Re: [Fedora TeX Live] f18beta + texlive 2012: usable texinfo, docbook, doxygen pdf toolchains

2013-01-09 Thread Benjamin De Kosnik
> > >> 3. dblatex > > >> > > >> Currently, dblatex package hasn't been updated to texlive-2012 > > >> dependencies, so it cannot be installed due to the incorrect > > >> passivetex requirements. This is now built for F18 and F19. Interested DocBook users, please test and if it's all ok give ka

Re: [Fedora TeX Live] f18beta + texlive 2012: usable texinfo, docbook, doxygen pdf toolchains

2013-01-03 Thread Benjamin De Kosnik
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:58:32 -0600 Rex Dieter wrote: > On 01/03/2013 06:51 PM, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote: > > >> 3. dblatex > >> > >> Currently, dblatex package hasn't been updated to texlive-2012 > >> dependencies, so it cannot be installed due to the incorrect > >> passivetex requirements. > >>

Re: [Fedora TeX Live] f18beta + texlive 2012: usable texinfo, docbook, doxygen pdf toolchains

2013-01-03 Thread Rex Dieter
On 01/03/2013 06:51 PM, Benjamin De Kosnik wrote: 3. dblatex Currently, dblatex package hasn't been updated to texlive-2012 dependencies, so it cannot be installed due to the incorrect passivetex requirements. This is bug, with patch here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891450 As

Re: [Fedora TeX Live] f18beta + texlive 2012: usable texinfo, docbook, doxygen pdf toolchains

2013-01-03 Thread Benjamin De Kosnik
> 1. doxygen > > Added doxygen deps for pdf output, see: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891452 Fixed, thanks. > 2. docbook5-style-xsl > > Typo, see: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=891459 Fixed, thanks. > 3. dblatex > > Currently, dblatex package hasn't been upd