Il 22/05/2014 06:55, Mikolaj Izdebski ha scritto:
On 05/21/2014 08:06 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
So, who needed log4j2? It is massively incompatible with log4j1.2 and
isn't a simple port job. I would argue if log4j2 was actually needed,
it should have been introduced as a separate log4j2 package
On 21 May 2014 17:03, Robert Rati rr...@redhat.com wrote:
I've been working on updating the hadoop package to the latest 2.4.0
release and at this point I've resolved all the issues but I'm now blocked
by the log4j2 update. log4j2 breaks the hadoop build pretty severely, and
it doesn't seem
So, who needed log4j2? It is massively incompatible with log4j1.2 and
isn't a simple port job. I would argue if log4j2 was actually needed,
it should have been introduced as a separate log4j2 package and allow
projects to port to it as they have time/need. This update log4j to an
...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2014 9:06:07 PM
Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Hadoop + log4j2 = fullstop
So, who needed log4j2? It is massively incompatible with log4j1.2 and
isn't a simple port job. I would argue if log4j2 was actually needed,
it should have been introduced
On 05/21/2014 08:06 PM, Robert Rati wrote:
So, who needed log4j2? It is massively incompatible with log4j1.2 and
isn't a simple port job. I would argue if log4j2 was actually needed,
it should have been introduced as a separate log4j2 package and allow
projects to port to it as they have