On 26/11/10 23:47, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I recently rebuilt a failing mail server (sendmail and cyrus-imapd),
replacing the hardware and building the replacement machine offline (leaving
the current server in place while I did so).
This would seem normal enough to do, but had some
Hi.
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:15:47 +0100, nodata wrote
I don't agree. If you are replacing a production machine, you take
the keys from the old machine and use them. If you don't want to do
that, you buy new, probably stronger, certificates that are also
valid. I think your case only covers
On 27/11/10 16:44, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:15:47 +0100, nodata wrote
I don't agree. If you are replacing a production machine, you take
the keys from the old machine and use them. If you don't want to do
that, you buy new, probably stronger, certificates that are
On 11/27/10 8:15 AM, nodata wrote:
On 26/11/10 23:47, Philip Prindeville wrote:
I recently rebuilt a failing mail server (sendmail and cyrus-imapd),
replacing the hardware and building the replacement machine offline (leaving
the current server in place while I did so).
This would seem
On 11/27/10 1:09 PM, nodata wrote:
On 27/11/10 16:44, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:15:47 +0100, nodata wrote
I don't agree. If you are replacing a production machine, you take
the keys from the old machine and use them. If you don't want to do
that, you buy new,
I recently rebuilt a failing mail server (sendmail and cyrus-imapd), replacing
the hardware and building the replacement machine offline (leaving the current
server in place while I did so).
This would seem normal enough to do, but had some unintended pitfalls that
really should be more