Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide

> Packages which need to be rebuilt: > calligra > gambas3 > gdal > gdcm > inkscape > kf5-kitinerary > libreoffice > pdf2djvu > scribus Poppler update almost always results in rebuilding TeXLive (due to pdfTeX) too. I was wondering how the ‘bootstrap’ build is done when that

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync Without modules enabled, works fine here: dnf --releasever=37

Re: RFI/RFC: Fedora Linux graphical recovery environment

> So I come to y'all to ask about this and give us some feedback on the > idea, how to do it, and what kinds of things you expect people to need > a recovery environment for. As somebody used to often get a knock on the door past midnight in the early 2000’s because some guy in the hostel borked

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

> > I remember seeing 60-70% reduction really often, and 90+ periodically. I've > > read Kevin's explanation of why it's not working as well now, but I wonder > > what changed between the early implementation when results were very good > > and now, when they really aren't. > > I think it's

Re: deltarpm usefulness?

> > It is not always about speed. There are still plenty of places in the > > world where people are on limited data plans and to them using delta > > rpms makes a lot of sense. They can work with slow speeds but not with > > high data expenses. So i feel turning it on by default and having a > >

Re: Missing package build for Fedora 34

> Yes, just build python-cffsubr-0.2.8-3.fc34. Many thanks! Just built a new release and pushed the update to testing. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

Missing package build for Fedora 34

Hello package wranglers, I maintain the python-cffsubr package for Fedora. It was added to the repo and built on 2021-03-17 (during the beta freeze timeline of Fedora 34). The package was built for f33, f34 & f35; see [1]. But probably because of beta freeze, the f34 build didn’t go to repo.

Re: KDE Autostart in F34

> > Thanks Vitaly. We will look into converting it to systemd-user unit. > > I believe that would work for all other desktop managers as well. > > Yeah, you might want to ship both a systemd unit and an XDG autostart > file for the time being. There will still be graphical desktops > environments

Re: Delta RPMs in Fedora 34

> Is it really saving bandwidth, though? The reported savings are > generally very small for me. Downloading the metadata costs something > as well. In F33, mostly so. I generally keep up to date (update once a week), but available deltarpms have been lesser compared to earlier versions. I used

Re: Heads up: gssdp and gupnp API changes coming to rawhide

> OK, I'm all done with the gupnp stack updates and everything is merged > into rawhide now. All dependent packages are rebuilt/fixed, with the > exception of 'meiga' (maintainers CC'd). I'm not going to fix meiga > myself as it looks like a dead package to me. My recommendation for the >

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

> > What additional information would you like to know? > Like what you were running etc because i didn't notice anything that weird > on my end.Sorry for the delay have been busy with college work. > The processes run are listed in the mail on 16 July. The apps are mostly Firefox with half a

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 12:52 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Can you give some more details as those would help Investigate the problem > better. > What additional information would you like to know? [P.S.: please avoid top-posting.] -- Rajeesh ___

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On 7/19/18, Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Good to here there haven't been any breakages. > > I will look into the swapper process issue asap. Thanks. Output from $perf top -F 49 16.19% [kernel] [k] sdhci_irq 7.72% [unknown] [.]

Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations

On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 10:33 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > The Actual Url > > FYI, have been running kernel 4.18.0-0.rc0.git10.1.fc28.x86_64 since a day, haven't noticed any breakages :-) But

Re: F28 : KDE multi-monitor issues

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 6:16 AM Pawel Veselov wrote: > Hello. > > There are a couple of things that's been annoying me in KDE for a > while, and I'd like to poke around and understand how I can help > making them any better. > > 1. Which is not as bad, but still, is the screen power. It seems to

Re: Missing font information at wiki

> > > > > I'd try to write a page generator that'd turn appdata files into > > html. Might be useful for more than fonts. That doesn't even seem > > like that much work, to write such a script and have it run once a > > week and update the html for all updated packages and push it out to > > a

Re: Touchpad pointer accel - testers required, scratch build available

On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:05 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > I've been playing with touchpad pointer acceleration in libinput again and > finally found something I'm happy with. Most notably it has a wide range of > configurable speed settings, from "tar" to "speed-skating ring". Please > give > this

Re: julietaula-montserrat-fonts failure on Fedora 22 and EPEL7-

On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 9:12 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > It looks like a failure using this line from build[1]: > > RPM build errors: > File not found by glob: >

Re: F23: Copr build failure: glibc

Copr fails to build for F23 (i686, x86_64) due to error: Error: Package glibc-2.21.90-21.fc23.x86_64.rpm is not signed For instance see the build log https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rajeeshknambiar/kf5-k de-apps/fedora-23-x86_64/plasma-volume-control-5.3.90-1.fc22/root.log

F23: Copr build failure: glibc

Hello, Copr fails to build for F23 (i686, x86_64) due to error: Error: Package glibc-2.21.90-21.fc23.x86_64.rpm is not signed For instance see the build log https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/rajeeshknambiar/kf5-kde-apps/fedora-23-x86_64/plasma-volume-control-5.3.90-1.fc22/root.log

Re: Testers needed: KDE kcm_touchpad libinput support

On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 7:45 AM, Peter Hutterer peter.hutte...@who-t.net wrote: Please add this copr https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/whot/kcm_touchpad/ KF5 based builds with libinput support are available in the copr http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rajeeshknambiar/kf5-kde-apps/