Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> In case I wasn't clear, I would like to change the upstream
> (ie. URL/Source) of the current american-fuzzy-lop package.
That's what Neal Gompa is suggesting, too, but I think this is rather
misleading if the new upstream actually calls itself AFL++.
> If we consider
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 05:30:18PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > If we switch it's likely that we won't easily be able to go back.
>
> If you use properly versioned Obsoletes, then going back is as easy as
> unretiring the original package, increasing EVR ab
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> If we switch it's likely that we won't easily be able to go back.
If you use properly versioned Obsoletes, then going back is as easy as
unretiring the original package, increasing EVR above the version in the
Obsoletes, and adding a versioned Obsoletes the other way
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 11:04 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I'm packaging American Fuzzy Loop (AFL) a fuzzing tool in Fedora.
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/american-fuzzy-lop
>
> This is the upstream we're using:
>
> https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/
> https://github.com/google/AF
I'm packaging American Fuzzy Loop (AFL) a fuzzing tool in Fedora.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/american-fuzzy-lop
This is the upstream we're using:
https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/afl/
https://github.com/google/AFL
Upstream is dead. -ish. To be more precise there's some but not a
grea
