On Fri, 2018-12-14 at 09:10 +, Mattia Verga wrote:
> Il 12/13/18 3:36 PM, Randy Barlow ha scritto:
> > * Remove critpath karma[5].
> >
> I know Fedora wants to move to a more community driven process, but
> I
> think the ideas behind adamw proposal [1] of the critpath field are
> still
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 09:36 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> * Change how the edit APIs work so that a diff is sent rather than
> the
> entire set of fields[4].
>
>
> [4] https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/2208
I've made this one a little more expansive - the real problem is that
Il 12/13/18 3:36 PM, Randy Barlow ha scritto:
> * Remove critpath karma[5].
>
I know Fedora wants to move to a more community driven process, but I
think the ideas behind adamw proposal [1] of the critpath field are
still valid.
I think we could make regular users post regular karma only and
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 09:36:09AM -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 01:40 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Is there an executive summary as to what's backwards incompatible and
> > what the impact on the average user is? A quick look at the kanban
> > doesn't give me any
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 01:40 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Is there an executive summary as to what's backwards incompatible and
> what the impact on the average user is? A quick look at the kanban
> doesn't give me any understanding :)
Each of the issues on the kanban board is a proposal to make
> Greetings fellow Fedorans!
>
> I am about to start working on a set of backwards incompatible changes
> to Bodhi for its upcoming 4.0.0 release (Bodhi follows Semantic
> Versioning[0]):
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/projects/6
>
> If the thought of backwards incompatible changes to
Greetings fellow Fedorans!
I am about to start working on a set of backwards incompatible changes
to Bodhi for its upcoming 4.0.0 release (Bodhi follows Semantic
Versioning[0]):
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/projects/6
If the thought of backwards incompatible changes to Bodhi raises one
