On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:14 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:10 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:16 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> >>
> >> All of the ones I've requested, I waited a few days to see if the
> >> maintainer would pick it up. And after that I
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:10 AM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:16 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
>>
>> All of the ones I've requested, I waited a few days to see if the
>> maintainer would pick it up. And after that I asked if they would
>> mind if I maintained it in EPEL8. About
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:16 AM Troy Dawson wrote:
> All of the ones I've requested, I waited a few days to see if the
> maintainer would pick it up. And after that I asked if they would
> mind if I maintained it in EPEL8. About half of those the maintainer
> was fine with me maintaining the
All of the ones I've requested, I waited a few days to see if the
maintainer would pick it up. And after that I asked if they would
mind if I maintained it in EPEL8. About half of those the maintainer
was fine with me maintaining the package in EPEL8.
So, to answer your question, yes you can.
I wonder if we can request the branch and be added as co-maintainer ?
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 13:38 -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> So this came up in the last EPEL meeting:
> bugzilla query -s NEW -t 'epel8' --outputformat "%{id}:
> %{component}:
> %{summary}" | sort | less
>
>
> Most of
Add txt2man, it got filed against el6 for some reason. I just fixed it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741795
Thanks,
Richard
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
