rawhide. What are the next steps? Tagged already built libpng(1.6) package? I do not want to break rawhide completely and I would like to avoid

Re: Fedora Hosted Usability and Developer Experience

2013-06-04 Thread Petr Hracek
27;t got time to ask for permission to publicly quote this person about this on the list, but if you are the person and want the attribution, feel free to say it :) -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Review request of vim-javabrowser package

2013-06-03 Thread Petr Hracek
Hi folks, can anybody make the review request of vim-javabrowser package? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961384 Thank you in advance -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-05-30 Thread Petr Hracek
On 05/30/2013 10:07 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: On 05/22/2013 09:51 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: Thank you for really deep explanation. We had discussion how to do that issue and we will created a side tag for that. Compatibility package will not be needed and BZ will be closed. Best regards / S

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-05-30 Thread Petr Hracek
On 05/22/2013 09:51 AM, Petr Hracek wrote: Thank you for really deep explanation. We had discussion how to do that issue and we will created a side tag for that. Compatibility package will not be needed and BZ will be closed. Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek On 05/21/2013 03:43 PM

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-05-23 Thread Petr Hracek
On 05/23/2013 10:23 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 11:01 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote: The issue is that once this is in, all the 306 packages above will have broken dependencies. And it's not just simple rebuilds tha

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-05-22 Thread Petr Hracek
On 05/22/2013 10:39 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: 2013-05-17 12:20, Petr Hracek skrev: Hi folks, in order that BZ (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963113) libpng library was bumped. [snip] Please rebuild your packages with new

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-05-22 Thread Petr Hracek
Thank you for really deep explanation. We had discussion how to do that issue and we will created a side tag for that. Compatibility package will not be needed and BZ will be closed. Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek On 05/21/2013 03:43 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: 2013-05-20 09:03, Petr

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-05-20 Thread Petr Hracek
Just a one short question. You are talking about side tag. Could you please describe me what are you talking about? It seems like I am a newbie. Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek On 05/17/2013 09:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 08:58 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-05-19 Thread Petr Hracek
No the list was taken from Fedora 18 (my desktop). You are right, that some packages were added / removed and therefore list is not completed. Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek On 05/17/2013 03:48 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:20:03 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote

Re: Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-05-17 Thread Petr Hracek
Hello, I have just created Review request in BZ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964161 libpng was untagged by koji. Thank you in advance for help. Best regards / S pozdravem Petr Hracek On 05/17/2013 01:38 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: 2013-05-17 13:17, Kalev Lember skrev: The issue

Soname bump libpng (rawhide) - new libraries libpng.16.so and libpng16.so.16.2.0

2013-05-17 Thread Petr Hracek
1-9.fc18.src xtide-0:2.13-2.fc18.src xu4-0:1.1-0.18.20120106svn2999.fc18.src xulrunner-0:17.0.1-1.fc18.src xzgv-0:0.9.1-6.fc18.src zint-0:2.4.3-4.fc18.src zita-at1-0:0.2.3-7.fc18.src zita-rev1-0:0.2.1-6.fc18.src zvbi-0:0.2.33-14.fc18.src $> Thank you in advance -- Best regards / S pozdravem Petr H