Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-07-21 Thread Christopher Meng
I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the February? And now APLpy is broken. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-07-21 Thread Sergio Pascual
Hello 2014-07-21 10:59 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com: I just want to ask here, why did you retire the pywcs and considered it as dead upstream whereas pypi pywcs has a new release in the February? The functionallity of pywcs is now in astropy, is where active development is

I'll take tinyca2 (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3)

2014-07-02 Thread Peter Hanecak
Hello, I would like to take over tinyca2. I do not see anywhere on the list why the maintainers left it. So I'll check the procedures and also other sources and take it. According to Koji[1], some F21 build was successful last month so hopefully there wont be many difficulties. Sincerely

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-07-02 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:38:10AM +0200, Sergio Pascual wrote: I thought I had retired correctly pywcs, but is not in the list. Did I miss some step? The list contains only packages I am going to retire unless they are taken care of. So if you retired a package, it is expected that the package

Re: I'll take tinyca2 (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3)

2014-07-02 Thread Paul Wouters
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Peter Hanecak wrote: I would like to take over tinyca2. I do not see anywhere on the list why the maintainers left it. So I'll check the procedures and also other sources and take it. According to Koji[1], some F21 build was successful last month so hopefully there wont

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-07-01 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: alliance chitlesh, tnorth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945 I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also three years behind upstream, therefore I am not convinced it is

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-07-01 Thread Christopher Meng
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: alliance chitlesh, tnorth https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945 I applied your patch but then noticed that the version

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-07-01 Thread Till Maas
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:47:57AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: alliance chitlesh, tnorth

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-27 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote: The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. More patches: alliance chitlesh, tnorth

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-26 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: Package(co)maintainers === NearTree tmatsuu The following packages

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-26 Thread Christopher Meng
I'd like to claim the ownership of blktap and alliance. What should I do next? DIrectly request the ACL via bugzilla? Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-25 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote: cbmc orphan, shakthimaan I have taken this package. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Till Maas
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
On 2014-06-24 15:12, Till Maas wrote: The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. I have posted patches for a few of these (some before I realized they were orphaned), should anyone want

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:12:11PM +0200, Till Maas wrote: Depending on: jbosscache-support hibernate3 (maintained by: gil, jhernand, msrb) hibernate3-3.6.10-14.fc21.src requires jbosscache-common-parent = 1.6-8.fc21

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich
Package(co)maintainers === NearTree tmatsuu The following packages require above mentioned packages: Depending on: NearTree rasmol (maintained by:

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:31:18AM +0700, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote: Package(co)maintainers === NearTree tmatsuu The following packages require above

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21 v3

2014-06-24 Thread Till Maas
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: