On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 9:09 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 3, 2024 at 2:56 AM Tomáš Popela wrote:
> >
> > Hi Stephen
> >
> > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:15 PM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >>
> >> * AGREED: All packages currently include
Hi Stephen
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:15 PM Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> * AGREED: All packages currently included in ELN Extras will have
> an EPEL 10 branch created for them (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:28:51)
>
Please exclude Thunderbird and Firefox from the EPEL 10 as they are
packaged in
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 1:28 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Hi Leigh,
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:03 AM Leigh Scott
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > As I'm on my laptop again, I was able to try to run the rebase again and
> > for Philip it was about rpmfusion-nonfree-updates, but I'm hitting:
> >
> >
Hi Leigh,
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:03 AM Leigh Scott
wrote:
> Those warnings should disappear once the 39 release rpm's are installed.
> I have fixed the missing repodata for the unused updates repo's.
>
As I'm on my laptop again, I was able to try to run the rebase again and
for Philip it
Hi Leigh,
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 7:26 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> > just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
> >
> >
>
> What do you mean?
> I branched rpmfusion two week ago, the repo deps look fine to me.
>
See the reply from Philip Rhoades - I've hit the same on Silverblue when
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> > I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.
>
> The problem was libunistring-1.1-3.fc38 (again).
>
> We untagged it in december, but looks like no
On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 4:30 PM Kalev Lember wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:55 AM Kalev Lember
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hopefully most people are back from vacations now so I think we can go on
>> with organizing the first Flatpak SIG meeting.
>>
>> I have created a whenisgood poll for
On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:46 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:58:51PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Dear maintainers.
> >
> > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following
> packages
> > should be retired from
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 6:45 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 08:53 +0100, Tomáš Popela wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:30 AM Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Th
Hi Adam,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:30 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 03:28 +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 12:42 AM Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi folks! Today I woke up and found
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2151495 ,
Hi Neal,
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 5:15 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> Yes, the EOL period is further out, but I'd rather make it so that the
> next RHEL will have ImageMagick 7 right from the beginning.
>
Just to be transparent: ImageMagick (or GraphicsMagick) won't be in RHEL 10
(or in any future
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 2:34 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 04:04:59PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > In the wild, I often see Fedora described as a "semi-rolling" release.
> As a
> > policy matter, the distribution promises to be mostly
Hi Sérgio,
Dne so 27. 8. 2022 21:53 uživatel Sérgio Basto napsal:
> As Kevin Kofler (more or less) wrote in "Pcre Deprecation" thread,
> maybe we should be prepared to support pcre-1 forever and IMO we also
> can extend the concept to other packages, btw GTK2 is one of them .
>
>
> Checking on
Hi Kevin,
Dne so 27. 8. 2022 1:44 uživatel Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> napsal:
> Tomáš Popela wrote:
> > This is an early heads-up about GTK 2 removal from RHEL 10+ (the gtk2
> > package was marked as unwanted in ELN with
> >
> https://g
with
regards to modern technologies such as Wayland, HiDPI screens, HDR and
others.
In RHEL 10 the GTK 3 and GTK 4 will still continue to be available for
everyone to use.
Regards,
Tom Popela
--
Tomáš Popela
Desktop and Desktop Applications Subsystems Product Owner
Display Systems
Red Hat
Hi Pierre,
Is the subject right? It talks about "michaelanguskelly", but the queries
are for Benjamin (benzea). I can talk to Benjamin if needed (already
pointed him at this thread just in case).
Tom
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 9:59 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon
wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> The
Hi Artur,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 7:58 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <
s...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> I wanted to try building a Fedora Flatpak, so I headed over to the docs
> and started with the tutorial.
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/flatpak/tutorial/
>
> The first step instructed me to
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 4:47 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 10:38 AM Michal Schorm wrote:
> >
> > How many more years can I expect it will take to resolve or at least
> > seriously examine this following BZ?
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414539
> >
> >
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:47 AM Mark O'Brien wrote:
> All,
> We are very happy to announce that we now have AArch64 support for flatpak
> and container fedpkg builds in production!
>
> By default all flatpak and container builds will be built on both
> architectures from now on.
>
> Thanks,
>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 1:51 PM Alexander Bokovoy
wrote:
> Screencasting still does not work in Fedora 33. It pretends to work as
> in claiming through the applications and GNOME indicators that the
> screen / application window / browser tabs are shared but nothing gets
> actually shared.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 3:24 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 8:15 PM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
> >
> > Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-33-20200830.n.0.iso does not have nano
> > on the install media itself. Is it intentional?
> >
>
> It's supposed to be there, but I don't know how
On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 4:34 AM Chris Murphy
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 7:52 PM Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>
> > The IPP Everywhere specification requires clients to support DNS-SD
> > (mDNS is part of that) or WS-Discovery. Printers are required to
> > support both DNS-SD and WS-Discovery.
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 11:24 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
> Sorry about the empty email, I've hit send too fast…
>
> Anyway, on the topic of parallel builds: what is everyone's opinion on
> adding the %limit_build macro from openSUSE (see:
>
>
On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 9:56 AM Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I am opposed to this change. Chromium and Firefox build fine with GCC. I
> think that a distribution should be built with a consistent toolchain
> wherever possible.
>
Kevin, that's not true at all. Maybe it looks like it builds fine for you,
I'm sorry as I didn't see this downstream patch -
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Gtk3-WebKit/blob/master/f/Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-Port-to-webkitgtk4.patch
.
Then it's fine and sorry for the noise.
Tom
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:14 AM Tomáš Popela wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:33
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 6:33 PM Richard W.M. Jones
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 04:24:22PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > rjones: perl-Digest-SHA3, perl-Gtk3-WebKit
>
No open bugs in perl-Gtk3-WebKit? Please read
26 matches
Mail list logo
