On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Adam, Adam, Adam ;) it's this one in "updates":
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libreport-2.0.4-1.fc15
Is there an open ticket about the report package that needs to be
bumped to get this cleaned up. It seems from the ticket tra
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:26:41 -0700, AW (Adam) wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 01:23 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:06:17 +0200, JM (Jiri) wrote:
> >
> > > >Whats the way forward from here in F15?
> > > >
> > > >gene/
> > > >
> > >
> > > 1. bumping the version of
On 07/01/2011 04:04 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 08:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, updates-testing is 'you get to keep both halves' territory.
>
> wasn't it stable that broke things (sealert stopped working for example
> after a stable update) - and then something from up
On 06/30/2011 10:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 22:04 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 06/30/2011 08:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Well, updates-testing is 'you get to keep both halves' territory.
>>
>> wasn't it stable that broke things (sealert stopped working
On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 22:04 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 08:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> >
> > Well, updates-testing is 'you get to keep both halves' territory.
>
> wasn't it stable that broke things (sealert stopped working for example
> after a stable update) - and then s
On 06/30/2011 08:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Well, updates-testing is 'you get to keep both halves' territory.
wasn't it stable that broke things (sealert stopped working for example
after a stable update) - and then something from updates testing was
supposed to fix it? But it never made
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 01:23 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:06:17 +0200, JM (Jiri) wrote:
>
> > >Whats the way forward from here in F15?
> > >
> > >gene/
> > >
> >
> > 1. bumping the version of the report-gtk package should do the trick - I
> > already contacted t
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:06:17 +0200, JM (Jiri) wrote:
> >Whats the way forward from here in F15?
> >
> >gene/
> >
>
> 1. bumping the version of the report-gtk package should do the trick - I
> already contacted the maintainer and ask him to do - as this seems to
> work for rawhide:
>
>
On 06/30/2011 07:37 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 12:16 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>>> - I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
>>> the rawhide..
>>
>>
>> Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you p
On 06/30/2011 12:16 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> - I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
>> the rawhide..
>
>
> Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the sufficient
> instructions on how to revert
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> - I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
>> the rawhide..
>
>
> Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the sufficient
> instructions on how t
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:18 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> Actually I'd prefer to know how to move forward to the new way ...
run rawhide!
-jef
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/30/2011 12:16 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> - I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
>> the rawhide..
>
>
> Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the sufficient
> instructions on how to revert
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:51 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> - I was afraid, that it would be against some Fedora policy ;) Then just
> the rawhide..
Okay if this isn't coming to F15, can you provide the sufficient
instructions on how to revert the libreport packages from F15 updates
testing so that
On 06/29/2011 06:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 13:11 +0200, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> On 06/29/2011 12:18 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> On 06/29/2011 03:20 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Hi!
I'm going to replace the report library with the new libreport. Today I
pla
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:24:17 -0400, CM (Camilo) wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> something has broken in F15 for me:
>
> Opps, sealert hit an error!
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/sealert", line 692, in
> run_as_dbus_service(username)
> File "/usr/bin/sealert", line 112, in r
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:24 -0400, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> something has broken in F15 for me:
>
> Opps, sealert hit an error!
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/sealert", line 692, in
> run_as_dbus_service(username)
> File "/usr/bin/sealert", line 112, in r
Hmm,
something has broken in F15 for me:
Opps, sealert hit an error!
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/sealert", line 692, in
run_as_dbus_service(username)
File "/usr/bin/sealert", line 112, in run_as_dbus_service
app = SEAlert(user, dbus_service.presentation_manager
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 13:11 +0200, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 12:18 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 06/29/2011 03:20 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >> I'm going to replace the report library with the new libreport. Today I
> >> plan to replace it in rawhide and if it goes smoothly
On 06/29/2011 01:16 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 06/29/2011 05:50 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> Hi!
>> I'm going to replace the report library with the new libreport. Today I
>> plan to replace it in rawhide and if it goes smoothly I'd like to
>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/29/2011 05:50 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm going to replace the report library with the new libreport. Today I
> plan to replace it in rawhide and if it goes smoothly I'd like to
> replace it in F15 as well.
>
Hasn't this already reac
On 06/29/2011 12:18 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 06/29/2011 03:20 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>> Hi!
>> I'm going to replace the report library with the new libreport. Today I
>> plan to replace it in rawhide and if it goes smoothly I'd like to
>> replace it in F15 as well.
>
> Why in Fedora 15? T
On 06/29/2011 03:20 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> Hi!
> I'm going to replace the report library with the new libreport. Today I
> plan to replace it in rawhide and if it goes smoothly I'd like to
> replace it in F15 as well.
Why in Fedora 15? There seems to be no compelling reason to do that
Rah
Hi!
I'm going to replace the report library with the new libreport. Today I
plan to replace it in rawhide and if it goes smoothly I'd like to
replace it in F15 as well.
pros:
- libreport is written in C (report is in python), so it's easier to
write bindings for other languages
- it's API compa
24 matches
Mail list logo
