On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 16:55 +0200, Karel Klíč wrote:
Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com writes:
eu-readelf does a lot more than you seem to need (you want to at least
use --numeric-addresses, so it doesn't try to map all addresses it
prints out to the associated symbol names).
Attached is a
Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com writes:
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 21:00 +0100, Karel Klíč wrote:
eu-readelf -winfo/-wline output is huge, so it takes several days to
make one attampt to check whole rawhide repository. This slows
development a bit.
eu-readelf does a lot more than you seem to need
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:55:35 +0200, Karel Klíč wrote:
I have observed GDB displaying wrong source file lines when stepping through
a program several times, and I think such a check could discover some
issues.
Could you provide a reproducer? How it could be fixed by the package
maintainer?
If
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com writes:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:55:35 +0200, Karel Klíč wrote:
I have observed GDB displaying wrong source file lines when stepping through
a program several times, and I think such a check could discover some
issues.
Could you provide a reproducer?
I
On Fri, 2011-03-18 at 21:00 +0100, Karel Klíč wrote:
eu-readelf -winfo/-wline output is huge, so it takes several days to
make one attampt to check whole rawhide repository. This slows
development a bit.
eu-readelf does a lot more than you seem to need (you want to at least
use
Jan Kratochvil jan.kratoch...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:10 +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
Is there something else that should be checked?
Sometimes references to the source file dirname/filename are broken.
One fix for all packages:
debugedit: Include empty CU current
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:28:10AM +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
component: cduce (rjones)
file: cduce-0.5.3-8.fc15.i686/usr/bin/cduce
- debuginfo missing; ELF stripped
file: cduce-0.5.3-8.fc15.i686/usr/bin/dtd2cduce
- debuginfo missing; ELF stripped
This and
Ben Boeckel wrote:
Anything with ghc-* can be ignored; ghc does not have debuginfo in its
libraries. A list of other Haskell packages which don't fit the ghc-*
pattern can be gathered as well.
Ok, I modified the script to skip Haskell packages. The list is not
needed, a simple detection logic
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 03:08:37PM +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
I modified the script to skip OCaml-generated packages. There seem to be
no reasonable way to correctly detect OCaml-generated _binaries_.
I had a quick look at ELF headers and so on, but I think you are
right. One issue is that no
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:28:10AM +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
component: cduce (rjones)
file: cduce-0.5.3-8.fc15.i686/usr/bin/cduce
- debuginfo missing; ELF stripped
file: cduce-0.5.3-8.fc15.i686/usr/bin/dtd2cduce
- debuginfo missing; ELF stripped
This and many of the other ones that you
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The OCaml compiler doesn't generate DWARF output (because nothing at the
moment could consume it, so what would be the point).
Uh, GDB could consume it (for ocamlopt native compilation, not for bytecode
compilation, of course), you can use GDB to debug languages not
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:10 +0100,
KK == Karel Klic kk...@redhat.com wrote:
KK component: Canna (tagoh)
KK file: Canna-3.7p3-31.fc15.i686/usr/bin/cannaping
KK- debuginfo missing; ELF stripped
KK file: Canna-3.7p3-31.fc15.i686/usr/sbin/cannaserver
KK- debuginfo missing; ELF stripped
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure, at least, it is used in kernel and glibc spec. Also mentionned
in the RPM package creation howto featured in Packages Maintainer wiki page.
Actually, we don't generate -debuginfo packages[1], so I'd say the
script is looking for the debuginfo
On 02/24/2011 10:33 AM, Radek Vokál wrote:
Thanks Karel, I vote for opening bugs for all of these. Especially those
which are ELF stripped might even have wrong compiler flags.
See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=DebugInfo
These have been caught by debugrepo-check [1] which
Ben Boeckel wrote:
Anything with ghc-* can be ignored; ghc does not have debuginfo in its
libraries. A list of other Haskell packages which don't fit the ghc-*
pattern can be gathered as well.
Actually, GHC has something somewhat equivalent to debuginfo, but it's in a
completely different
Karel Klic wrote:
component: kdissert (rdieter)
file: kdissert-1.0.7-8.fc15.i686/usr/lib/kde3/libkdissapplet.so
- debuginfo missing; ELF is not stripped
file: kdissert-1.0.7-8.fc15.i686/usr/lib/kde3/libkdisshtmldoc.so
- debuginfo missing; ELF is not stripped
file:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:10 +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
I have written a script which checks the completeness and correctness of the
debuginfo packages.
Thanks, it would be great to run it automatically like the `Broken deps'
checker.
Regarding the report below: it is interesting that
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:10 +0100, Karel wrote:
- debuginfo symlink points to another binary in another RPM package which
might not be installed
Which is perfectly normal for subpackages, isn't it?
There is only a single -debuginfo package for a src.rpm, but the src.rpm
may build
On 24.2.2011 at 16:17, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 09:28:10 +0100, Karel wrote:
- debuginfo symlink points to another binary in another RPM package
which might not be installed
Which is perfectly normal for subpackages, isn't it?
There is only a single -debuginfo
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 16:53:07 +0100, Karel wrote:
Is this explanation understandable?
Yes.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Karel Klic kk...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
Anything with ghc-* can be ignored; ghc does not have debuginfo in its
libraries. A list of other Haskell packages which don't fit the ghc-*
pattern can be gathered as well.
--Ben
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Le 25/02/2011 01:57, Ben Boeckel a écrit :
Karel Klic kk...@redhat.com wrote:
snip
Anything with ghc-* can be ignored; ghc does not have debuginfo in its
libraries. A list of other Haskell packages which don't fit the ghc-*
pattern can be gathered as well.
--Ben
why not just disabling
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com wrote:
%define _enable_debug_packages %{nil}
%define debug_package %{nil}
Is the first required now? Currently only the second is used.
Le 25/02/2011 02:13, Ben Boeckel a écrit :
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com wrote:
%define _enable_debug_packages %{nil}
%define debug_package %{nil}
Is the first required now? Currently only the second is used.
component: CCfits (sergiopr)
file:
CCfits-debuginfo-2.3-2.fc15.i686/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/da/7236759b8c63fab2925bd308123b9b277a238c
- unused debuginfo, binary is not packaged: /usr/bin/cookbook
The debuginfo is collected from the %buildroot directories. There is an
rpmbuild check
Roland McGrath wrote, at 02/25/2011 10:16 AM +9:00:
component: CCfits (sergiopr)
file:
CCfits-debuginfo-2.3-2.fc15.i686/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/da/7236759b8c63fab2925bd308123b9b277a238c
- unused debuginfo, binary is not packaged: /usr/bin/cookbook
The debuginfo is collected from the
26 matches
Mail list logo
