On 10/19/2015 10:02 AM, Simon Pichugin wrote:
Hi team,
I am working now on the fixing lib389 broken tests:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48303
And it's time for dsadmin_* tests. Can anybody, please, tell me more
about it?
As I see, Mark and Thierry worked on it, but any other team
members are welcomed too. :)
I think all I did for it was to make it python 3 compliant. I think it
was a work-in-progress fora future CLI interface. Thierry can probably
answer this for sure, but it s definitely not being used at the moment.
I have a few questions:
1) What should we do with dsadmin_* tests and its coverage?
- for example, we have "TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not callable" after
- topology.conn.replica.changelog and
- topology.conn.backend.add
- or "AttributeError: DirSrv has no attribute 'getMTEntry'" after
- topology.conn.getMTEntry('o=MISSING')
And it is only a few revealed after first run.
2) Should we rename dsadmin_* tests somehow? (there is no dsadmin project
anymore)
3) Do we need bug_harness.py or is it obsolete?
Again, I think Thierry can answer these questions best.
Regards,
Mark
Please, provide me with details.
Thanks,
Simon
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
