FYI,
ARPACK 3.0, featuring a soname bump, has been built in rawhide. If it
becomes necessary, I'll build the update in released branches as well.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, TASAKA Mamoru
wrote:
> Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started
>> maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2].
>>
>
> AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new review request.
Jussi Lehtola wrote, at 12/12/2011 03:46 AM +9:00:
> Hi,
>
> Recently, a collaboration has picked up the pieces and started
> maintaining a new fork of ARPACK [2].
>
AFAIK forking or renaming will always require new review request.
e.g.
fork; util-linux -> util-linux-ng
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 19:41:13 +
José Matos wrote:
> On 12/11/2011 06:46 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > ARPACK used to be a project at Rice University [1], but they
> > abandoned it many years ago. After that many projects (e.g. Octave
> > and Scilab) started bundling their own patched versions of
On 12/11/2011 06:46 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> ARPACK used to be a project at Rice University [1], but they abandoned
> it many years ago. After that many projects (e.g. Octave and Scilab)
> started bundling their own patched versions of the software to fix the
> bugs they had found in th
Hi,
ARPACK used to be a project at Rice University [1], but they abandoned
it many years ago. After that many projects (e.g. Octave and Scilab)
started bundling their own patched versions of the software to fix the
bugs they had found in the package. The Fedora and Debian packages had
their own p
