On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 23:00 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 15. 04. 21 22:21, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
> >
> > In this case, presumably only `rxvt` fits the bill here as it is
> > causing a conflict, so... perhaps I should add it to `fedora-
> > obsolete-
> > packages` for F32, F33, and F3
On 15. 04. 21 22:21, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
From looking at fedora-obsolete-packages' various branches, it looks
like packages are only meant to be listed for one release cycle, and
then removed (so the Rawhide branch's list of packages will get removed
in F36).
Actually, it should be t
From looking at fedora-obsolete-packages' various branches, it looks
like packages are only meant to be listed for one release cycle, and
then removed (so the Rawhide branch's list of packages will get removed
in F36).
How do we handle packages that were not added to this in time? e.g.
when I dist
