This is an ordinary bug, probably in some X11 driver, perhaps
mach64_drv.
In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little
attention
to anything except the big 3: current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel
graphics.
3D [alpha blending, etc.] has taken developer resources away from
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:11 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
In the X.log I see:
[ 182.375] Backtrace:
[ 182.375] 0: Xorg (xorg_backtrace+0x36) [0x464d46]
[ 182.375] 1: Xorg (0x40+0x69d99) [0x469d99]
[ 182.375] 2: /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x7f315a2bf000+0xefe0)
On 08/16/2012 06:24 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
This is an ordinary bug, probably in some X11 driver, perhaps
mach64_drv.
In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little
attention
to anything except the big 3: current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel
graphics.
3D [alpha blending,
On 08/16/2012 07:13 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 09:11 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
In practice for the last 2 years, I notice that X11 pays little attention
to anything except the big 3: current Radeon, nVidia, and Intel graphics.
3D [alpha blending, etc.] has taken developer
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 07:47 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
New Radeon 9250 cards [RV280] were advertised by Fry's Electronics on August
3;
advantages: $50 cheap, perhaps low profile, perhaps available in AGP.
There are thousands of such cards appearing in used equipment channels
because of the
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400,
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Yeah, sorry that the devices that need the most work are the ones that
get the most work. In the future we'll be sure to focus on end-of-lifed
hardware with feature-complete drivers.
Even where you guys couldn't
On 08/16/2012 07:52 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 07:47 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
New Radeon 9250 cards [RV280] were advertised by Fry's Electronics on August
3;
advantages: $50 cheap, perhaps low profile, perhaps available in AGP.
There are thousands of such cards
On 08/16/2012 08:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400,
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working, I have gotten work around
advice. For example, Airlie told me how to disable AGP in order to prevent
lockups on my
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
The wiki page says that the ServerKMSDrivers are 100% implemented,
so they should be testable in F-18 Alpha.
However, the wiki page also says MGA SE or AST only.
What about a KMS vesafb?
What would a KMS vesafb even be?
--
On 08/16/2012 11:55 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
The wiki page says that the ServerKMSDrivers are 100% implemented,
so they should be testable in F-18 Alpha.
However, the wiki page also says MGA SE or AST only.
What about a KMS
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 12:28 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
On 08/16/2012 11:55 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 07:31:39AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
What about a KMS vesafb?
What would a KMS vesafb even be?
Something good enough so that the combination of {kernel, Xorg
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:28:43PM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
Something good enough so that the combination of {kernel, Xorg server,
Xorg device driver} would satisfy Gnome3's desires for a display
that did not suffer fallback mode.
Vesa should already be running llvmpipe and not triggering
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:21:16 -0700,
John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
On 08/16/2012 08:52 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:13:14 -0400,
Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
Even where you guys couldn't get stuff working, I have gotten work around
advice.
On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:06 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
I disagree with the resource allocation decision that RV280 is not worthy
of the attention that is necessary to provide the functionality required by
Gnome3.
Of the approximately nine functionally different generations of radeons
on the
Hi,
When trying to do a test install of F17 on server hardware (a dual
AMD Opteron system from 2006 with 1 GB of memory), I noticed several
issues, while CentOS 6.3 installs fine. So I want to share my
experiences, ask for your feedback, and then file bugs when needed.
There are 3 major issues,
(1)
The system has 3 NIC's, 2x Broadcom BCM5704 and 1x Netgear GA630.
I use a BCM5704 for network install. This works fine on CentOS with
ksdevice=link. With F17 I see multiple dhcp being started, resulting
in multiple timeouts (I even see a second dhcp being started for em2
while just
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 17:04 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
Hi,
When trying to do a test install of F17 on server hardware (a dual
AMD Opteron system from 2006 with 1 GB of memory), I noticed several
issues, while CentOS 6.3 installs fine. So I want to share my
experiences, ask for your feedback,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:11:42AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
The system has 3 NIC's, 2x Broadcom BCM5704 and 1x Netgear GA630.
I use a BCM5704 for network install. This works fine on CentOS with
ksdevice=link. With F17 I see multiple dhcp being started, resulting
in multiple timeouts (I
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 19:51 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 09:48:19AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
A wild shot in the dark, but not
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F17_bugs#ksdevice-case-sensitive ?
I wrote that because we had one person who was using
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:29:10AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Implementing growing of raid partitions such that an arbitrary number
of partitions always grow at the same rate and end up the same size is
quite difficult. There are just more important things that we need to
work on.
Hmm...
On 08/09/2012 01:04 PM, Jos Vos wrote:
--yesiknowwhatiamdoingbutitaketherisk ;-).
I think you misspelled %pre
:)
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
21 matches
Mail list logo
