Re: F38 proposal: Noto CJK Variable Fonts (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-03-14 Thread yanqiyu01
在 2023-03-15星期三的 00:08 +0900,Akira TAGOH写道: > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 11:44 PM wrote: > > > > With some layering package trick, yes, all behavior returned to > > before. > > after the swap. > > Aha. Thank you for testing. Hmm, that is interesting... > > > Also, at least for Evince it can tell

Re: F38 proposal: Noto CJK Variable Fonts (Self-Contained Change proposal)

2023-03-14 Thread yanqiyu01
With some layering package trick, yes, all behavior returned to before. after the swap. Also, at least for Evince it can tell me what font it is using, and in this case it's google-noto-sans-cjk-fonts or VF version. 在 2023-03-14星期二的 23:14 +0900,Akira TAGOH写道: > > Thank you for the feedback. > >

Re: Mesa in F37- vaapi support disabled for h264/h265/vc1

2022-09-28 Thread yanqiyu01
I would be very SAD if this change lands on my computer. While instead of arguing with some legal puzzles, I think those parts can be provided by seperate package (and maybe packaged in rpmfusion?) like intel- media-driver.  Is there any build-to-build ABI match requirement between the VAAPI

Re: Grub 2 protected packages

2021-04-11 Thread yanqiyu01
在 2021-04-11星期日的 15:59 +0200,Vitaly Zaitsev via devel写道: > On 11.04.2021 03:19, Chris Murphy wrote: > > That condition is met by efifs, ergo by wrapping GRUB file system > > modules as EFI file system drivers. > > Is it possible to install such EFI filesystem drivers without > patching > UEFI

Did golang really get upgraded to 1.16.2?

2021-04-09 Thread yanqiyu01
Hi folks,  I see some reports in FZUG community that this commit [1], supposed to update golang to 1.16.2 in its changelog, didn't change its tarball or n-v-r to new version. And actually builds to 1.16-2. Is it intended to fo the upgrade or the commit is just a normal rebuild with wrong