Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Petr Machata
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org writes: We should not include preprocessed source files by default without the user knowing and agreeing. People use gcc to build proprietary source still. There's a check box to this effect in ABRT. It's not much different from sending backtraces or some

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Peter Robinson
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can access to get the files out from. I've been bitten by this several

Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Andrew Haley
On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can access to get the files out from. I've been bitten by this several times. We need to find a better way to handle issues like this:

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Marek Polacek
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:56:20AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote: On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote: Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Peter Robinson
Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXX.out file is not exactly fun. In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXX.out files to its reports as well. From time to time we get reports as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189122, but such a bug

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Josh Boyer
On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXX.out file is not exactly fun. In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXX.out files to its reports as well. From time to time we get

Re: Access to failed builds [Was: gcc5 ICE xserver build on ARM]

2015-02-17 Thread Marek Polacek
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:19:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXX.out file is not exactly fun. In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the