Exiv2 0.28.2

Hello, I've assembled all the deps, I will rebuild exiv2 0.28.2 in f41-build-side-91095 with all its reverse deps. May take a while. Have a great evening and take care, Robert-André -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsu

Re: Review request for gmobile

On 08/06/2024 07:09, Tomi Lähteenmäki wrote: Hi, I sent a review request for gmobile [1] a bit over two weeks ago. The gmobile is written in C and it is dependency of phosh and phoc and upcoming phrog package. If someone would have time to review the request it would be great. -Tomi [1]

Re: Intent to bump SVT-AV1

On 27/05/2024 13:04, Bob Mauchin wrote: Hello, This week, I will rebuild svt-av1 and its dependencies in a side tag. Tests were done this weekend on COPR and compatibility with FFmpeg 6.1.1 was determined to be functional. I will need the help from RPM fusion people. Libheif and Libheif-f

Re: Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

On 21/05/2024 15:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote: tl;dr I screwed up and accidentally made two critical mistakes: 1) Node.js 22 got into Rawhide as the default early. I'm not sure of how to back that out safely. 2) A change made in Node.js 20 to split out two libraries (cjs-module-lexer and undici)

Error while trying to rebuild PCMANFM-Qt

Hello guys, So this week-end the project is to rebuild exiv2 to the latest version so I can see my brotli-compressed EXIF data from my JPEG-XL pictures in Gwenview. As part of this task, I am rebuilding the dependent packages because of SONAME bump. I am stuck on PCMANFM-Qt rebuilt : CMake

EXIV2 BMFF Patents situation

Hello, In order to update Exiv2, we need to know if this is okay to enable BMFF support. Patents have theoretically expired and it is enabled by default in the latest version. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1979565 https://github.com/Exiv2/exiv2/issues/1679 Upstream seems to thi

Re: SPDX Statistics - Miracle of the Sun edition

On 10/13/23 08:15, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Hot news: There was new release of SPDX License list. If you want to see impact of Fedora work you can check number of new licenses in recent releases and compare https://github.com/spdx/license-list-XML/releases and compare it with content of the rel

SPDX short name for "Redistributable, no modification permitted" (firmware)

Hi, I'm doing a MR on an old package that contains firmware data. I wanna convert to SPDX, what is the equivalent to "Redistributable, no modification permitted" in SPDX. The license is: The files in the directory src/miniloader are provided pursuant to the following license agreement:

Lastpass-cli license correction

Hello Fedoreans an others, Lastpass-cli license will be corrected from GPL-2.0-only to: GPL-2.0-only WITH cryptsetup-OpenSSL-exception AND OpenSSL In the next 1.3.5 update. Which will hopefully makes the program functional again. Best regards, Robert-André ___

Re: Simple review swap: python-pygments-git

On 8/29/23 13:40, Ankur Sinha wrote: Hi folks, Would someone like to swap reviews please? I'd like to get python-pygments-git reviewed. They are pygments lexers for git output and files. The review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2229721 It should be a simple review, so un

Re: Self Introduction: Adam Piasecki

On 8/24/23 15:48, Adam Piasecki wrote: Hello everyone, I hope this message finds you all well! My name is Adam Piasecki, and I've recently joined this mailing list to further immerse myself in such a vibrant open-source community ;) I joined Red Hat in 2022 as an intern, and ever since one thin

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F38 to F39

On 8/23/23 20:22, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 39 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releaseve

Warning: DNF is unprotected

Hello, Just a heads-up: for the upgrade to DNF5 in F39, we unprotected the DNF package, which leaves all of our users vulnerable to a removal of DNF. And since the delaying of DNF5, we haven't re-protected it. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/commit/352b174a0b4ce2048ef1a25b785f2

Re: RPM packaging help

On 8/13/23 17:30, Andrew Heath wrote: Robert, Thank you,  this is very helpful, so I guess the questions I have is if I'm reading your email correctly 1. Is for now we need to deal with the vendor directory, but should start working to packaging some of the go-lang dependencies as rpms? Y

Re: RPM packaging help

On 8/10/23 15:43, Andrew Heath wrote: All, My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team and we are trying to create some RPMs for some projects that we are working on, one of the RPMs we need to create is for the Ansible receptor[1 ]

Re: RPM packaging help

On 8/10/23 15:43, Andrew Heath wrote: All, My name is Andrew, and I have been working with the Fedora Infra team and we are trying to create some RPMs for some projects that we are working on, one of the RPMs we need to create is for the Ansible receptor[1 ]

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired this week

On 8/5/23 12:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 01. 08. 23 23:48, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On 7/31/23 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired this week

On 7/31/23 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen this week. Policy:

Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

On 3/19/23 12:56, Sérgio Basto wrote: BTW add me (sergiomb) as co-maintainer (admin) for built libjxl for EPEL 8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170821 Added you. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe s

JPEGXL SONAME Bump

Hello everyone, I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week Saturday the 25th. Some of you will be affected by these changes. Fedora side we have: geeqie gthumb seamonkey vips I can take care of these one as a PP in a side tag RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected

(Golang) Reviews swap pretty please

Hello, I need help to review the ORAS stack needed for Ariga and others: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140707 Review Request: golang-github-need-being-tree - Pretty print trees in Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2140708 Review Request: golang-oras - Work with OCI

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for olem

On 9/22/22 01:10, Maxwell G wrote: On Fri Sep 2, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote: Sep 2, 2022 5:36:41 AM Fabio Valentini : Does anybody know whether olem still wants to maintain their Fedora packages? I'm fairly sure that they no longer wish to maintain Fedora packages. I reached out to them

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

On 9/12/22 14:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releaseve

Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: Hi all, As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4  to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8. This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect all dependent packages to be automat

Fedora SCM requests on the weekend

Hello, I know a lot of you are working on Fedora during the week days, but for some of us, the weekend is the only time we can spend time on it. The problem is, SCM requests are rarely processed during that time, most of them get stuck from Friday afternoon to Monday afternoon (CEST), so it re

Looking for 2 review swaps

Hi, I'm looking to get review of these two packages: #2103380 NEW- nob...@fedoraproject.org - Review Request: rust-cradle - Execute child processes with ease https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103380 which depends on: #2103367 NEW- nob...@fedoraproject.org - Review

Re: Meld directory compare still broken in f36

On 6/24/22 10:49, Andrea Musuruane wrote: Hi,     meld directory compare in f36 is broken. I opened a bug report last month: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091377 Some days later, kiilerix provided a PR to fix this issue: ht

Re: release-monitoring.org 1.4.0 is now live

On 6/22/22 17:36, Michal Konecny wrote: Hi everyone, today was deployed 1.4.0 version of https://release-monitoring.org. Here is a highlight of some of the changes: *Features* * Add link to AlmaLinux package to distribution mapping * Add sourceforge (git) backend to retrieve git tags * Add Pyth

Re: Media codecs big SONAME bump

On 6/20/22 13:08, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hello everyone, I am planning a soname bump of various media codecs I take care of. In order to minimize the rebuilds, all are going through in a single update. The codecs I plan to bump are the following:  - AOM  - libavif  - dav1d  - rav1e

Re: Self Introduction: Kate Hsuan

On 6/21/22 07:42, Kate Hsuan wrote: Hi Folks, My name is Kate Hsuan. I'm a software engineer from Red Hat. Currently, I'm working on integration with fwupd, gnome-shell, and gnome settings. They can be used to show the firmware security details and warnings to the user to reduce the risk of the

Media codecs big SONAME bump

Hello everyone, I am planning a soname bump of various media codecs I take care of. In order to minimize the rebuilds, all are going through in a single update. The codecs I plan to bump are the following: - AOM - libavif - dav1d - rav1e - svt-av1 - jpegxl Many of you will be affected

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in March

On 2/3/22 17:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 02. 02. 22 17:36, Michael J Gruber wrote: Still the same fallout from that rage quit ... Do we have @nim on record saying they are no longer interested in maintaining their Fedora packages? If so, I'd like to get them orphaned, so we know where are the

Re: Why was node_exporter.service renamed to prometheus-node-exporter.service?

On 1/28/22 14:18, Barry Scott wrote: On 28 Jan 2022, at 12:28, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:01:43PM +, Barry Scott wrote: I just had to fix a number of my servers that use node exporter. The service name has been changed. Why was this done and did no one think about t

Selinux slow / How to disable selinux labeling from SPEC Was: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On 1/24/22 01:30, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hi, So I have an annoying bug that started near the beginnings of F35. My papirus-icon-theme became very slow to install: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029709#c18 During the installation, all the files are copied, then renamed by rpm

Re: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On 1/24/22 01:30, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hi, So I have an annoying bug that started near the beginnings of F35. My papirus-icon-theme became very slow to install: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029709#c18 During the installation, all the files are copied, then renamed by rpm

Re: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On 1/24/22 05:14, Chris Murphy wrote: On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 5:30 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hi, So I have an annoying bug that started near the beginnings of F35. My papirus-icon-theme became very slow to install: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029709#c18 During the

Re: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On 1/24/22 01:52, Tom Hughes wrote: Do you have the nosync plugin enabled in your mock? That will shim system calls that try and sync to disk and suppress the actual sync in the name of greater performance. Tom I don't think so, my config is config_opts['chroothome'] = '/builddir' config_op

mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

Hi, So I have an annoying bug that started near the beginnings of F35. My papirus-icon-theme became very slow to install: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029709#c18 During the installation, all the files are copied, then renamed by rpm (no idea why it works like this). It works f

Re: Failure on the koji f36-rebuild target: /usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file /builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note...: No such file or directory

On 1/22/22 15:50, Marcin Dulak wrote: > /usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file /builddir/build/BUILD/.package_note-ga-5.7.2-8.fc36.x86_64.ld: No such This is a widespread known issue. Aledgedly fixed but I don't think it is. Refer to this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204

Re: Build failure in Clementine due to GCC 12

On 1/21/22 22:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 17:42, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 16:37, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On 1/21/22 14:46, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hello, So I built Clementine last week with no issue, but it failed during the mass

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 10/25/21 21:09, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Package_information_on_ELF_objects == Summary == All binaries (executables and shared libraries) are annotated with an ELF note that identifies the rpm for which this file was built. This allows binaries to be identified

Re: Build failure in Clementine due to GCC 12

On 1/21/22 14:46, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hello, So I built Clementine last week with no issue, but it failed during the mass rebuild with the folloing error: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/Clementine-0be314337d5bbd6fc7f5c76c31d7b87e37ba3a04/src/core/tagreaderclient.h:29

Build failure in Clementine: I need help

Hello, So I built Clementine last week with no issue, but it failed during the mass rebuild with the folloing error: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/Clementine-0be314337d5bbd6fc7f5c76c31d7b87e37ba3a04/src/core/tagreaderclient.h:29, from /builddir/build/BUILD/Cleme

Re: Unannounced soname bump of libre2

On 1/9/22 03:29, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 11:56:04PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/01/08 20:05: On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: The re2 package was updated today in Rawhide and bumped soname from libre2.so.0a to libre2.so.9. https://src.fed

Re: debug_package when using go_generate_buildrequires

On 12/6/21 12:42, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: Hi all, I was updating some golang specs I've and switching them to use go_generate_buildrequires. I realized that some specs that are using it fail to build if `%global debug_package %{nil}` is not set. Same spec with all BuildRequires defined works ju

Re: F35 Change: Switch to WirePlumber as the PipeWire session manage (late Self-Contained Change proposal)

On 7/19/21 18:17, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WirePlumber == Summary == PipeWire currently uses a simple example session manager. This proposal is to move to the more powerful WirePlumber session manager. == Owner == * Name: [[User:Wtaymans| Wim Taymans]] * Email: w

Re: Package downgrades from F34 -> F35 (categorized list included)

On 9/20/21 14:43, Fabio Valentini wrote: - golang-github-docker-libkv-devel-0:0.2.1-5.fc34 > golang-github-docker-libkv-devel-0:0.2.1-2.fc35 Might be a bug in rpmautospec, it has reset the Release to 1 when it did a build with the bootstrap flag. __

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35

On 9/7/21 6:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --rel

JPEG XL license change

Hi, JPEG XL license changed from ASL 2.0 to BSD with version 0.5.0. It will be reflected in the next release. Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr

Re: After branching F36, under Rawhide I can not build packages for F35 for i386 arch, instead of it mock builded packages for F36.

On 8/14/21 7:48 PM, Mikhail Gavrilov wrote: After branching F36, under Rawhide I can not build packages for F35 for i386 arch, instead of it mock builded packages for F36. Mock rebuild output: https://pastebin.com/LmQxFBUN From your log it seems the mock config file "fedora-35-i386.cfg" is s

Re: Weird error output when using "git push"

On 8/12/21 2:36 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: Now that vigra went stable in f35 I'm trying to build hugin.The git merge from rawhide worked fine as usual but when I tried 'git push' I get this: $ git merge rawhide Updating 88d7c81..69827ac Fast-forward  hugin-openexr3.patch | 17 -

Re: rpmautospec deployment into production

On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote: Hi everybody, we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on. This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid processes on the builders, which will restart any tasks which are bein

A FTBFS on s390x I'd like some advices for

Hi, Following the mass rebuild, the package utox stopped building on s390x. The following test is failing, with a message regarding a memory leak: + /usr/bin/ctest --output-on-failure --force-new-ctest-process -j3 Test project /builddir/build/BUILD/uTox-0.18.1/redhat-linux-build Start 1: te

Re: rpmautospec deployment into production

On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote: Hi everybody, we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on. This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid processes on the builders, which will restart any tasks which are bein

Re: rpmautospec deployment into production

On 6/16/21 6:03 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote: Hi everybody, we've scheduled the rpmautospec plugin to be deployed into production for tomorrow, from 14:00 UTC on. This means installing the relevant packages and restarting kojid processes on the builders, which will restart any tasks which are bein

libavif soname bump

Hello everyone, I'm planning a soname bump from 11 to 12 in libavif for version 0.9.2. The affected packages are: darktable-3.4.1-3.fc35.x86_64 libavif.so.11()(64bit) gd-2.3.2-5.fc35.x86_64 libavif.so.11()(64bit) kf5-kimageformats-5.83.0-1.fc35.x86_64 libavif.so.11()(64b

Re: [ELN] Rebuild ordering and side-tag support

On 6/30/21 2:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: In the scenario I'm discussing, we would take those final PackageA and PackageB from Fedora and have them in the buildroot for the ELN builds. That would mean that the bootstrap step wouldn't be needed. If there's a case you know of that this won't wo

Re: F35 Change: Golang 1.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 6/28/21 6:57 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.17 == Summary == Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.17 in Fedora 35, including the rebuild of all dependent packages(the pre-release version of Go will be used for the rebuild if released version wil

Re: [ELN] Rebuild ordering and side-tag support

On 6/28/21 5:55 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback to help identify potential issues with this proposed approach. How do you

"The fedora 34 iso/installer still hasn't been updated/is broken since November 2020 to install to MD raid arrays"

Hello, Some popular tech youtuber is encountering problems to install Fedora on MD raid arrays: https://twitter.com/tekwendell/status/1408255117506326529 The related bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897350 Is there any thing that can be done to alleviate this issue faster?

Re: Azure CLI + SDK, side tags, and metapackages

On 6/18/21 8:19 PM, Major Hayden wrote: On 6/18/21 1:14 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: I've started some but more help to review them all would be appreciated. I am in your debt, Robert-André. Thanks so much! > > It should be all done now. Best regards, R

Re: Azure CLI + SDK, side tags, and metapackages

On 6/15/21 10:15 PM, Major Hayden wrote: On 6/14/21 7:40 AM, Major Hayden wrote:    3) How should I go about getting these smaller packages reviewed?   The majority of them are almost identical. All of the Azure SDK components are up for review[0]. It's a lot to review (about 83 packages)

Re: RFP: Just

On 6/17/21 12:50 AM, Casey Rodarmor wrote: Hi there, I maintain a command runner, written in Rust: https://github.com/casey/just It's very much like make, except a lot nicer, and doesn't have a build system, so it's just for saving and running commands. It's reasonably popular, and I wanted to

Re: Introduction: Trevor McKay

On 6/16/21 5:11 AM, Trevor McKay wrote: Hello everyone, My name is Trevor and I was hoping to contribute to the Fedora project in the form of packaging. I was told the first step would be to introduce myself here. I have a few years of Linux experience as well as Rust, Python and C/C++ developme

Re: go-rpm-integration and symlinks

On 6/14/21 7:22 PM, Link Dupont wrote: I'm attempting to package github.com/rjeczalik/notify[1] as an RPM. This package includes a utility function[2] that determines whether a path is a symlink, and resolves it to an absolute path. This function clearly has merit, as the package is an abstrac

Re: aom soname bump

On 5/18/21 8:25 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hi, AOM AV1 version 3 has been published a while ago and I am planning to update it in Fedora. Due to a CVE affecting versions prior to 2021-04-07 (CVE-2021-30473), I plan to push this update to ALL STABLE RELEASES: https://bugzilla.redhat.com

Can a package ship with JS code preminified?

Hi, I remember the guidelines changed recently regarding js code in packages. Should the code be minified in the spec? Even if the minifier is not packaged in Fedora (webpack)? Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedora

Re: Seeking advice with rust packing guidelines

On 6/11/21 6:27 AM, Fabio M. Di Nitto wrote: Hey everyone, I have been reading the current guideline here: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Rust/ and for the most it´s pretty clear when packaging a standalone crate / rust generated binaries (given this is my very firs

Where is system-config-users?

Hello, System-config-users https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/system-config-users has been retired due to FTBFS and lack of mainteance. I would like to revive it but I can't find the source code anywhere. It was previously hosted on fedorahosted but has not been moved to Pagure. Anyone knows

Re: Review Request: icemon - A GUI monitor for Icecream

On 5/29/21 1:15 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: Hi, Review Request: icemon - A GUI monitor for Icecream https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965529 Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/icemon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jkratoch/icemon-3.3-6.fc34.src.rpm It should be very s

Re: Package review #1961174

On 5/18/21 3:19 PM, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. I have a new package in review (rhbz#1961174) that will obsolete 'mld2p4' Please, take a look if you can; i'll review one in exchange. Thanks. I have started the review. In exchange could you review jpegxl: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh

aom soname bump

Hi, AOM AV1 version 3 has been published a while ago and I am planning to update it in Fedora. Due to a CVE affecting versions prior to 2021-04-07 (CVE-2021-30473), I plan to push this update to ALL STABLE RELEASES: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1961376 I intend to wait until 3

Re: Self Introduction: Rémi Lauzier

auzier/rudo>> As the name implied, it's a clone of Sudo written in rust. I have been approve to be the packager of Rudo and some of it's dependency. Thanks Robert-André Mauchin(eclipseo). If you want to try it, you can use this copr <https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/

Re: Let's retire original glib and gtk+

On 5/7/21 4:45 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: Hi, I'd like to retire the original glib, GLib 1 from the GNOME 1 era. This is would take out the gtk+ package (GTK 1) along with it. (I'm not proposing to remove GTK 2.) GLib 1 has been obsolete for 19 years now, since GLib 2 was released in March 20

Questions regarding the new account system

Hello, On the old account system, when I sponsored someone into the "packager" group, they were automatically added to the "fedorabugs" group. This is not the case anymore, is it a bug or a feature? Globally I don't really like the new system. On a big group like: https://accounts.fedoraproje

Re: Next for ARC - researching how to replace PDC

On 4/19/21 11:13 AM, Adam Saleh wrote: Hi everyone, ARC team - that is me, Vipul and Mark, are looking to figure out possible ways how we could replace our current PDC [0] whose project has gone unmaintained for years [1]. We plan to share what we find out in our https://fedora-arc.readthedocs.

Re: SIMD-related package amd minimum supported instructions

On 4/16/21 7:10 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 6:29 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hello, I have a dependency that is a C++ library for SIMD (called highway). This library requires SSE4 as its minimum required instruction set ("Supported targets: SSE4, AVX2, AVX-512,

SIMD-related package amd minimum supported instructions

Hello, I have a dependency that is a C++ library for SIMD (called highway). This library requires SSE4 as its minimum required instruction set ("Supported targets: SSE4, AVX2, AVX-512, NEON (ARMv7 and v8), WASM SIMD."). However the minimum for Fedora is SSE2. Am I still allowed to package thi

Re: How to handle pull request with git?

On 4/15/21 1:24 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 04:04:21PM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On 4/14/21 3:28 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: I got a "pull request" for one of my packages and wanted to make some changes to discuss with the submitter and see if we could mer

Re: How to handle pull request with git?

On 4/14/21 3:28 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: Hi, I got a "pull request" for one of my packages and wanted to make some changes to discuss with the submitter and see if we could merge it back with those changes to the rawhide branch. But somehow I did something wrong and I am not sure what or how to

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 4/1/21 12:33 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:18 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek mailto:zbys...@in.waw.pl>> wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote: > >* Strict checking for unpackaged content

Display a message on the console while upgrading a package

Hello, Following a change in the config file of a program, I'd like to display a message to my users to indicate they need to update the config file with the new one. I try "echo" in the update scriptlet: %postun if [ "$1" -ge "1" ] ; then # Upgrade dnscrypt-proxy -service install --config

Re: Libavif SONAME bump

On 3/29/21 11:35 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 11:11 PM Robert-André Mauchin <mailto:zebo...@gmail.com>> wrote: On 3/29/21 10:56 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Can you do it now instead of waiting until next week? Next week starts > the F34 Fin

Re: Libavif SONAME bump

On 3/29/21 10:56 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 10:48 PM Robert-André Mauchin <mailto:zebo...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, Following the yanking due to an unannounced SONAME bump by my comaintainer, I intend to bump libavif soname next week to 10. The

Libavif SONAME bump

Hi, Following the yanking due to an unannounced SONAME bump by my comaintainer, I intend to bump libavif soname next week to 10. The affected packages are the following: PACKAGEDEPENDENT DEPENDENCIES libavif-0.8.4-5.fc35.x86_64

Review swaps

Hello! I have a dozen or more packages waiting to be reviewed and I'm looking for someone to help in exchange of some of yours. Silver is cross-shell customizable powerline-like prompt heavily inspired by Agnoster. It needs to be updated to 2.0.0. - [ ] rust-silver update - [ ] rust-co

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 3/8/21 11:52 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_r

How to backup and then replace a config(noreplace) config file?

Hello, Upstream has added breaking changes to their config file so I need to introduce this new config file as a breaking change in Rawhide. What is the best option to do so while backuping the previous config file? Best regards, Robert-André ___ d

Re: Help for FTBFS packages: apcupsd and firefox-pkcs11-loader

On 1/30/21 7:37 PM, Germano Massullo wrote: I tried fixing apcupsd and firefox-pkcs11-loader that started to fail after introduction of "CMake to do out-of-source builds", but I got some errors about missing files, that is strange since package structure has not changed, it's the same that buil

Re: can't build the package

On 1/11/21 8:25 PM, Alexander Vasilenko wrote: Fedora rawhide, last updates. Package: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnscrypt-proxy-gui Pushed new version to master, f33, f32. $ kinit f1...@fedoraproject.org -- sussecc, but $ fedpkg build Kerberos authentication fails: unable to obtain a s

Re: How to handle a config(noreplace) file that needs to be updated

On 1/4/21 2:44 AM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Robert-André Mauchin wrote: I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly changed, notably renamed sections. As such some older config parameters won't work anymore. Tools like sed, ed, awk etc. in %post scrip

How to handle a config(noreplace) file that needs to be updated

Hello, I have a project for which the config file (toml) has been significantly changed, notably renamed sections. As such some older config parameters won't work anymore. However the current config file can't be overwritten because of config(noreplace) directive. How do I recommend my users t

Re: HEADS UP: libgit 1.1.0 update with SONAME bump (in Rawhide)

On 12/29/20 4:12 PM, Igor Raits wrote: All packages were rebuilt successfully except julia. It is FTBFS due to the GCC 11.0 upgrade (so it is FTBFS for quite some time already). The update is on the way to Rawhide and I don't plan to push this update to stable releases (unless somebody asks fo

Re: Review Request: rubygem-asciidoctor-diagram - Asciidoctor diagramming extension

On 12/22/20 12:23 PM, Christopher Brown wrote: Hello, Would it be possible to get a review on this please? You can't provide precompiled jar files, they needs to be build from source: Issues: === - Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build Note: Jar files in source (see at

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable spec file preprocessing (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 12/18/20 3:52 PM, James Szinger wrote: No. One can also download the sources from upstream using spectool or similar, even wget or curl. My local work flow is typically get or create spec file and patches, spectool -g, rpmbuild -bs, mock. Unrelated to the topic at hand, but why do people

Re: GCC 11 related build failure

On 12/15/20 1:12 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: Just for reference, we *do* have a relatively up to date build of googletest for things to use in our gtest[1] package that is supposed to work with gcc11 already... [1]: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gtest It was bundled, I ended up disabling buil

GCC 11 related build failure

Hello, While building Googletest, I've encourtered this failure: /builddir/build/BUILD/aom-2.0.1/third_party/googletest/src/googletest/include/gtest/gtest-printers.h: In instantiation of 'void testing_internal::DefaultPrintNonContainerTo(const T&, std::ostream*) [with T = {anonymous}::Y4mTe

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

On 12/14/20 4:29 PM, Christopher wrote: Even if people don't agree that "main" is better for other reasons, surely people can agree that "rawhide" is much better than "master" for our dist-git branch names for our RPMs, simply because it follows our naming conventions and makes things easier fr

Re: dav1d SONAME bump

On 12/5/20 12:21 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hello, I plan on updating dav1d to 0.8.0 next week. This triggers a soname bump (libdav1d.so.5). Affected packages are: libdav1d-0.7.1-2.fc33.x86_64 libavif-0.8.2-1.fc34.x86_64   libdav1d.so.4()(64bit

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

On 12/3/20 4:02 PM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GitRepos-master-to-main == Summary == This Change will move Fedora git repositories to use "main" as the default git branch instead of "master". Specific repositories will be manually moved and default git branch for n

  1   2   3   4   >