On 17/10/11, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 17/10/11 20:02, Alex Lancaster wrote:
>> Looking at the changelog, it isn't obvious whether this
>> introduces any ABI/API changes or not, hence this e-mail.
> I just asked Dane on IRC and he confirms that they are not compatible so
> the soname needs to be b
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:02:29 -0400 (EDT)
Alex Lancaster wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Looks like mapnik has been bumped from 0.7 to 2.0 upstream:
>
> http://mapnik.org/news/2011/sep/26/release_2_0/
>
> I am rebuilding mapnik in rawhide to fix broken deps, and I
> was wondering if any maintainers of m
On 17/10/11 20:02, Alex Lancaster wrote:
> Looking at the changelog, it isn't obvious whether this
> introduces any ABI/API changes or not, hence this e-mail.
I just asked Dane on IRC and he confirms that they are not compatible so
the soname needs to be bumped.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compto
Hi there,
Looks like mapnik has been bumped from 0.7 to 2.0 upstream:
http://mapnik.org/news/2011/sep/26/release_2_0/
I am rebuilding mapnik in rawhide to fix broken deps, and I
was wondering if any maintainers of mapnik-dependent packages
had any opinions on whether updating to 2.0 would have a
