Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2021-08-11 Thread Thomas Rodgers
FTBFS issues inline - On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 3:01 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 10:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 18:23, Benjamin Beasley wrote: > > > > > > It looks like none of the packages I maintain or co-maintain that > depend on

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2021-08-11 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 12:08 PM Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 11:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > The rest were not submitted for a rebuild, for some reason. That's > > cpp-hocon, luminance-hdr, openshadinglanguage, and usd. I'm not sure > > why they didn't get submitted. > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2021-08-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 11:00, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The rest were not submitted for a rebuild, for some reason. That's > cpp-hocon, luminance-hdr, openshadinglanguage, and usd. I'm not sure > why they didn't get submitted. Those four packages cannot be updated by rpmdev-bumpspec: RPMAutoSpec

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2021-08-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Wed, 11 Aug 2021 at 10:21, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 18:23, Benjamin Beasley wrote: > > > > It looks like none of the packages I maintain or co-maintain that depend on > > boost-devel were rebuilt before the side tag was merged. > > > > Some (luminance-hdr, cpp-hocon)

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2021-08-11 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 at 18:23, Benjamin Beasley wrote: > > It looks like none of the packages I maintain or co-maintain that depend on > boost-devel were rebuilt before the side tag was merged. > > Some (luminance-hdr, cpp-hocon) had automated FTI bugs filed; these were > fixed by a manual

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2021-08-10 Thread Benjamin Beasley
It looks like none of the packages I maintain or co-maintain that depend on boost-devel were rebuilt before the side tag was merged. Some (luminance-hdr, cpp-hocon) had automated FTI bugs filed; these were fixed by a manual rebuild on my part. Another (usd) should be in the same boat once some

[HEADS UP] Fedora 35 Boost 1.76 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2021-08-06 Thread Jonathan Wakely
We are starting the rebuilds for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F35Boost176 in the f35-boost side tag. If your package depends on Boost, or just if you see a "Rebuilt for Boost 1.76" commit pushed to your package's dist-git repo, please co-ordinate with me and Tom Rodgers (CC'd) about any