On 9/18/19 17:41, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-09-18, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hm, did perl get moved to the modular repo? That sounds like it is going
to cause more issues than solve as it's not a leaf package. Why can't it
stay as a regular package?
Perl is still a regular package and until Fedora
I want to keep "old" stuff in, because there's no reason to drop the support
for systems that we already support, if we can do so without breaking anything.
On September 18, 2019 7:07:30 PM UTC, "Anderson, Charles R"
wrote:
>So, not only do you want to keep "old" stuff in Fedora (i686), but now
So, not only do you want to keep "old" stuff in Fedora (i686), but now you want
to revert/remove "new" stuff (modules) too? I'm beginning to think that Fedora
just isn't a good fit for you.
On Wed, Sep 18, 2019 at 06:22:52PM +, John M. Harris, Jr. wrote:
> Removing modules is a potential so
Removing modules is a potential solution to this, as it would simplify package
management.
On September 18, 2019 8:29:49 AM UTC, Petr Pisar wrote:
>On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> Error:
>> Problem 1: package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires
>> libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but no
On 2019-09-18, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hm, did perl get moved to the modular repo? That sounds like it is going
> to cause more issues than solve as it's not a leaf package. Why can't it
> stay as a regular package?
>
Perl is still a regular package and until Fedora allows modules in
a build root
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 09:15 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 9/17/19 4:04 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
>
> > Since this is a Beta release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or
> > missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the
> > Fedora QA team via the mailing list or i
On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 12:11 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 9/18/19 10:29, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > > - package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is
> > > excluded
> >
> > Funnily DNF finds out that you could actually get that package
> Featuritis? Actually, do not see any usefulness in any module.
*any* module ?
Maybe you just haven't met the right use case yet.
I maintain packages of MariaDB and MySQL projects. There's no better
way I can imagine, to develop two version of the packages of the DB,
than modules.
Fedora have Mar
On 9/18/19 12:11 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 9/18/19 10:29, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is
excluded
Funnily DNF finds out that you could actually get that package satisfied
if you enabled a modula
On 9/18/19 10:29, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
- package perl-libs-4:5.28.2-439.module_f31+6019+b24e098f.x86_64 is
excluded
Funnily DNF finds out that you could actually get that package satisfied
if you enabled a modular Perl. Unfortunatelly DNF does not report
On 2019-09-18, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires
> libperl.so.5.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>- package crypto-utils-2.5-4.fc29.x86_64 requires
> perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0), but none of the providers can
On 9/17/19 4:04 PM, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Since this is a Beta release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or
missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact the
Fedora QA team via the mailing list or in #fedora-qa on Freenode.
Some not so pleasant results:
# dnf system
12 matches
Mail list logo
