Re: [python] pep 394 is accepted

2012-02-17 Thread Thomas Spura
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > Thomas Spura wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >>> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users >> >> Why? >> We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. >> (Right now we have a symlink fro

Re: [python] pep 394 is accepted

2012-02-17 Thread Neal Becker
Thomas Spura wrote: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote: >> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users > > Why? > We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. > (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other > way around like in th

Re: [python] pep 394 is accepted

2012-02-17 Thread Thomas Spura
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote: > acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users Why? We already do that on fedora so nothing will change. (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other way around like in the pep, but the result for a user i

[python] pep 394 is accepted

2012-02-17 Thread Neal Becker
acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel