Did you forget to merge the pr?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cantata/pull-request/4#request_diff
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
It was removed from the kernel not xorg.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-Drop-Old-UMS-DRM-Infra
Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-09-05 at 22:41 +0000, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the
> >
Neal Gompa wrote:
> > My understanding is the reason we hadn't was because of the NVIDIA
> binary driver.
It doesn't matter if it breaks 340xx, it's in a poor state due to legacy drm
removal.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
You have some other issue as all those rpmfusion dep issues are bogus.
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On 2.09.2024 12:20, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> > and try to run:
> > dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --ass
Terry Phelps wrote:
> I tried several times. Should I worry? Maybe it'll be there soon?
You should use the user forums for your user issues.
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/latest
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To uns
Run
sudo dnf install sqlite-devel --refresh
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-cond
cjs should be treated the same as gjs, it's the same code with renamed files,
the licences haven't been changed.
https://github.com/linuxmint/cjs
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
Why is there a difference between gjs and cjs conversion?
gjs
-License:MIT and (MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+)
+# modules/esm/_encoding/util.js and few other
things are MIT
+# modules/scrip
Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hi Oliver,
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2024 at 10:35 AM Olivier Fourdan ofour...@redhat.com wrote:
> > But there is also more flexibility in having those separate from what
> > ships with the driver, for example, there are currently several issues
> > affecting egl-wayland 1.1.14 and t
Did you forget to remove the buildrequires
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server-Xwayland/blob/rawhide/f/xorg-x11-server-Xwayland.spec#_37
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 6:59 PM Leigh Scott leigh123li...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I have decided to orphan these packages as they are useless replacements
> > for the nvidia driver provided libs.
> > The rpmfusion 560+ driver will use the bundled libs.
&g
I have decided to orphan these packages as they are useless replacements for
the nvidia driver provided libs.
The rpmfusion 560+ driver will use the bundled libs.
I believe it's time fedora dropped eglstream support.
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/-/merge_requests/1386
Affected pac
For more info
sudo dnf history info 87
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is such a
> burden... but it does seem to be. ;(
>
> kevin
It isn't just once.
1. kerberos
2. Web login on infra, bugzilla, bodhi, devel list and accounts
If you do nightly shutdown you would need to enter it many times per week.
--
> On 23. 06. 24 20:33, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Leaving the group won't disable 2FA.
>
> I recommend opening a fedora-infrastructure ticket and asking for help.
I can't login as I don't have the otp needed to login
--
_
> I have deleted the google authentication app form my phone intentionally, no
> backup.
> Please remove the OTP form my fedora account!
I refuse to use 2FA for my account!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
> I'm so pissed of with this change I will probably leave the project if it's
> not
> reversed.
I have deleted the google authentication app form my phone intentionally, no
backup.
Please remove the OTP form my fedora account!
--
___
devel mailing l
I'm so pissed of with this change I will probably leave the project if it's not
reversed.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs
Once set you can't disable it.
If this persists I will ditch provenpackager group
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedorapr
I normally use gnome-online-accounts to unlock Kerberos when I login, now I
need to use CLI.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://d
How do I disable this?, it has made kerberos login much harder.
I'm considering ditching provenpackager rights if that is a condition.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproje
> Another option is to package the nvidia-kmod-open module into Fedora and
> sign it with Fedora key.
>
> Starting with version 555, nvidia-kmod-open will be the default option.
Fedora doesn't allow any out-of-tree modules, so that idea is a non-starter.
--
> Once /etc/pki/akmods/certs/public_key.der is generated, it is used to sign
> any akmod-*
> package installed or updated.
>
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kmodtool/c/1900f33c17ff4bc1011be4279ff...
The user (with admin rights) is free to install akmod-rootkit and kmodtool will
sign it
Once /etc/pki/akmods/certs/public_key.der is generated, it is used to sign any
akmod-* package installed or updated.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kmodtool/c/1900f33c17ff4bc1011be4279ff13a7eb6a046b1?branch=rawhide
--
___
devel mailing list -- dev
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NvidiaInstallationWithSecureboot
> * Other Developers: No work required from other Fedora developers. The
> only requirement outside of the scope of the proposal owners is to
> reintroduce AppStream metadata into the Nvidia driver repo on
> RPMFusion
I consider this as spam that serves no purpose!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-co
ffmpeg
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ffmpeg/c/db2acb3681a85baed6bbc897cdac792d4b7d7c5f?branch=rawhide
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Con
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:23 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Does this mean "I'm against it" or "it would involve retiring two
> legacy NVidia driver packages"?
>
> Fabio
I'm indifferent to the legacy drivers.
--
___
> This message is meant as a heads up because I am considering upgrading
> Xwayland to version 24.1.0 in Fedora 40.
+1 for this in f40.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 4:31 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> Not directly related, but hopefully not entirely off-topic:
> Are there plans to update the xorg-x11-server package itself to the
> new stable branch too?
>
> It's been stuck on the 1.20.14 release for a long time (on the last
> releas
+1 for adding this to f40, nvidia-470xx goes EOL September 2024.
> This message is meant as a heads up because I am considering upgrading
> Xwayland to version 24.1.0 in Fedora 40.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm revisting the topic of rpmautospec because I was doing some work
> on various packages, and it's annoying that some packages are using
> rpmautospec and others are not.
>
> All my packages have been converted, so in day-to-day work, I don't
> even think about %changelog. Wh
What is missing?
> Other then some missing RPMFusion packages
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/pro
> Thanks for holding the push to testing, I have managed to patch nvidia 545.xx
> and
> 550.xx so
470.xx is also patched.
I think it is ok to push the new kernel to testing, the legacy nvidia drivers
shouldn't hold up the new kernel.
--
___
devel maili
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:45 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> This is not accurate. The 6.7.3 (and 6.6.15) updates did break the
> nvidia driver. It has nothing to do with debugging being enabled. A
> proper and valid bugfix:
>
> 5ec8e8ea8b7783fab150cf86404fc38cb4db8800 mm/s
> I can support that.
>
> But am I supposed to ignore the fact that kkofler is already bullying the KDE
> SIG into not
> breaking that one other package they maintain that occasionally breaks on kde
> updates? See
> example: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-977de87584
>
> Am
Kernel-6.7.3 still has debugging enabled which will break the nvidia driver
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6859
https://forums.developer.nvidia.com/t/linux-6-7-beta-550-40-07-error-modpost-gpl-incompatible-module-nvidia-ko-uses-gpl-only-symbol-rcu-read-lock/280908
--
_
Have you looked at other distros to see how they worked around the flaws in the
upstream code?
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/packaging/packages/materialx/-/blob/main/PKGBUILD?ref_type=heads#L32
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorap
> P.S.: opening three threads for a single thing with identical text is
> not nice. It can confuse archive readers, not finding answers they
> might be looking for. Try to avoid that in the future, please.
Chromium did the duplicates :-(
--
___
devel m
I have unpushed the f38 build.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-68a2dba357
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://
see https://github.com/GNOME/gtk/commit/77ebdd85091833a7869ece48c3114fa6d9966321
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedorapro
Why isn't gtk3 a critical path package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260068
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260073
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260074
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5d8ac182bf
--
__
Why isn't gtk3 a critical path package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260068
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260073
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260074
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5d8ac182bf
--
__
Why isn't gtk3 a critical path package?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260068
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260073
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260074
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-5d8ac182bf
--
__
> Try adding 'BuildRequires: gcc-c++' to the specfile
>
> checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gcc... gcc
> checking whether the C compiler works... no
> configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/hello-2.10':
> configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
> See `config.log' for more detail
Try adding 'BuildRequires: gcc-c++' to the specfile
checking for x86_64-redhat-linux-gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... no
configure: error: in `/builddir/build/BUILD/hello-2.10':
configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables
See `config.log' for more details
--
_
I'm -1 for this change, it shouldn't be enabled by default as it will cause
issues for users using router mac filtering.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
sassc
rubygem-hrx
rubygem-linked-list
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
Li
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM David King wrote:
> - Out of the 13 packages that seem correlated but don't show obvious errors
> directly related to libxml2, there are still some quite suspicious ones,
> like cinnamon which fails due to a missing xml file.
> [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud
Try adding this to the file
#include
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
Li
I have this simple review pending if you interested.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2213540
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Use whatever you like as I wont be migrating to the new infra!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/projec
> Am 08.09.23 um 22:32 schrieb Michel Lind:
>
> Are you sure it's working?
>
> [root ~]# dnf --enablerepo=updates-archive list firefox*
> Letzte Prüfung auf abgelaufene Metadaten: vor 0:04:10 am Sa 09 Sep 2023
> 09:39:57 CEST.
> Installierte Pakete
> firefox.x86_64 117.0-1.fc37
> Hi Leigh,
>
> On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 10:03 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
>
> As I'm on my laptop again, I was able to try to run the rebase again and
> for Philip it was about rpmfusion-nonfree-updates, but I'm hitting:
>
> error: Updating rpm-md repo 'r
Those warnings should disappear once the 39 release rpm's are installed.
I have fixed the missing repodata for the unused updates repo's.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproje
> just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
>
>
What is the issue?
I branched rpmfusion repo two weeks ago
$ sudo repoclosure --check rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfree
Last metadata expiration check: 1:27:59 ago on Thu 24 Aug 2023 17:14:49 BST.
package: mesa-va-drivers-freewo
> just a note rpmfusion free and nofree not ready
>
>
What do you mean?
I branched rpmfusion two week ago, the repo deps look fine to me.
$ sudo repoclosure --check rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfreetanita999fly
Last metadata expiration check: 1:07:49 ago on Thu 24 Aug 2023 17:14:49
> On Mon, Aug 14 2023 at 07:19:05 PM +0200, Jan Drögehoff
>
> Unfortunately yes. There is more info here:
>
> https://www.hadess.net/2023/08/new-responsibilities.html
>
> Red Hat has instructed us to stop work on several core desktop
> components. All of these components need new maintainers
You probably got removed for inactivity, see
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UG3UOKBVJLUWZYEHWL52KPMITPEPEBNF/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to dev
I have orphaned tint2.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tint2
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/proj
So this change is for workstation iso only?, the other spins wont have this
unwanted change.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs
> sudo dnf -y in lightdm-autologin-greeter
>
>
> [+0.00s] DEBUG: Logging to /var/log/lightdm/lightdm.log
> [+0.00s] DEBUG: Starting Light Display Manager 1.32.0, UID=0 PID=5256
> [+0.00s] DEBUG: Loading configuration dirs from
> /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d
> [+0.00s] DEBUG: Loading configu
> Fedora 38 Cinnamon Desktop - LIGHTDM.SERVICE FAIL.. after last
> update
> don't know how to fix it
>
> please fix / test / update ...
It works fine here.
I haven't updated lightdm since f38 release so I doubt the issue is caused by
lightdm.
__
You could bootstrap dnf for the rebuild
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dnf/blob/rawhide/f/dnf.spec#_298
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
I have solved it with this
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mint-themes/c/85835bb3515a68babd4795cd34585ab6aaf8ff11?branch=rawhide
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.or
It builds fine for f39 and f38 local builds, it fails for f38 koji and copr
builders.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101949820
Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
/usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Aqua/index.theme
/usr/share/themes/Mint-X-Blue/index.theme
/usr/shar
> Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto:
>
> I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like the
> following:
>
> Error:
> Problem: conflicting requests
> - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by
> libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-1015
Maybe
%global numjobs 1
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: ht
Maybe ask https://github.com/mesonbuild/mocklibc
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-co
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 12:16 AM Samuel Sieb
>
> So we have pushed a change in Fedora where there is no nice way for a user
> to workaround it except by complaining to a company that probably doesn't
> care what normal users (e.g. non-paying customers) care about?
You can set LEGACY if you wa
libheif has been retired at rpmfusion due to koji issues.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6626
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Con
I have orphaned hstr today.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hstr
It is currently non-functional due to kernel-6.2 changes, see
https://github.com/dvorka/hstr/issues/478
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
> xine-lib and libheif are both fedora packages.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YMOLJESUIIFK5RZYPGWTE362CKZH7JXV/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week Saturday the 25th.
>
> Some of you will be affected by these changes.
> RPMFusion side, the following packages are affected:
>
> libheif
> xine-lib
>
xine-lib and libheif are both fedora packages.
_
I have orphaned libheif at rpmfusion as I have no desire to manage another
split package.
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/libheif/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
I can give sponsorship and acl's for the rpmfusion package.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/c
> Hey all,
>
> ffmpeg is getting upgraded to 6.0 for Fedora Linux 38 and Rawhide in
> order to remain compatible with prominent third-party repositories.
>
Thank you for keeping up.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
google-chrome rpm caused issues due to it's SHA1 signature.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/c
I wont be using the API again due to the 30 day limit.
If they change the password requirement again I will dump redhat bugzilla!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
F
> Posted the rpmfusion bug here:
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6573
Try learning to wait patiently, branching isn't a simple process.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@
-1 for this change.
I will ignore it if it's accepted.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-o
> On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 15:12 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> X Display Manager with support for XDMCP, host chooser
>
> what are the alternatives of "Display Manager" ? and "with support for
> XDMCP" ? only gdm ?
>
> And xdm is not abandoned https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/xdm ,
> mayb
> I have the same issue with mpv:
>
> /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libopenmpt.so.0: undefined reference to
> `mpg123_open_handle_64'
> /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libopenmpt.so.0: undefined reference to
> `mpg123_replace_reader_handle_64'
> /usr/bin/ld: /lib/libsndfile.so.1: undefined reference to `mpg123_seek_64'
>
> Lack of legal action is not evidence of no further legal action. There are
> multiple
> possible explanations:
>
> - they see no point because going after distros would waste time and money
> and bring bad
> PR
> - going after Redhat who would assume liability is a different story as
> they’r
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Considering that we have been shipping these hardware codec interfaces for
> years without any legal trouble, I find this absolutely ridiculous.
>
> Kevin Kofler
Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean it can't.
I found this link very informative on the
> On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 08:24 +0200, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> That seems to contradict this quote from
> https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/linux-graphics-x-org-drivers/opengl...:
>
> it, also keeping the repo in sync with fedora isn't a priority for me.
Someone with the hardware and packaging k
> On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 22:42 +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote:
>
> I found this: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6410#c1
>
> Again, not a very friendly response. The short is that they are
> currently in freeze so no action can be taken ATM.
The rpmfusion f36 release repo isn't fixa
I have started to ignore CVE bugs reports due to the low quality reporting.
An outdated ffmpeg CVE was filed against nv-codec-headers, WTF!!
It isn't the first time it's been totally bogus.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
> Also note that you will also need to create a kmod package for
> the also out of tree v4l2-loopback kernel driver. The closed-source
> userspace bits Intel provide only work with gstreamer. So the
> way this is used on other distros is with a little helper process
> which runs a gstreamer-pipeli
Separate drivers for the kernel aren't permitted in fedora, try submitting a
review request at rpmfusion.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct
> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:56:58PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
>
> There are 26 patches so that's a bit of a PITA. Is there not an
> easier way?
>
> Rich.
Try using autopatch.
# Apply patches up to #1000 from this spec.
%autopatch -M1000 -p1
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cg
I have patched to add the unversioned .so
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libid3tag/c/607d7abf709add3e39690adfd3aef871c50d37c2?branch=rawhide
I don't think there is a need to rebuild dependant packages.
[leigh@mpd libid3tag]$ abipkgdiff libid3tag-0.15.1b-37.fc37.x86_64.rpm
libid3tag-0.16.2-
Switching upstream has increased the .so version from libid3tag.so.0 to
libid3tag.so.0.16.2
I plan to do the rebuilds myself after checking everything builds ok in copr.
Affected packages
Fedora:
audacity-0:3.1.3-5.fc37.x86_64
easytag-0:2.4.3-16.fc37.x86_64
gtkpod-0:2.1.5-21.fc37.x86_64
imlib2
> I'm guessing I need to provide a separate common package containing the
> non-binary
> files - i.e. udev configs, license, readme, and so on. So the akmod, or the
> kmod package
> implicitly expects a corresponding common package to be made available?
> Anything need to
> be done specifically
> Here is a link to the code:
>
> https://github.com/cowboysmall-apps/hid-ite8291r3-kmod
>
> any help would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> J.K.
Drop the sub-package as it isn't correct to have it the kmod package.
https://github.com/cowboysmall-apps/hid-ite8291r3-kmod/blob/main
> Thanks for the reply - I'll try this later.
>
> Can you point me at the documentation for the process please? I can find docs
> and
> tutorials on building standard RPMs - the hello tutorial for example - but I
> can't
> find any documentation anywhere for building RPMs for kernel module, or f
I'm inclined to vote -1, if everyone keeps DT_HASH around I doubt Epic will
fix the issue.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.
> Hi,
>
> I’m just testing the new 20220813 branch end encounter several issues.
>
> One of them is image factory, which I need to install to test building a
> server image.
>
> # dnf install imagefactory
> Last metadata expiration check: 1:35:08 ago on Sat 13 Aug 2022 05:57:29 PM
> CEST.
>
IMO it would be worthwhile doing test builds to see how many of the dependent
packages actually still use external asio.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Co
Shouldn't asio package be retired as it's provided by boost-devel?
/usr/include/boost/asio/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.
1 - 100 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
