On Friday, January 18, 2013 23:35:24 Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 18.01.13 22:49, Andreas Tunek (andreas.tu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > I think you have a good point, but adding every imaginable featw into
> > glibc
> > is not really a good solution. Maybe glib is a better place for these
> > k
On Fri, 18.01.13 22:49, Andreas Tunek (andreas.tu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I think you have a good point, but adding every imaginable featw into glibc
> is not really a good solution. Maybe glib is a better place for these kinds
> of functions?
Because doing this externally is really hard. I wrote
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:49 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>
> On Jan 18, 2013 8:48 PM, "Lennart Poettering"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 18.01.13 20:20, Björn Persson (bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
> >
> > > If your functions get added to GlibC, then they will only be
> available
> > > in GNU systems (un
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:49 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> I think you have a good point, but adding every imaginable featw into
> glibc is not really a good solution. Maybe glib is a better place for
> these kinds of functions?
If glibc didn't already have DNS API, that might be a more reasonable
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 22:49 +0100, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Maybe glib is a better place for these kinds of functions?
Already exists:
http://developer.gnome.org/gio/2.34/GResolver.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Jan 18, 2013 8:48 PM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18.01.13 20:20, Björn Persson (bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
>
> > If your functions get added to GlibC, then they will only be available
> > in GNU systems (unless other vendors decide to clone them) and programs
> > that use them wil
On Fri, 18.01.13 20:20, Björn Persson (bjorn@rombobjörn.se) wrote:
> If your functions get added to GlibC, then they will only be available
> in GNU systems (unless other vendors decide to clone them) and programs
> that use them will be tied to GNU or will need workarounds in their
> configuratio
Nick Jones wrote:
> One feature I would like to see added to future glibc, is a fully
> asynchronous version of getaddrinfo, and also getnameinfo.
>
> Asynchronous for non filesystem fds at least.
>
> The glibc maintainers don't seem to be against this idea and I am
> willing to put time into d
