On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:09:51 -0400, bugzilla wrote:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789636
abrt-bot@… changed:
What|Removed
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:09:51 -0400, bugzilla wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789636
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 759143 ***
This one is highly suspicious. It would be better to not close it
as duplicate so
On 03/30/2012 05:00 PM, Karel Klíč wrote:
Michael Schwendtmschwe...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:09:51 -0400, bugzilla wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=789636
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 759143 ***
This one is highly suspicious. It would
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de writes:
I am suspecting this also to be a false positive:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806419
which was closed as duplicate of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=707963)
Different OSes (F15, vs, F16), entirely different sets of
Karel Klíč wrote:
Please let us know if you see other suspicious actions.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805736
I reopened the false duplicates.
The backtrace here looks the same in all apps: __GI_raise triggered from the
Qt event loop, but that's because the Qt event loop
