On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 02:16:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 21/03/2015 20:00, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try
> >> "strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |gr
On 21/03/2015 20:00, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try
>> "strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |grep jemalloc", or similarly
>> with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox-bin).
>>
>> W
On 03/21/2015 01:00 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try
"strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |grep jemalloc", or similarly
with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox-bin).
Why isn't thi
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try
> "strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |grep jemalloc", or similarly
> with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox-bin).
>
> Why isn't this recorded in the RPM provides (and w