You're welcome! ^_^
And don't forget about whether it is either
'MIT and GPLv3(+)' ---> GPL supersedes MIT
or
'MIT or GPLv3(+)' ---> both licenses are equal and independent
That's another HUGE difference in meaning of the licensing chosen by
upstream…
Am 05.04.2016 um 14:41 schrieb P
Thank You for clarification. I will ask of upstream how it is with GPLv3 &
GPLv3+.
Cheers,
Petr
On 5.4.2016 13:52, Björn Esser wrote:
> Hi!
>
> When looking at the github-repo, I found a file "LICENSE" [1], which states
> python-cheat is dual-licensed… Since the term "dual-licensing" usually
Hi!
When looking at the github-repo, I found a file "LICENSE" [1], which
states python-cheat is dual-licensed… Since the term "dual-licensing"
usually means, that you can freely apply either combination of the named
licenses, either using a chosen single license from the offered ones, or
a c
Hi,
I need an advice/feedback about licenses. I want to add package
**python-cheat** to F25 (and maybe to F24 too).
However, the project is now under MIT + GLPv3 licenses - not only some parts,
it is meaned by upstream
as whole project is MIT and GPLv3. From my point of view, there is not problem
