Owen,
Thanks for explaining the situation with umask. I'd noticed the
discrepancy between login/non-login shells and wondered what was
going on.
>It seems like we need to do one of two things:
>
> - Go back to the old behavior, maybe by using the usergroups option to
>pam_umask and removing the
Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>FYI, UCRT can be installed on various Windows:
>https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/update-for-universal-c-runtime-in-windows-c0514201-7fe6-95a3-b0a5-287930f3560c
Sure, it *can* be. But that doesn't mean I can rely on my end users
to be able to do that. Currently
Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 05:17:29PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>>
>> But yes, for Windows releases ≥ 95 OSR 2 and < 10 (and no, Windows version
>> numbers are not anywhere near monotonic ;-) ), MSVCRT is included out of the
>> box, UCRT is not. Is it really a good
Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>* Ron Yorston [13/02/2019 08:45] :
>> If so, why would they do that? Why would they *not* want their package
>> to be available as a regular package? It seems counterproductive for
>> them to downgrade their package to this second-class status.
>
Neal Gompa wrote:
>Ron Yorston wrote:
>> What is a "module-only" package?
>
>These are packages that move from the main Fedora distribution into
>the addon "fedora-modular" repo that is enabled by default on Fedora
>systems.
What causes a package
Fabio Valentini wrote:
>In the past few weeks, it has come up regularly that future
>"module-only" packages are orphaned (and hence will soon be retired),
>and nobody stepped up to fix this issue - especially for non-leaf
>packages. I don't think fedora as a project has a solution for this
>yet.
Adam Williamson wrote:
>On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 08:58 -0700, stan wrote:
>> On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 09:33:39 +0200
>> Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>
>> > There is no root acoount on a default F29 installation. Also, you
>> > can't see the boot menu and I haven't been able to trigger it.
>>
>> Whoa! I'm not
Rich,
Thanks for packaging zerofree. It's been great to be able to install
my own software without having to build it.
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>zerofree is a package that can take an ext2 (only?) filesystem, work
>out what parts of the filesystem are not used, and either zero them or
Hans de Goede wrote:
I plan to use 1 subpackage per extension of the frippery
extension collection, so that people can install only those
which they want without automatically getting all of
them.
I'd prefer them to be in one package: they are intended to work
together.
I understand that
