On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:17:12AM -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
I'm trying to get the new version of maildrop ready and they split out
unicode support into a new library. The name of their archive is
courier-unicode, but the actual name of the library installed is
libunicode. That's what I
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Naming the package libunicode could be safer with regard to avoiding a
clash with another future project with the same name. But if following the
guidelines, I would name it courier-unicode.
IMHO, the potential for conflicts and confusion with other projects is
I don't think libunicode is a good name, actually it's too common and
should be avoided.
You should also ask upstream about the potential file conflicts.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I'm trying to get the new version of maildrop ready and they split out
unicode support into a new library. The name of their archive is
courier-unicode, but the actual name of the library installed is
libunicode. That's what I picked after looking at a few other libs. I
don't see any specific
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:17 PM, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm trying to get the new version of maildrop ready and they split out
unicode support into a new library. The name of their archive is
courier-unicode, but the actual name of the library installed is
libunicode. That's what
On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:17:12 -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
I'm trying to get the new version of maildrop ready and they split out
unicode support into a new library. The name of their archive is
courier-unicode, but the actual name of the library installed is
libunicode. That's what I picked
