Re: Sources file audit - 2010-01-06

2010-01-13 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
Laurent Rineau wrote: > Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit : > >> rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe >> rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe >> > > Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths a rebuild in Rawhide, or is the cvs > commit su

Re: Can MMX be expected to be supported for F12+?

2010-01-18 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
inly can. Even Via Samuel is MMX enabled. Actually any processor built after the original Pentium (i.e. >= "Pentium MMX") is, AFAIK -- Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416 IT managerNoBug Consulting SRL A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Becaus

Re: Review swap

2010-01-25 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 01/25/2010 09:03 PM, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Hi, > > I have an easy package to review, telepathy-sunshine. It is a Gadu Gadu > connection manager for telepathy. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557546 > I'd happily swap reviews with something not too complex. > > Julian > >

Re: Potential F14 feature: Use GPT partition table by default for "wipe complete HD" installations

2010-03-19 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
Till Maas wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:34:59AM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:25:45PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:55:37PM +0100, Till Maas wrote: >>> Hi, how about using GPT[0] partitions for F14 for all i

Re: init script behaviour

2010-06-15 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 06/15/2010 03:08 PM, Joe Orton wrote: > Any opinions on this? I've had a query. > > What should "service start" do for a daemon - or more specifically, > when should it return? There is inconsistency amongst different current > init scripts, two general approaches: > > 1) fire and forget:

Re: CVS connection time-outs

2010-07-05 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 07/05/2010 05:54 PM, Patrick MONNERAT wrote: I'm currently trying to perform the initial CVS import of a package that has quite a bunch of patches with ./common/cvs-import.sh. All my attempts (for more than one hour!) were unsuccessful because at least one of the connection to cvs.fedorap

Re: CVS connection time-outs

2010-07-06 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 07/06/2010 01:20 PM, Patrick MONNERAT wrote: > On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 11:57 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > >> FWIW, I had no problem cvs-importing a 16Mb glibc srpm about an hour >> ago (from within the M-net network). >> > The problems I get (from Switzerland) seem to be connection-r

Re: package review checklist

2010-07-13 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 07/13/2010 12:27 PM, Jens Petersen wrote: >> Should someone write up a draft for an official package review >> checklist, and have FPC update it when guidelines change? (I guess by >> writing this email I just volunteered myself...) >> > How about scripting and packaging it? Then one could just

Re: Developers of packages please pay attention to selinux labeling.

2010-07-13 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 07/13/2010 05:11 PM, Christopher Brown wrote: > [...] > Whilst I appreciate your huge efforts to provide users with a more > secure system, you need to realise that SELinux as it stands at the > moment is utterly broken. As you clearly don't think this is the case, > please spend some time in us

Re: glibc heads up

2010-07-22 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 07/22/2010 11:30 AM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Well, as I firstly thought so, I tried scratch build with adding "uname -a" >> and >> it returned the below, for example. >> >> Linux x86-09.phx2.fedoraproject.org 2.6.32-44.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Jul 7 >> 15:47:50 EDT 2010 i686 i686 i386

Re: feature freeze?

2010-08-10 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 08/10/2010 05:42 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:03:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote: > > >> No, I think more like someone who could have given him 10, gave him 5, >> with a promise of another 5, if he paid 10. >> > > That someone is under no obligation whatsoever

Re: Javascript JIT in web browsers

2010-08-16 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 08/17/2010 02:35 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 15:48:14 -0700, > Adam Williamson wrote: > >> Meanwhile, back in the real world, it is effectively impossible to use >> all sorts of useful websites without Javascript enabled. Even for >> > > Then don't use them. I

Re: Javascript JIT in web browsers

2010-08-16 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 08/17/2010 03:15 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Manuel Wolfshant wrote: > >>Do you REALLY believe that in a world where 90% of the desktops are >> Windows, where 2 thirds of the browser market is shared by IE and safari >> >

Re: Javascript JIT in web browsers

2010-08-16 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 08/17/2010 03:22 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Manuel Wolfshant > wrote: > >>Do you REALLY believe that in a world where 90% of the desktops are >> Windows, where 2 thirds of the browser market is shared by IE and safari >> and

Re: Tsclient

2010-09-04 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
at end users doing a yum search can find these ones? I > haven't even heard of either of these before and tsclient has been > popular for a very long time. +1 here. -- Manuel Wolfshant linux registered user #131416 IT managerNoBug Consulting SRL A: Yes. >

Re: koji client does not work through proxy

2010-09-14 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 09/14/2010 12:18 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010, Ralph Lange wrote: > >>Hi, >> >> Today I had to learn that the koji client, while being the only way to >> request a build, does not support proxies. >> >> In a university like environment with no open ports whatsoever, with a

Re: koji client does not work through proxy

2010-09-17 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 09/17/2010 09:37 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 à 15:13 +0300, Manuel Wolfshant a écrit : >> On 09/14/2010 12:18 AM, Mike McGrath wrote: >>> You'll need at least some open ports. 443 and 80 I think are the only >>> ones required for k

Re: x86_64 as Fedora's primary platform

2010-09-28 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 09/28/2010 03:58 PM, mike cloaked wrote: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: > >> On 09/28/2010 12:06 PM, mike cloaked wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Andrew Haley wrote: >>> On 09/27/2010 10:03 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > I

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-11 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 10/11/2010 08:51 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 12:44:49 -0500, > Chris Adams wrote: > >>> I think that is a misfeature. I don't want anything irreversible to be done >>> until I say go. >>> >> You know that Fedora has done partitioning/mkfs about halfway throu

Re: Ubuntu 10.10's installer looks rather nice

2010-10-12 Thread Manuel Wolfshant
On 10/12/2010 10:35 PM, Manuel Escudero wrote: > > > 2010/10/12 James Antill > > > On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 16:00 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 11:11 -0400, Chris Lumens wrote: > > > > - suggests a username and hostname based on th