I use mock to local build packages.
I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
How I fix it ?
GEN gnome-control-center.1
I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl
warning: failed to load external entity
"ht
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> I use mock to local build packages.
> I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
> How I fix it ?
> GEN gnome-control-center.1
> I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/curren
I use original .spec file. It in attachment.
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 21:33 -0700, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > I use mock to local build packages.
> > I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
> > How I fix it ?
> > GEN gnome-con
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> I use original .spec file. It in attachment.
Why are you using an unreleased git source?
Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/control-center-3.8.1.5-1.fc19?_csrf_token=348752c9889bf273010d694694059fece3649eae
I need bugfix of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955257
In stable source FC19 with small patch I have same problem.
Karma: 2
Stable karma: 2
But
Pushed: False
O
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> I use mock to local build packages.
> I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
> How I fix it ?
> GEN gnome-control-center.1
> I/O error : Attempt to load network entity
> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/curre
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
08.05.2013 18:35 пользователь "Jerry James" написал:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko
> wrote:
> > I use mock to local build packages.
> > I was build control-center in mock. But always error...
>
On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
packages be buildable without internet access? I just had a quick search
on obvious terms through
https://fedoraproject.org/wik
Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 10:02 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
>
> Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
> packages be buildable without internet access? I just h
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 19:25 +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 mai 2013 à 10:02 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit :
> > On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
> >
> > Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guideline
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>
>> Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
>
>
> Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
> packages be buildable without internet access? I just had a qu
On 5/8/2013 10:59 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>>
>>> Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
>>
>>
>> Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guidelines require
>> packag
On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:59 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On 08/05/13 08:13 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >>
> >> Thx. But why in oficially packages doesn't fixed?
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know if it's actually the case that the guideline
Hi
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
> was actually written down in the guidelines somewhere.
>
It is not written down as policy and since the tools themselves enforce
this, I don't think it has b
Huh! Today this problem not present..
--
Best Regards,
Igor Gnatenko
09.05.2013 8:12 пользователь "Rahul Sundaram" написал:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
>> was actually written
On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 08:43:11AM +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/control-center-3.8.1.5-1.fc19?_csrf_token=348752c9889bf273010d694694059fece3649eae
> I need bugfix of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=955257
> In stable source FC19 with small patch
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
>> was actually written down in the guidelines somewhere.
>
>
> It is not written down as pol
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 22:48 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes, I know that, thanks. I didn't ask for a lecture, but whether this
> >> was actual
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 22:48 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Yes, I know that,
On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 11:15 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
[The build hosts do not have outside network access]
> That's very specific to the Fedora build environment. Difficult to
> replicate in the field without a huge local build structure!
If you do it using firewalls, yes, quite annoying.
On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:15:22 -0400
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> [ Sorry for the late reply, I've been at a family funeral this week. ]
:(
> That's very specific to the Fedora build environment. Difficult to
> replicate in the field without a huge local build structure! And
> enforced by a specif
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 25 May 2013 11:15:22 -0400
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> [ Sorry for the late reply, I've been at a family funeral this week. ]
>
> :(
>
>> That's very specific to the Fedora build environment. Difficult to
>> replicate in the field
Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'm sure we could ask the FPC to add this to guidelines.
> > I've filed such a ticket, please feel free to add comments:
> >
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/295
>
> It's reasonable, but is missing an import
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Björn Persson
wrote:
> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > I'm sure we could ask the FPC to add this to guidelines.
>> > I've filed such a ticket, please feel free to add comments:
>> >
>> > https://fedorahosted.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
