Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > You mean like "python-s3transfer", which bundles multiple multiple > python modules together for no intelligible reason, requiring > hand-tuning of packages like "awscli" which have to seek out the > relocated modules? > > The guideline has sometimes been ignored for

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:51 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Florian Weimer wrote: > > This is closer to the existing policy, I think: > > > > > > Actually, the very first 2½ sentences at that link make my point even more

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

Florian Weimer wrote: > This is closer to the existing policy, I think: > > Actually, the very first 2½ sentences at that link make my point even more clearly than the link I had posted: | Fedora packages SHOULD make every

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

* Kevin Kofler via devel: > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> I see a "Source1" tarball from github. If a github published archive >> isn't reasonable for a Source tarball, there are a *lot* of other >> .spec files that would need to be rejected. > > As per: >

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > I see a "Source1" tarball from github. If a github published archive > isn't reasonable for a Source tarball, there are a *lot* of other > .spec files that would need to be rejected. As per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries#Treatment_of_Bundled_Libraries

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:36 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:49 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:22 AM Josh Stone wrote: > > > > > > On 1/16/21 3:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 4:54 PM Kevin Kofler via devel

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:49 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:22 AM Josh Stone wrote: > > > > On 1/16/21 3:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 4:54 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > > > wrote: > > >> > > >> Miro Hrončok wrote: > > >>> See also: > >

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:22 AM Josh Stone wrote: > > On 1/16/21 3:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 4:54 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > > wrote: > >> > >> Miro Hrončok wrote: > >>> See also: > >>>

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

On 1/16/21 3:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 4:54 PM Kevin Kofler via devel > wrote: >> >> Miro Hrončok wrote: >>> See also: >>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bootupd/c/c6cf7f6492e0d943e8471f86719df89eed587f6a?branch=master >> >> This is a blatant violation of

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 4:54 PM Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > See also: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bootupd/c/c6cf7f6492e0d943e8471f86719df89eed587f6a?branch=master > > This is a blatant violation of Fedora packaging guidelines and ought to be >

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

Miro Hrončok wrote: > See also: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-bootupd/c/c6cf7f6492e0d943e8471f86719df89eed587f6a?branch=master This is a blatant violation of Fedora packaging guidelines and ought to be reverted immediately. Kevin Kofler

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 2:28 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 15. 01. 21 20:34, Igor Raits wrote: > > Hello, > > > > My friendly co-maintainers pushed > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stratisd/c/32d87697075a846f9a3feb9ee66058287a91ccde?branch=master > >

Re: [ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

On 15. 01. 21 20:34, Igor Raits wrote: Hello, My friendly co-maintainers pushed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stratisd/c/32d87697075a846f9a3feb9ee66058287a91ccde?branch=master that

[ELN] How to handle RHEL-specific changes when it fails in ELN?

Hello, My friendly co-maintainers pushed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stratisd/c/32d87697075a846f9a3feb9ee66058287a91ccde?branch=master that claims that it makes spec compatible with RHEL (ignore parts that they violate packaging guidelines). However, it might make it RHEL compatible but