On 11/22/2011 04:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks.
So in the recent proven tester discussion, and in various other threads,
I've oft stated that the limits of the current Bodhi karma system are a
significant problem, and the planned Bodhi 2.0 karma system has to
potentially to
On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 17:24 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
IMHO, this seems like the sort of thing that would benefit from a
discussion session at the upcoming FUDCon where there will be members of
the Fedora Design team and the main coders of Bodhi. Not that I want to
do it in secret, but coming
On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 08:44 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 02:03:16PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:58 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
With the above information what benefits/value will we have by having
proven tester over fas tester
Adam Williamson wrote:
In the Great Bodhi Of The Future, for any given update, a tester will
not simply have a comment box and a drop-down for -1, 0 or +1. They will
see:
* The list of test cases associated with the package, with a PASS / FAIL
choice for each
* Checkboxes for 'This
Hey, folks.
So in the recent proven tester discussion, and in various other threads,
I've oft stated that the limits of the current Bodhi karma system are a
significant problem, and the planned Bodhi 2.0 karma system has to
potentially to significantly improve our update testing process. But it
On 11/22/2011 09:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
2. Any update marked as 'critpath breaking' by a proven tester would be
blocked from being pushed stable at all - automatically or manually -
until the PT modified the feedback or it was overridden by someone with
appropriately godlike powers
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:31 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/22/2011 09:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
2. Any update marked as 'critpath breaking' by a proven tester would be
blocked from being pushed stable at all - automatically or manually -
until the PT modified the feedback or
On 11/22/2011 09:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:31 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 11/22/2011 09:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
2. Any update marked as 'critpath breaking' by a proven tester would be
blocked from being pushed stable at all - automatically or
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 21:58 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
With the above information what benefits/value will we have by having
proven tester over fas tester hitting the panic button
( since no addinal testing is being performed by the proven tester over
fas-tester thus it makes no
On 11/22/2011 10:03 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The proposal is to treat a PT hitting the panic button even more
dramatically than a registered user hitting it, the idea being that PTs
should be somewhat better informed and hence less likely to trigger it
falsely, and that we have the mechanism
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:03:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
* The list of test cases associated with the package, with a PASS / FAIL
choice for each
A Did not test choice is missing here.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 23:28 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 01:03:05PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
* The list of test cases associated with the package, with a PASS / FAIL
choice for each
A Did not test choice is missing here.
Sorry, indeed I didn't make that clear -
tis 2011-11-22 klockan 13:03 -0800 skrev Adam Williamson:
* Any custom choices the package maintainer opts to provide, via some
kind of interface to Bodhi
* Checkboxes per bug assigned to the update for indicating that the
update have been verified to fix that specific bug.
* When the update
On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 02:19 +0100, Henrik Nordström wrote:
tis 2011-11-22 klockan 13:03 -0800 skrev Adam Williamson:
* Any custom choices the package maintainer opts to provide, via some
kind of interface to Bodhi
* Checkboxes per bug assigned to the update for indicating that the
tis 2011-11-22 klockan 14:03 -0800 skrev Adam Williamson:
The proposal is to treat a PT hitting the panic button even more
dramatically than a registered user hitting it, the idea being that PTs
should be somewhat better informed and hence less likely to trigger it
falsely, and that we have
15 matches
Mail list logo
