Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:39 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote: > Can you give any more details on 32-bit ARM in particular -- is it just > i686 that is experiencing issues, or have you seen similar memory > corruption issues on 32-bit ARM as well? > Just another gentle ping --

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 12:32 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > The fact that the 389-ds code works on other architectures does not > allow us to draw any conclusions at this point. > Can you give any more details on 32-bit ARM in particular -- is it just i686 that is experiencing issues,

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

On 02/23/2018 10:29 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On pe, 23 helmi 2018, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 02/23/2018 09:58 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: >>> Greetings gcc maintainers! >>> >>> A FESCo issue[0] has been filed due to the dropping of 389-ds-base and >&g

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

On pe, 23 helmi 2018, Jeff Law wrote: On 02/23/2018 09:58 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: Greetings gcc maintainers! A FESCo issue[0] has been filed due to the dropping of 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches for Fedora 28. This was done without a change request being filed, so FESCo is trying

Re: 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

On 02/23/2018 09:58 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings gcc maintainers! > > A FESCo issue[0] has been filed due to the dropping of 389-ds-base and > freeipa on 32 bit arches for Fedora 28. This was done without a change > request being filed, so FESCo is trying to decide how

389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches

Greetings gcc maintainers! A FESCo issue[0] has been filed due to the dropping of 389-ds-base and freeipa on 32 bit arches for Fedora 28. This was done without a change request being filed, so FESCo is trying to decide how best to handle it. It seems there are some concerns about whether the C