On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> Thomas Spura wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
>>
>> Why?
>> We already do that on fedora so nothing will change.
>> (Right now we have a symlink fro
Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
>
> Why?
> We already do that on fedora so nothing will change.
> (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other
> way around like in th
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
Why?
We already do that on fedora so nothing will change.
(Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other
way around like in the pep, but the result for a user i
acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel