Re: Building dnf5 with sdbus-cpp 2.x in a side tag

2025-04-10 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 2:34 PM Marek Blaha wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 1:23 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > > It looks you are rebasing sdbus-cpp. > > > > Then either bundle the old library into the rebased package at build time. > > I.e. in sdbus-cpp.spec do: > > > > BuildRequires: sdbus-cpp

Re: Building dnf5 with sdbus-cpp 2.x in a side tag

2025-04-10 Thread Marek Blaha
On Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 1:23 PM Petr Pisar wrote: > It looks you are rebasing sdbus-cpp. > > Then either bundle the old library into the rebased package at build time. > I.e. in sdbus-cpp.spec do: > > BuildRequires: sdbus-cpp > install %{_libdir}/libsdbus-c++.so.1.so %{buildroot}%{_libdir}

Re: Building dnf5 with sdbus-cpp 2.x in a side tag

2025-04-10 Thread Petr Pisar
V Thu, Apr 10, 2025 at 12:30:48PM +0200, Marek Blaha napsal(a): > Hi, > > I'm working with Jonathan on releasing version 2 of the sdbus-cpp > library to Fedora. To do this properly, I planned to create a side > tag, build the updated library and dependent packages which I maintain > there, then no

Building dnf5 with sdbus-cpp 2.x in a side tag

2025-04-10 Thread Marek Blaha
Hi, I'm working with Jonathan on releasing version 2 of the sdbus-cpp library to Fedora. To do this properly, I planned to create a side tag, build the updated library and dependent packages which I maintain there, then notify fedora-devel about the SONAME bump and ask maintainers of dependent pac