Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

2024-04-05 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 28. 03. 24 v 12:40 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): I will do the change only for: ./bitstream-vera-fonts.spec:License: Bitstream Vera ./bpg-fonts.spec:License:   Bitstream Vera ./bpg-fonts.spec:License:   Bitstream Vera ./bpg-fonts.spec:License:   Bitstream Vera ./bpg-fonts.spec:

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

2024-03-28 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 28. 03. 24 v 10:59 dop. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): I also think the conversion should only be done if the full License string can be converted. Partial conversion is confusing, and there is not much value, since trivial conversion is, well, trivial, and whoever will eventually n

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

2024-03-28 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 08:32:41PM +0200, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: > > 27. maaliskuuta 2024 12.59.11 GMT+02:00 Petr Pisar > kirjoitti: > >V Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > >> I have no strong opinion how to process with the case of  "MIT and BSD and > >> Bitstre

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

2024-03-27 Thread Otto Liljalaakso
27. maaliskuuta 2024 12.59.11 GMT+02:00 Petr Pisar kirjoitti: >V Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): >> I have no strong opinion how to process with the case of  "MIT and BSD and >> Bitstream Vera and OFL". I think that converting it to " MIT and BSD and >> Bitstream

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

2024-03-27 Thread Petr Pisar
V Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > I have no strong opinion how to process with the case of  "MIT and BSD and > Bitstream Vera and OFL". I think that converting it to " MIT and BSD and > Bitstream-Vera and OFL" is probably best option. I.e. the License tag will > b

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

2024-03-27 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 27. 03. 24 v 7:40 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): Dne 26. 03. 24 v 6:00 odp. Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a): If we're going to introduce any kind of (semi-)automatic conversion of existing license tags, I think it'd be good to make "convert «and» and «or» to upper-case" part of the process. A.F

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

2024-03-26 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 26. 03. 24 v 6:00 odp. Artur Frenszek-Iwicki napsal(a): If we're going to introduce any kind of (semi-)automatic conversion of existing license tags, I think it'd be good to make "convert «and» and «or» to upper-case" part of the process. A.FI. [0]https://spdx.github.io/spdx-spec/v2.3/SPDX-

Re: [SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

2024-03-26 Thread Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
> I have no strong opinion how to process with the case of > "MIT and BSD and Bitstream Vera and OFL". I think that > converting it to " MIT and BSD and Bitstream-Vera and OFL" > is probably best option. I'll go on a tiny bit of a tangent here: SPDX spec says that license expression operators (AND

[SPDX] Mass license change: Intro and change of "Bitstream Vera" to "Bitstream-Vera"

2024-03-26 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Hi. The last phase of SPDX migration has been approved    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_4 Part of this change is automatic changes of "trivial" changes. Let's do a step back and state loudly what is and what is not trivial change: By trivial we understand change wh