smc-fonts upstream changed license of AnjaliOldLipi fonts from GPL+ to
OFL 1.1. The update will be in smc-fonts-6.1-3 package.
--
Rajeesh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/c
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 21 October 2014 12:55, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
>> smc-fonts failed to process with 'unrecognized contents' message
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hughsie/createrepo_as_logs/master/s/smc-fonts-common.log
&
On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 17 October 2014 10:22, pravin@gmail.com wrote:
>> Will be very helpful if you can add "how to test" information as well. i.e.
>> after local install package will appear in gnome-software something in bit
>> detail.
>
> You can't actu
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 11:22 AM, pravin@gmail.com
wrote:
>
>
> On 16 October 2014 15:14, Richard Hughes wrote:
>>
>> If you maintain a font in Fedora, or are a provenpackager, I could
>> really need your help this weekend. Basically, we want to implement
>> AppStream metadata[1] for all the
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
>>> Bluez4 and Bluez5 are not parallel-installable, and incompatible, so
>>> other applications relying on Bluez4 will need to be ported by their
>>> respective maintainers.
>
> Impact on KDE?
>
Probably not much as the upstream developers ar
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
> I've reported a X11 bug system, I'm using KDE on F15, if you suffers
> the same problem, it could be great take a look at
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726982
> Sorry if it's duplicated
I assume you have an Intel graphics ca
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Raghu Siddarth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am packaging a program that has two front ends, one for Gtk and other for
> Qt.
>
> Is there a standard packaging structure to handle such packages?
I guess you can take a look at how "transmission" does this...
>
> I see two
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:00 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Having been not terribly impressed with GNOME 3 in F-15 alpha, I thought
> I'd try installing the beta with KDE, just to see if the grass is any
> greener. I'm still trying to find my way around that one too, but
> I've run into one significant
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For GNOME 3 to more reliably do application tracking, we will be
> associating through startup-notification. Some background here:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2010-February/011321.html
>
> However for startup notifi
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Rajeesh K Nambiar
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
>>> > Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
>>> >> Any pointers on how to migrate the 'enable touchpad tap-to-click'
>>> >> feature
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 21:47 +0530, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
>
>> > That's because you're misreading Rahul's claims. Rahul was replying to a
>> > post which claimed Fedora has a 'policy' of b
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 11:15 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> > We have a written down policy that specifically recommends that our
>> > maintainers consider the issue of regressions seriously and not push
>> > every ups
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 7:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
>> I must be looking at the wrong places then... I could find no 4.4+
>> RPMs either in one of the mirrors:
>> http://apt.de.kde-redhat.org/kde-redhat/fedora/12/i386/unstable/RPMS/
>
> 4
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Thomas Janssen
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Janssen
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Rajeesh K Nambiar
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>>> On 03/05
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/05/2010 10:16 AM, Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
>> Does that mean if Fedora N is released with KDE 4.x, the users get
>> 4.x+1 only in Fedora N+1? It sounds diagonally opposite to the
>> latest-and-greatest, bleeding
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 9:50 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
[...]
> 3. adjust plans/policy wrt kde upgrades.
> a. implement kde stability proposal as is (to limit 4.x type upgrades to at
> most one per fedora release)
>
> b. simply do new 4.x versions only for fn+1? pros: less chance to disrupt
> curren
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 4:29 AM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
>> > Rajeesh K Nambiar wrote:
>> >> Any pointers on how to migrate the 'enable touchpad tap-to-click'
>> >> feature from the existing .fdi file(s)?
>
> Section "InputClass"
>
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> options as specified. That's just one example, I've tried to detail the new
> configurations on our wiki.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Input_device_configuration
> If you think there's anything missing, please let me know or add it
> yo
18 matches
Mail list logo
