Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-25 Thread Haïkel
2015-09-24 18:58 GMT+02:00 Stephen John Smoogen : > On 24 September 2015 at 10:40, Haïkel wrote: >> Looks like we do have some progress on that topic :) >> >> So plan B would be: >> 1. automate EPEL rebuilds in CBS >> 2. have CI run automated test

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-24 Thread Haïkel
Looks like we do have some progress on that topic :) So plan B would be: 1. automate EPEL rebuilds in CBS 2. have CI run automated test suite over EPEL rebuilds Correct me if I'm wrong but we would be ok to enable CentOS folks to fix EPEL packaging. It would be easier if we do create an

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-23 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Tuesday, September 22, 2015 08:45:32 PM Karsten Wade wrote: > On 09/22/2015 11:35 AM, Dave Johansen wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Remi Collet > > > > wrote: > >> Le 21/09/2015 16:12, Haïkel a écrit : > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Since the CentOS acquihire,

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-23 Thread Matthew Miller
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:45:32PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > AIUI, the concern is that what is labeled/supported by the CentOS > Project as 'CentOS' needs to go through the CentOS Project QA system. > We simply cannot blindly accept builds from outside of the CentOS > builders just on say-so.

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-23 Thread Andrew Colin Kissa
On 22 Sep 2015, at 8:35 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > +1. I agree that using EPEL rather than trying to replace it is a much better > solution. +1 why "fix" something that is not broken signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-23 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/23/2015 09:49 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 23 September 2015 at 10:31, Matthew Miller > wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:45:32PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >>> AIUI, the concern is that what is

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Monday, September 21, 2015 08:58:21 PM Haïkel wrote: > 2015-09-21 19:46 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi : > > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:12:07 +0200 > > > > Haïkel wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about > >>

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Dave Johansen
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 21/09/2015 16:12, Haïkel a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about EPEL's > future. > > Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, there was little > >

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 20:58:21 +0200 Haïkel wrote: > 2015-09-21 19:46 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi : > > Which tickets do you mean here? They are only rebuilding some > > packages, but not others or? > > Any tickets filed against EPEL, for instance, if a bug

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2015 12:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Also, this would probibly be some kind of big deal to some > people who like that EPEL is built against rhel. > Personally, I don't think it matters, but it would have to > be

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Haïkel
2015-09-22 21:18 GMT+02:00 Dennis Gilmore : > On Monday, September 21, 2015 08:58:21 PM Haïkel wrote: >> 2015-09-21 19:46 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi : >> > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:12:07 +0200 >> > >> > Haïkel wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >>

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Remi Collet
Le 21/09/2015 16:12, Haïkel a écrit : > Hi, > > Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about EPEL's future. > Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, there was little > progress on that topic Just enable EPEL in CBS, and that's all. Remi. P.S. and explain to

[EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Haïkel
Hi, Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about EPEL's future. Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, there was little progress on that topic After a discussion with a Smooge, I decided to come with a proposal, knowing that 1. Fedora wants to keep EPEL within it

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:12:07 +0200 Haïkel wrote: > Hi, > > Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about > EPEL's future. Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, > there was little progress on that topic > > After a discussion with a

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Haïkel
2015-09-21 19:46 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi : > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 16:12:07 +0200 > Haïkel wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Since the CentOS acquihire, there was a lot of discussion about >> EPEL's future. Since the FOSDEM meetup between Fedora/CentOS folks, >> there