Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-14 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > I have uploaded preliminary versions of the unit files I put together > for the various services of our default install. I think they give an > indication how simple these files actually are: > > http://0pointer.de/public/syste

Re: [HEADS-UP] systemd for F14 - the next steps

2010-07-15 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 08:54:13PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Generally I think it is a good idea to ignore errors like this if they > are clearly caught by later commands, simply for robustness > reasons. i.e. if the command really fails to label the dir properly, > then the daemon won't

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:18:06PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 15.07.10 08:58, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > I have uploaded preliminary versions of th

Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post

2010-07-15 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:04:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 15.07.10 11:02, Chris Adams (cmad...@hiwaay.net) wrote: > > > > > Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said: > > > We have a bug open with CUPS trying to generate SSL certs on the first > > > connections, being too slow and ca

I am not available

2010-07-18 Thread Till Maas
Hi, I cannot maintain my packages or handle anything else until further notice, because I had an accident. Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: I am not available

2010-07-20 Thread Till Maas
Hi, I want to thank everyone for their get well wishes. I am already a lot better than I was when I wrote the initial mail and have full internet access again. The mail might have been a little premature, but this is what happens if one has access to an internet phone too soon after an accident. I

Re: Seeking to merge python 2.7 into rawhide

2010-07-27 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 10:35:50PM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote: > Sadly, my name (for django-lint) is on the list. I've seen a rebuild of > django-lint produced an error. Of course, fixed it, but the fix was not > taken in account for the above list. > What can I do to correct this situation, es

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-04 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:00:16PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > | xiphmont's Info | xiphmont's Packages (328) > | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/xiphmont > > How is that package count to be interpreted? It is the amount of all packages that match any of the selected fi

Re: Integrity protection of fetches

2010-08-04 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:42:01AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I suspect it might short-circuit the 'ahhh, but what about...' 'oooh, > but then I can...' nature of the conversation if you just put together a > proof-of-concept attack and document it somewhere. I suspect the git > maintainers m

Re: Fedora 14 Alpha Can Still Ship on Time IF these bugs get attention TODAY

2010-08-05 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 02:55:05PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > workflow, or merely an RFE I need to file against Bodhi? The RFE is already there: https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/343 Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman

Re: Integrity protection of fetches

2010-08-05 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:11:24PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 22:03:14 +0200 > Till Maas wrote: > > The attack is quite trivial: > > 1) clone the git pkg Fedora repos > > 2) commit some nasty change > > 3) publish the repo on some server >

Re: Integrity protection of fetches

2010-08-06 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote: > > Yes ssh is secure if used properly. To get the proper known_hosts entry, > > one has to download https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ssh_known_hosts btw. > > > > We

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

2010-08-06 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:34:30AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Petr Pisar wrote: > > PulseAudio is interresting project, but it's absolutely unusable on old > > slow hardware. Last time I checked it out on Pentium TSC (no MMX) > > running at 200 MHz, > > Fedora doesn't support that hardware anymo

Re: Integrity protection of fetches

2010-08-06 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 04:31:00AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 04:32:36PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Till Maas wrote: > > > > > > Yes ssh is secure if used proper

Re: Changelog for the latest Fedora kernel release/updates

2010-08-07 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 10:56:49AM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel > > So fedpkg is only available in updates-testing. Any direct link? fedpkg is included in the package fedora-packager and it is already in the updates repo. Regards Till pgpeEjB7cvTPk.pgp Desc

Re: Changelog for the latest Fedora kernel release/updates

2010-08-07 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 12:47:00PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: > I do need to be in a ACL and have a public key, isn't? :) You do not need the ACL to clone and you certainly need a FAS account to clone via ssh. But I do not know, whether you need to be in the packager group to be able to clone. > O

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

2010-08-08 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 09:39:44PM +0200, Robert Scheck wrote: > Hi, > > as per non-responsive maintainer policy at > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I have filed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992 Imho the bug report s

Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?

2020-05-14 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:37:08PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 04:26:36PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 3:13 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > > > > > > > 1. Why do you want to be a member of FESCo? > > > > 2. How do

Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?

2020-05-14 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:50:59AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > And perhaps it doesn't really provide more information, but it could. > > But I suppose without enough data people might not vote for people with > too short / curt answers. Oh well, if people feel the explicit questions > are better

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-29 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 06:48:56PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Nothing in vi's default view (if launched with a file, which is what > happens in this case) tells you you need to press 'insert' in order to > actually edit anything. Nothing in vi's default view tells you you have > to type

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-29 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:16:29AM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > While it may be worth vim making themselves better, it really doesn't > change the argument. > > Even a friendlier vim is still going to be far to strange and > confusing to somebody just looking to quickly change a setting and g

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

2020-06-29 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 05:21:58PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Package (co)maintainers Latest build > > gpscorrelate tillFedora 30 fixed. Thanks Till __

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-07-03 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 09:01:21AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 05:52:07PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 08:16:29AM -0400, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > > > > > While it may be worth vim making themselves b

Using "rawhide" for the dist-git branch for Fedora Rawhide

2020-07-07 Thread Till Maas
Hi, in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2410 I proposed to name the dist-git branch for Fedora Rawhide "rawhide" to clarify the purpose of that branch. There was also some feedback that Rawhide might not be the best name and it could be renamed. In that case, the branch could be named as this. This i

Re: Using "rawhide" for the dist-git branch for Fedora Rawhide

2020-07-08 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 10:13:36PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > I (strongly) support the renaming of the branch, but I really > really would prefer there to be a rough consensus on the > replacement name across the entire git community, so > that I don't need to remember to git-checkout devel i

Re: Using "rawhide" for the dist-git branch for Fedora Rawhide

2020-07-08 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Jul 07, 2020 at 09:03:19PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2410 I proposed to name the dist-git > branch for Fedora Rawhide "rawhide" to clarify the purpose of that > branch. There was also some feedback that Rawhide might not

Re: Autoclosure of review requests?

2020-02-25 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:04:26PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > The usual Bugzilla housekeeping (branching, EOL closure, etc) explicitly > excludes review request bugs. Having a large number of open, ancient review > requests isn't exactly harmful, but it's not very helpful either. > > Before I mak

Re: GSoC 2020 | Improving Network Linux System Role

2020-03-25 Thread Till Maas
/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/summer-cod...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Till Maas He/His/Him Associate Manager, Software Engineering NetworkManager, Nmstate, Ansible RHEL Networking System Role Red Hat GmbH, http://www.de.r

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-03-30 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:04:03AM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote: > For transparency, we have published the full User Story list which is > linked within the blog and for ease of searching is here: > https://hackmd.io/@My419-DISUGgo4gcmO1D6A/HJB74lcL8 the user stories list does not seem to incl

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-03-30 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:59:07PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:18 PM Till Maas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:04:03AM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > > For transparency, we have published the ful

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-03-30 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:40:13PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:26 PM Till Maas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 01:59:07PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 2:18 PM Till Maas wrote: > &g

Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)

2020-03-30 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:28:59AM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote: > No singular Forge satisfied every single User Story. Any feature gaps will > land on the Backlog of Gitlab for voting and prioritisation as their > Engineering teams see fit. this sounds very disturbing. Please clarify this. Fe

Re: The Git forge decision (was CPE Weekly: 2020-03-28)

2020-03-31 Thread Till Maas
Hi Leigh, On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 09:56:10AM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:13 PM Till Maas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 11:28:59AM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote: > > > > > No singular Forge satisfied every singl

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

2020-04-06 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 12:59:40PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 29. 03. 20 13:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > According to the Fedora's Fails To Build From Source policy: > > Oprhaning is a easily revertible nondesctructiove action. > > Only packages orphaned for 6+ weeks will be retired (removed f

Re: CPE Git Forge Decision

2020-04-06 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:34:07AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > Why is it disappointing? The Pagure project isn't suddenly being > removed from the internet. Is there a reason you can't contribute to > it to add the features you need? From my experience, I know that many of my contributions are t

Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04

2020-04-06 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:35:28AM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Miro Hrončok" > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 8:28:15 AM > > Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04 > > > > On 06. 04. 20 14:19, Alex Scheel wrote: > > > That

Re: Question about mass rebuilds

2019-11-25 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 10:33:54AM -0500, Steven A. Falco wrote: > Yet according to koji, there is no build for fc31: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=avr-libc > > I'm not saying that anything is wrong - I'm just curious as to why the > package wasn't rebuilt. Any gu

Re: Git Forge Requirements: Please see the Community Blog

2020-02-06 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:34:37PM +, Leigh Griffin wrote: > On behalf of the CPE team I want to draw the communities attention to a > recent blog post which you may be impacted by: > https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requirements/ > > We will be seeking input and requirement

Re: Turning off keys.fedoraproject.org

2020-02-13 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:15:01PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > are sent over TLS, but what do they do if your email provider doesn't > support SMTP over TLS? Do they refuse your key in that case? My guess > is that they send the verification email unprotected, and that that's > one reason why th

Re: Has fedpkg + dist-git replaced rpmbuild for building new/local packages?

2019-10-07 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:39:22PM +0200, David Kaufmann wrote: > Although I have to re-symlink SOURCES everytime I work on a different > package I can use all of rpmbuild, mock, fedpkg,… from the same source > folder. You can also use a wrapper script that can be called in dist-git working copie

Re: What is the real value of Release and %changelog metadata?

2020-08-14 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 03:08:50PM +0200, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Release tag problem/proposal > > > Let's stop requiring Release bumps for each build. And let's put an > additional tag into Release, like proposed in [4]: > > "Release: 1%{?dist}%{?buildtag}" > >

Re: Should the default editor be changed from vi to nano on upgrades to Fedora 33+

2020-12-04 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:30:45PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Changing the default on upgrades is good because the Fedora 33+ experience > is similar regardless whether the system is freshly installed or upgraded. in this specific case, the argument for making nano default was that it is e

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-04 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:52:13PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > After looking at the infra and releng issue trackers Kevin managed to found > back > the ticket I was thinking about. > You have my apologies, the namespace that was asking to a different default > branch and for that branch to

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-11 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:13:19AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > I don't think you can make branches completely descripive by themselves, > unless possibly you make them really long. > > flatpak_branch_where_stable_flatpaks_are_made_from That it is about flatpaks is already described in the

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Stop Shipping Individual Nodejs Library Packages (Self-Contained)

2020-12-11 Thread Till Maas
Hi, this does not seem to be self-contained, since it seems to affect people outside the SIG (it states that this is also affecting packages that are not owned by the SIG). On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 01:44:30PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NodejsLibrariesBundleBy

Re: Fedora 34 Change: GitRepos-master-to-main (Self-Contained Change)

2020-12-14 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 12:41:44PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:03:17PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 11:13:19AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > > I don't think you can make bra

Re: How to easily automate test builds in a COPR project

2020-12-31 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 07:58:53AM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > 4. Build the packages in COPR. > > Easy enough using a bash script but is there a better way? packit allows to create test builds in COPR based on GitHub PRs and probably also releases. Maybe this can make it easier for you, to

Re: [ELN] Rebuild ordering and side-tag support

2021-06-28 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 11:55:21AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Summary: I think we can fix the ELN side-tag rebuild problems and make > the composes more reliable if we change the mechanism for kicking off > rebuilds. I'm soliciting feedback to help identify potential issues > with this

Request for contributions: Demos of Features or other videos for virtual FOSDEM 2021 booth

2021-01-20 Thread Till Maas
Hi, there will be a virtual booth at FOSDEM 2021 and this allows to show some videos. This allows to present the latest features in Fedora or other interesting items. I skimmed over the Features for 33 and 34 and the following topics seemed to be good for a video: - IoT edition - i3 spin - overvi

Re: Request for contributions: Demos of Features or other videos for virtual FOSDEM 2021 booth

2021-01-22 Thread Till Maas
Hi Michel, On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 09:55:04PM -0800, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > [snip] > > If you would create a video to show at FOSDEM or have one in mind, > > please add them to the table at > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FOSDEM_2021#Videos > > > > FOSDEM will be 6-7 February, so if

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

2016-03-21 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:25:43AM +, David Woodhouse wrote: > It might be nice to provide some RPM macros to make that easier for > packagers.  It is a simple one-liner if you use gpgv2: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/youtube-dl.git/tree/youtube-dl.spec#n35 Thank you for raising aw

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

2016-03-22 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:02:40PM +, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 18:02 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > > > It is a simple one-liner if you use gpgv2: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/youtube-dl.git/tree/youtube-dl.spec#n35 > > That'

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

2016-03-22 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 09:12:15AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > As an aside, I think Till has code written to make the lookaside use > sha256. I'm not sure what the next steps are to get that rolled out > though. Just for the record: Mathieu wrote the code/did the work for this. -- devel mailing l

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

2016-03-22 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 06:01:28PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > Our packaging guidelines really ought to mandate that *if* upstream > > publishes GPG or PKCS#7/CMS signatures of source tarballs, then the > > package *must* verify those signatures as part of %prep. > > I

Re: Checking signatures on package source tarballs

2016-03-23 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:45:59PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > I suppose so, at least if the key is specified as only a filename. What > will it do if a URL to the key is provided, and the key at that location > has been modified? Will it replace the key with the modified one in the > scratch bu

Re: Error while retiring breathe

2016-04-09 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 09:09:11PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > I'm renaming breathe [1] to python-breathe [2]. I just tried to retire > breathe in f22 using the instructions on the wiki [3] and got the following > error: Even when the other errors will be fixed, you will only be able to retire t

Re: Error while retiring breathe

2016-04-10 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 04:11:29PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > It has been renamed to python-breathe and should be retied from all > branches. Based on that I assumed I was doig the right thing based on the > statement: "Run fedpkg retire DESCRIPTION in all branches that need to be > retired sta

Re: Error while retiring breathe

2016-04-25 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 08:32:42PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > Sorry, I didn't notice it mentioned in the wikis that I read about renaming > that they shouldn't be retired from stable branches. It would probably be > helpful if that sort of information there. Or even better, if fedpkg > prevente

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-17 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:58:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 05/12/2016 07:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Nothing says that in the future, we couldn't handle other kinds. > > Fundamentally, libsolv can process rpm-md/yum, susetags/yast2, hdlist2 > > (mdk), and helix repos. And those are j

Re: how to unretire package

2016-05-22 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 01:07:33PM -, Martin Gansser wrote: > I already piushed the buttom + Ask Retirement, but this fails with the message > "You must provide a valid review URL to un-retire master" > > i gave as review_url this link to > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338140

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-05-31)

2016-05-31 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:07:23PM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Ter, 2016-05-31 at 21:56 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > >> smb4k (maintained by: sergiomb, rdieter) > >> kde-plasma-smb4k-1.2.1-3.fc24.i686 requires > >> plasma4(scriptengine-declarativeappletscript) =

Re: Package retired by was taken (by me)

2016-06-01 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:04:18PM +0100, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > It seems that s3ql package was retired today however I took the > package on 2016-05-16 and update it week later, see BZ #1249301 If you would like to maintain s3ql and the package it depends on, you can ask me or releng to get

Re: Intending to un-retire milkytracker and rtmidi for F24 and rawhide

2016-06-01 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 10:21:34PM +0300, Joonas Sarajärvi wrote: > I wish to become the point-of-contact for rtmidi and unretire both rtmidi > and milkytracker. This should have happened now. Currently it is best to file a ticket on the releng trac if these kind of unretirements are needed. Kin

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-05-31)

2016-06-01 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 02:30:27PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > No, I'm implying if we rebuild smb4k in rawhide package will still > depend on strigi ... (by dep chain ?!? ) .  > So I think we should retire strigi, fix broken deps of (I guess [1] ) > kdelibs4-devel and after that we can rebuild smb

Re: Hadoop?

2016-06-02 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:25:19AM +, Christopher wrote: > Ugh. Wish I had noticed. Is there a quick way to get it unretired? It's > still an essential dependency of some packages which are not retired, or > even orphaned. I tried to assign nc6 and hadoop to you but pkgdb seems to be not prop

Re: Retired solr, parquet, parquet-format

2016-06-06 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > chm ... should I read it as I should retire rubygem-rsolr as well? > Nothing depends on it in Fedora I guess. A new mainainer for hadoop was found, however something in pkgdb is broken that prevents unretiring it. Therefore retiring th

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-09-08)

2016-09-13 Thread Till Maas
Hi there, On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:07:06AM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > The following packages require above mentioned packages: > Depending on: freeradius-client (11), status change: 2016-04-29 (18 weeks ago) > asterisk (maintained by: jsmith, gtjoseph, itamarjp, lbazan, > leifm

Orphaned oflb-riordonfancy-fonts

2016-09-23 Thread Till Maas
Hi, I just orphaned oflb-riordonfancy-fonts - it is a FTBFS package I tried to save from retirement a while ago thinking that maintaining a font should not be that hard. However I realized I do not have the time to get to understand why it does not build. Therefore I orphaned it for now and will r

Re: [POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2016-10-14 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 10:00:09AM +, nob...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > Change in package status over the last 168 hours > > libmongo-client [f23, master, epel7, f24] was orphaned by kevin > Alternative C driver for MongoDB > https://a

Re: [POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2016-10-15 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 09:34:50AM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote: > libmongo-client is orphaned upstream (once upon a time it was created, > because the official driver was not properly maintained, but it's not > the case any more). For syslog-ng we changed to the official > mongo-c-driver with syslog

Re: Notifications on dependency retirement

2016-10-20 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 03:59:41PM +, Christopher wrote: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016, 08:51 Julien Enselme wrote: > > Thanks for the link. I didn't use to pay much attention to these > > emails. I'll be more careful in the future. > > > > There's a lot of noise on this list, and those emails are i

Re: Notifications on dependency retirement

2016-10-20 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 01:34:18PM +0200, Julien Enselme wrote: > I discovered this morning that a package I co-maintain was retired > (ccnet [1]) because one of its dependency was retired (libzdb [2]). I > learned it only because we have an open bug on it that change assigner > because of this fa

Re: Notifications on dependency retirement

2016-10-21 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:51:25AM +0200, Julien Enselme wrote: > I guess that in this case you mean the (co)maintainer of the retired > package not its dependencies. Can I ask what permissions on the package > are required to get these mails? > > What I find strange here is that I am a (co)maint

Re: noarch debuginfo packages missing from repo?

2016-10-25 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 05:44:49PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: > rawhide-debuginfo is enabled, and indeed i.e. qt5-qtbase-debuginfo is > found). I suspect that perhaps noarch debuginfo packages are missing from AFAIK debuginfo packages are not generated for noarch packages. I am not sure if there i

Re: DNF and PackageKit background data usage

2016-10-30 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:02:43AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 09:15 +0100, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote: > > I > > just found that the packagekit cache on my machine is about 7Gb !!! > > This has got to be a bug, please report it. There are several bug reports about the

Re: [HEADS UP] broken/fixed gnupg2-2.1.13 and pygpgme renamed to python-pygpgme

2016-11-20 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Mon, Jul 25, 2016 at 07:02:44PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Alogn with this I realized that pygpgme spec needs some love (like > cleaning stuff, adding %check section to run tests, backporting > patches) and renaming, so I sent new one for review[5] and created > repo with our (Fedora) f

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-11-14)

2016-11-20 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:34:39AM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > Depending on: gnome-web-photo (1), status change: 2016-09-15 (8 weeks ago) > shutter (maintained by: liangsuilong, ivanromanov) > shutter-0.93.1-3.fc25.noarch requires gnome-web-photo = > 0.10.5-9.fc24 gn

Re: upcoming build and release developer flag day December 12 2016

2016-11-20 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 11:21:03AM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > What do you mean by above, exactly? Right now koji certs are signed by > „Fedora CA”, will those be replaced by certificates signed by universally > trusted CA? Yes. Regards Till ___ de

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 1 week)

2018-12-27 Thread Till Maas
Hi, Am 19.12.18 um 15:20 schrieb Miro Hrončok: This should all be gone after I mass retire on Monday. If the package is already retired but not known to be, retiring it again will make sure it is retired correctly. it would be great to verify this. In the past I spotted some packages like t

Re: Organizing a "packager experience" objective and working group

2019-01-15 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 07:47:26PM -, Artur Iwicki wrote: > - Now that I've mentioned it, maybe we should add something like "fedpkg > fas-login"? Personally I've put "alias koji-init='kinit > my-fas-acco...@my-domain.org'" in my .bashrc, because looking up how to solve > the "koji says I'm

Re: Can we please stop enforcing Signed-off-by commits?

2019-01-18 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 08:14:32AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 4:13 AM John Harris wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 18, 2019 4:07:19 AM EST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > TIL - there's a git feature for adding S-o-B to a commit. > > > I always typed it out by hand .

Re: F30 Self-Contained Change proposal: MongoDB Removal

2019-01-29 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 04:23:48PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > My understanding is that not only we will not able to test those, but there > will be no point of shipping them at all. What am I missing? It is very likely that the packages can still be used to access MongoDB instances that run on

Re: Orphaned packages that will be retired (and everything will most likely burn)

2019-02-20 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:28:17PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 15. 02. 19 v 14:22 Emmanuel Seyman napsal(a): > > * Hans de Goede [15/02/2019 12:09] : > >> And automatic scripts really just should hand it over to the first > >> co-maintainer > >> in the list. > > > As long as we have no id

Re: libravatar is in fedorainfracloud!

2019-02-21 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 09:40:16AM +0100, Michal Novotny wrote: > We, as a libravatar group, are very happy that Fedora Infra provided > us with the needed > hardware. We will keep the service running by our own effort. What is the right place report errors in the web server configuration regardi

Stepping back from FESCo

2019-02-28 Thread Till Maas
Hi friends, Brian[0] made me think about my commitments and I realized that it is time to step back from my FESCo seat. Thank you for your confidence in electing me last year! Kind regards Till [0] https://www.winglemeyer.org/ramblings/2019/01/07/cookie-cleanup.html

Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?

2019-04-11 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 11:04:11AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Basically, there would now be a button on the sidebar which would show the > current monitoring status and would allow project admins and pagure wide > admins > to update this setting. > > Feedback most welcome :) Awesome! Ca

Are MP3 files now permitted in Fedora packages?

2016-12-11 Thread Till Maas
Hi, Since Fedora now ships a MP3 decoder, does the Code vs Content section in the Packaging Guidelines[0] now need a update to allow MP3 file or are MP3 files still not permitted? Kind regards Till [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Code_Vs_Content __

Re: Start packaging/maintaining in Fedora

2016-12-14 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:00:35PM +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote: > To be honest I looked at wikis and so, but I'm still rather confused, I > don't know really where or how to start. Why do I want to start packaging? > Well, I want to keep contributing to Fedora but more into development. As I > kn

Re: Start packaging/maintaining in Fedora

2016-12-17 Thread Till Maas
Hi, On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 03:45:20PM +0100, Ms Sanchez wrote: > I want to start packaging and maintaining packages in Fedora, but I'm a bit > lost. What should I do first? How can I start maintaining a package? Is > there anyone who can guide me a bit, please? > > I know Python and C language

Re: pkgdb: Could not save the request for branch: master, has it already been requested?

2016-12-21 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:02:03PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > This is the kind of thing that should probably be in an infrastructure > ticket instead of the mailing list, but I happened to see your message. > As far as I can tell, you're correct in your assessment and I'd > certainly cal

Re: pkgdb: Could not save the request for branch: master, has it already been requested?

2016-12-21 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:34:16PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > Side-note: the new package request allows either full url or just BZ ticket > number. Perhaps the unretirement form could be made to also accept both > inputs. Yes, a fix is already queued for the next release of the admin tool that p

Re: SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED

2016-12-24 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > With the move to kerberos, fedora-cert becomes un-needed. Is there a way to get the FAS username from kerberos using another python module? fedora-easy-karma uses fedora-cert to get the current FAS username. Kind regards Till

Re: `best=1` in new Mock

2017-01-01 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 01:49:37PM +0100, Miroslav Suchy wrote: > dependency. This option was not added to rawhide chroots as there are > broken dependencied very often. AFAIK in Rawhide only one version is available for each package, therefore I suspect this does not have a real impact on Rawhid

Re: SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED

2017-01-08 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 12:33:19AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2016-12-24 at 09:28 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > > > > With the move to kerberos, fedora-cert becomes un-needed. > > >

libinfinity soname bump

2017-01-12 Thread Till Maas
Hi, libinfinity will be updated to 0.7.0 soon which includes a soname bump. AFAICS nothing else depends on it. Kind regards Till ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: packaging problem - rm: cannot remove ... Permission denied

2017-01-22 Thread Till Maas
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 12:47:15PM +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: > At a glance: the usual convention is 'make DESTDIR=... install', not 'make > install DEST=---' Actually there is %make_install which is recommended by the Packaging Guidelines IIRC. Kind regards Till __

Re: New

2017-01-22 Thread Till Maas
Hi Sarthak, it is great that you want to participate, I hope you find something you enjoy at the Fedora project. On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 11:47:39AM +0530, Sarthak Gupta wrote: > I am good at C programming, HTML and know the basics of MySQL. I am hoping > to learn more through the open source. Ba

Re: Why Delta RPM is not available for firefox and there is no firefox-esr in the Fedora repository?

2017-04-07 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 11:44:16AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:40:25AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > There is a bit of a problem with that, though, and packages that > > iterate quickly. 52.0-6 went stable on 2017-03-24. 52.0-7 went stable > > on 2017-03-30. 52.0.

Re: Orphaning publica-icaro

2017-04-07 Thread Till Maas
Hi William, On Thu, Apr 06, 2017 at 03:43:00PM -0600, William Moreno wrote: > The icaro project have moved theirs documentation from publican o sphinx I > am orphaning the icaro-theme. this sounds like it would be a good idea to just retire it directly. Kind regards Till ___

Re: F27 System Wide Change: Rsyslog log format change proposal

2017-05-30 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 07:21:07PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Does this qualify to be a system-wide change? To me this looks like a > self-contained change, since I don't see any other packages or processes in > need for adjustment, but rsyslog itself. > > Please correct me, if I'm m

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >