Hi, all.
I realize I should have done this a long time ago, but perhaps better
now than never. I haven't been around in the Fedora community in a while
and it looks like life will keep me busy for the foreseeable future. As
a result, I'm looking for maintainers for the following packages in
On 09/27/2014 05:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote:
* gstreamer-plugins-espeak
* pybox2d
* python-elements
* python-oauth
* sugar-logos
* sugar-physics
* sugar-tamtam
All gone. That was fast. Thanks!
Sebastian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
Hi all,
I'm orphaning the following packages, which are all dependencies for
Typepad Motion and don't appear to be used by anything else. If you're
interested, feel free to pick them up.
* typepad-motion
* django-flash
* django-typepad
* python-batchhttp
* python-remoteobjects
*
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway
tcall...@redhat.com wrote:
[sdz] sugar-tamtam: sugar-tamtam-common-0-0.4.20100201git.fc14.x86_64
This seems to be a false-positive. The activity subpackages all depend
on the common package, which itself contains the license file.
--Sebastian
Hi all,
since I'll be entering college soon, I'm revisiting my workload (I'll
continue to work on Sugar and Etherpad). I'm using neither of the
following applications (nodm was originally intended to be used for
sugar-related work) and since both avogadro and nodm have a few open
bugs which I've
Hi all,
I've been the maintainer of the Fedora Design Suite [1] for the past
release cycle [2], which has also been part of the F13 talking points
[3]. However, I'll be starting college at the end of the summer and
I'm suspecting that I might have a little less time then. Hence, I'm
looking at
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:59:32PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:36:47PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Anyone else interested in working on packaging this?
Can it be build and used without the rawzor binary blobs?
No. That's Needs Work.
Wait,
