Re: Can we do away with release and changelog bumping? (was: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal)

2020-07-06 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le dimanche 05 juillet 2020 à 23:36 +0200, Dan Čermák a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot via devel writes: > > > Le dimanche 05 juillet 2020 à 17:46 +0200, Björn Persson a écrit : > > > Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > > > So if you want to push Fedora release logic to its ultimate > > > >

Re: Can we do away with release and changelog bumping? (was: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal)

2020-07-05 Thread Dan Čermák
Nicolas Mailhot via devel writes: > Le dimanche 05 juillet 2020 à 17:46 +0200, Björn Persson a écrit : >> Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: >> > So if you want to push Fedora release logic to its ultimate >> > conclusion, >> > the thing that should be in charge of committing the new >> >

Re: Can we do away with release and changelog bumping? (was: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal)

2020-07-05 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le dimanche 05 juillet 2020 à 18:41 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > > While timestamping would remove the need to pass the last build info > to the next one it would also break all the workflows where several > rebuilds are done in parallel for separate needs, and the latest > rebuild is not

Re: Can we do away with release and changelog bumping? (was: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal)

2020-07-05 Thread Nicolas Mailhot via devel
Le dimanche 05 juillet 2020 à 17:46 +0200, Björn Persson a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > > So if you want to push Fedora release logic to its ultimate > > conclusion, > > the thing that should be in charge of committing the new > > release/changelog build state to package history in

Can we do away with release and changelog bumping? (was: RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal)

2020-07-05 Thread Björn Persson
Nicolas Mailhot via devel wrote: > So if you want to push Fedora release logic to its ultimate conclusion, > the thing that should be in charge of committing the new > release/changelog build state to package history in git is bodhi, not > koji. Why do build events need to be recorded in the Git