Re: [Fedora-packaging] bundling of jemalloc

2015-03-23 Thread Niels de Vos
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 02:16:22PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 21/03/2015 20:00, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > >> Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try > >> "strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |gr

Re: [Fedora-packaging] bundling of jemalloc

2015-03-22 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 21/03/2015 20:00, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try >> "strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |grep jemalloc", or similarly >> with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox-bin). >> >> W

Re: [Fedora-packaging] bundling of jemalloc

2015-03-21 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 03/21/2015 01:00 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try "strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |grep jemalloc", or similarly with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox-bin). Why isn't thi

Re: [Fedora-packaging] bundling of jemalloc

2015-03-21 Thread Niels de Vos
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 02:31:03PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Firefox and xulrunner are bundling their own copy of jemalloc (try > "strings /usr/lib64/xulrunner/xulrunner |grep jemalloc", or similarly > with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox-bin). > > Why isn't this recorded in the RPM provides (and w