On Wed, 2017-11-15 at 00:47 +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > > I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
> > > last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
> > > The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will a
I dont want to reduce the time between branching and bodhi enablement. The gap
is for any short comings from branching, but if you guys think it is absolutely
necessary then I am okay with reducing it to a week.
Also, I want to point out that traditionally Alpha freeze and Bodhi enablement
will
Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> In MediaWiki, revisions compared in a diff do not need to
> belong to the same article. So for example, to compare the
> current revision of...(488139) to the current revision of
> ...(505754), you can use the URL
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?diff=505754&ol
On 11/14/2017 07:47 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
In MediaWiki, revisions compared in a diff do not need to
belong to the same article. So for example, to compare the
current revision of...(488139) to the current revision of
...(505754), you can use the URL
https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?dif
Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
>> last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
>> The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will ask FESCo for a
>> review, I would like to ask anyone who is interested
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 17:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
> last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
> The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will ask FESCo for a
> review, I w
On Tue, 2017-11-14 at 10:41 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 17:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
> > last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
> > The outcome is
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 17:27 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
> last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
> The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will ask FESCo for a
> review, I w
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 6:18 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:27:25PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jkurik/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle
>
> This looks generally good to me. The one change I would make is to
> add to "Tue: Primary date from wh
Dne 10.11.2017 v 18:18 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:27:25PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jkurik/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle
> Do we really want to have a window after branch where
> Bodhi isn't active?
Bit of OT, but I'd appreciate if
On 11/10/2017 09:18 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
...snip...
>
> On a bigger note: Do we really want to have a window after branch where
> Bodhi isn't active? Might it be better to put that as part of the
> Branch step? I don't think we want a longer freeze period (especially
> during beta) but we
Y
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
And, on a even bigger note, the F27 July-to-October experiment worked
reasonably well (with the large remainer of the still-outstanding
Modular Server) but I don't think we want to do that again. I'd like
to suggest that if the April/May
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:27:25PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jkurik/Fedora_Release_Life_Cycle
This looks generally good to me. The one change I would make is to
add to "Tue: Primary date from which rest of schedule derives". Make
that:
Tue: Primary date
Hi everybody,
I tried to merge together all the changes we were facing during the
last time with regards to Changes Policy & Fedora Release Life Cycle.
The outcome is available in [1] and [2]. Before I will ask FESCo for a
review, I would like to ask anyone who is interested for a review and
comme
14 matches
Mail list logo
