On 06/15/2014 11:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
Since there are sixteen variants of the library, I am providing sixteen
corresponding pkg-config files. When another program uses the library,
by using pkg-config in their Makefile (or other build system), it will
ensure that they are getting the
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:57 AM, Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com
wrote:
Otherwise it could create a situation where software developed
on Fedora relies on .pc files and doesn't work on other distros, and the
other way around: software developed on other distros won't use the nice
Hi,
On 06/16/2014 08:57 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 06/15/2014 11:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
Since there are sixteen variants of the library, I am providing sixteen
corresponding pkg-config files. When another program uses the library,
by using pkg-config in their Makefile (or other build
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
On 06/16/2014 08:57 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
On 06/15/2014 11:32 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
Since there are sixteen variants of the library, I am providing sixteen
corresponding pkg-config files. When another program
Because a new version of the Free42 calculator has switched to the Intel
decimal floating point library (an implementation of the decimal part of
IEEE-754), I'm working on packaging it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098820
Intel supplies it as portable code intended to be
Eric Smith wrote:
I don't really understand how this is adding to the API or results in
incompatibilities. Do other people think that doing this is a mistake?
Would it actually be better for the package not to provide pkg-config
files?
The reason we do not recommend adding non-upstream
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
wrote:
Eric Smith wrote:
I don't really understand how this is adding to the API or results in
incompatibilities. Do other people think that doing this is a mistake?
Would it actually be better for the package not to