Hi
We were discussing different setups of replication agreements (multi master)
between a large number of hosts and ways to minimize contention during updates
with interconnected hosts. For example the same change might arrive on a host
from two other hosts via different paths at the same time
...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:389-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Gerrard
Geldenhuis
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 5:25 PM
To: '389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org'
Subject: [389-devel] Thought excersize: A different take on replication
Hi
We were discussing different setups
-Original Message-
From: 389-devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-devel-
boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Soeren Malchow (MCon)
Sent: 03 December 2010 16:42
To: 389 Directory server developer discussion.
Subject: Re: [389-devel] Thought excersize
: Re: [389-devel] Thought excersize: A different take on
replication
Hi Gerrard,
Since you are already mentioning OSPF, how about grouping the
Masterservers into zones and have only one of the hosts taking care
of the communication to other zones.
Changes could always only be replicated
