Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

2016-11-02 Thread Alec Leamas
On 02/11/16 17:49, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: I'm still curious if this elegant shell code could be used to enhance the current tests f-r has. As noted, they are extremely expensive, in a class of it's own besides the build and install tasks. I don't think so, f-r works on packages built from a

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

2016-11-02 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> I'm still curious if this elegant shell code could be used to enhance the current tests f-r has. As noted, they are extremely expensive, in a class of it's own besides the build and install tasks. I don't think so, f-r works on packages built from a source rpm. This on the other hand is a brute-

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

2016-11-02 Thread Alec Leamas
On 02/11/16 15:55, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Tuesday, 01 November 2016 at 13:05, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: Actually, a check for this would be useful to have in both fedora-review Actually, f-r is testing this since long. However, the review approach is different: does this

Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: Many directories without owning packages

2016-11-02 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Tuesday, 01 November 2016 at 13:05, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Hi, > > This is mass bug filing material, I have been under the weather > shortly after the first message on this thread but I have made more > progress now. Enough to CC the packaging list too. Actually, a check for this would be